« Roberts the Coward | Main | Feds Cancel Oregon Town's Fireworks Display, Fearing It Will "Disrupt" Nearby Seabirds;
Also Seek Injunction Against Thor For Lightning Storms, Thunder »
July 03, 2012

Allen West: Romney Needs To Get Better Counsel From His Advisers; ObamaTax Is a Tax

At Politico:

“It’s a tax,” the Florida Republican told Greta Van Susteren of Fox News. “I think that the governor probably needs to look at who he has within his circle of advisers, and probably get … them to provide the right type of counsel and advice.”

This was precipitated by Romney adviser Eric Fernstrohm agreeing that ObamaTax was not a tax -- his argument is that it's not a tax, it's a penalty, ergo it's unconstitutional.

Now, this argument has appeal to Romney because he also imposed a mandate, and doesn't want the "tax-hiker!" charge leveled at himself.

But here's the thing: If ObamaTax is in fact a tax, then doesn't that mean... Justice Roberts got it right?

There's a lot of games-playing going on with politics, obviously. We're in campaign season, after all. The candidates do it, we do it.

I think a little too much is being pushed on to this point. On one hand, we're trying to recover some win from Roberts' disastrous decision by saying, "Well, at least he said it was a tax; that's politically useful."

On the other hand, we're insisting he got it wrong.

Well, if it got it wrong, it's not a tax. (Or I suppose there is a way to thread this needle: It's a tax, but an illegal tax, because it is not imposed for purposes of general revenues, but to force people into compliance with a federal law in an area the federal government has no authority... which actually winds up being a penalty, not a tax, so I guess that doesn't work.)

There's a lot of having-it-both-ways going on from all corners. Including from activists and pundits. I'm not sure how you can, in a single breath, declare Roberts' opinion in great error, and then castigate Romney for not embracing the erroneous opinion.

I Also Don't Get... Why this is supposedly a politically effective characterization.

People already didn't like the mandate. They didn't like it for a variety of reasons. One of those reasons is that they didn't like ObamaTax's takeover of health care, and the mandate was the most vulnerable avenue for undoing it.

People know what the mandate is. I think. Okay, I agree, some nitwits still don't know what it is, but whether they'll ever understand is anyone's guess.

But my point is people already have opinions on the mandate. Mostly, anyway. Does their opinion change if it's retroactively declared a "tax"? We can call things whatever we like, I guess; does that change the nature of what they are?

The people who didn't like the mandate -- more than a majority -- will, presumably, continue not liking it, knowing it's been declared a tax. No change there.

The people who like the mandate -- well, few actually like the mandate; but people who like Obama, and want him to get his Big Win -- like taxes so they don't really care all that much.

I guess we're down to those very, very low-information voters who might still have no opinion. But will their opinions be changed by the odd fact pattern that something that was claimed not to be a tax, and which looks like a penalty for noncompliance, is retroactively deemed a tax by the Supreme Court, in an opinion that neither the left nor the right embraces as sound in its reasoning?

This doesn't mean we shouldn't call ObamaTax a tax. Obviously, I'm doing it like crazy (and in fact I was, as far as I know, the first to call it ObamaTax).

But there's this attempt to claim that this is the point that swings the election, and we must all be on the same page about this, and then... I don't know. I find this habit annoying, the We Must All Agree To Agree thing.

So, call it a tax. I will. But how much does this actually matter? Even if we were all on the same page -- and Romney declared, "Yes, I raised taxes on Massachusetts taxpayers, just as Obama did on American ones" -- how much of an impact would our Unified Front actually have?


digg this
posted by Ace at 02:10 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
[/b][/i][/s]Muldoon: "The Granite Museum may actually be a good bargain ..."

Vic We Have No Party: "192 CBD is probably just now realizing, mid-crost ..."

no good deed: "Aw, Fen, I'm so sorry to hear that. Praying for th ..."

Colin: " He leaves a wife and 17 year and 20 year old daug ..."

Bitter Clinger and All That (Back from the Dead): "Posted by: NALNAMSAM at October 22, 2017 06:47 AM ..."

no good deed: "I am digging the weather we are having right now. ..."

freaked: "For those so inclinned the Weinman Mineral Museum ..."

All Hail Eris, She-Wolf of the 'Ettes 'Ettes: "Such sad news, Fen! Of course. ..."

FenelonSpoke: "For those that were on the gun thread last night I ..."

All Hail Eris, She-Wolf of the 'Ettes 'Ettes: "CBD is probably just now realizing, mid-crostini a ..."

Bitter Clinger and All That (Back from the Dead): "Posted by: 9 Dead guys that went looking for him a ..."

Mike Hammer, etc., etc.: " Well, that's good. Because you should never just ..."

Recent Entries
Search


MuNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat
Archives
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64