Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!





Recent Entries
Monday Morning Link Dump | Main | Why does anyone need a high-capacity magazine for their pistol? Why does anybody need an AR-15? [Steven Den Beste]
March 04, 2013

Yes, You Can Be Pro-Defense And Pro-Sequestration

The sequestration cuts were supposed to be so bad that no one would want to see it happen. The pressure point on conservatives and Republicans was supposed to be defense cuts. A funny thing happened though...plenty of conservatives looked at the cuts, shrugged their shoulders and said, it has to be done.

This has lead writers like William Kristol and David Frum to call out conservatives for letting the sequester happen.

Navy veteran and defense analysis Bryan McGrath (a good Twitter follow, despite his anti-hockey prejudice) explains why and how good pro-defense conservatives accept the sequester. In short: Priorities.

"The present state of our economy and the trajectory we are on with respect to government spending but especially entitlement spending, represents the most important threat to our long-term national security. We understand the requirements of citizenship and that taxes are the price we pay for a civil society, but we are increasingly uncomfortable with the growth of what government does and provides with the money we give it. We are the Party of a strong and rational national defense, and to that end, we have prioritized the threat. The threat is fiscal insolvency, and it must be addressed. We must retain a strong military, but not at the cost of a weakened country."

McGrath's piece is worth reading in full as he outlines the deterioration of the traditional national security coalition.

Just to be clear, there are real world choice involved in supporting sequestration. The most high profile to date is the cancellation of the deployment of a second aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf. Some will say it's pure politics but the DoD maintains it's simply good management to ensure we can have at least one carrier there at all times.

Personally, I don't care either way for two reasons.

First, the purpose of two carriers is to serve as a deterrence to Iran. Newsflash: we're not attacking Iran. The reelection of Barack Obama and the appointment of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense are far more clear signs of this than removing a carrier from the area is.

Second, too often people want to cut budgets but not missions. Well, that's how you break a force. If we don't have the money (and we don't) then we shouldn't take on the missions.

Yes, strategy should drive budgets and not the other way around but the reality is in a world of limited resources (aka, the real world) budget always drives strategy. You can always find bigger and better strategies that would consume 100% of GDP but the fact is, no one is allocating that money to defense so you begin with limited resources and go from there.

Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Admiral Mike Mullen (USN, Ret) called our debt, "the most significant threat to our national security" because of how it will impact military budgets. We're simply acting as if we believe him.


digg this
posted by DrewM. at 10:04 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
J.J. Sefton: " Great - The Marxist goons will be at Union Squar ..."

Al Sharpton: "[i]270 Forgot the Heinlein sock. Posted by: Co ..."

eleven: "[I]This is known as "bad luck".[/I] Is that a ..."

Costanza Defense: "Forgot the Heinlein sock. ..."

Washington Post Fact Checkers: "The Post has fact checked the Muppets. They are n ..."

The COS: "204 I could make that skit funny. I'd have Big Moo ..."

BackwardsBoy, Curmudgeon Extraordinaire [/i][/s][/b][/u]: "I remember where I was when the Zimmerman verdict ..."

toby928(C): "[I]whoa, see the update for a truly hacktastic "fa ..."

Nevergiveup: "Drudge says it's 5:30. No particular Time Zone. P ..."

Hurricane LaFawnduh: "Can you imagine the conversation? Aide: "This i ..."

Al Sharpton: "THESE PRETZELS ARE MAKING ME THIRSTY. Posted by: ..."

ace: "whoa, see the update for a truly hacktastic "fact ..."

Recent Entries
Search


MuNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat
Archives
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64