Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups


NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Registration Is Open!


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« The Daily DOOM | Main | "You Were Thinking Aboot Sausage" »
February 09, 2012

Santorum Is A Conservative By Reputation, But Not By Deed

“Ladies and gentlemen, I don't stand here to claim to be the conservative alternative to Mitt Romney. I stand here to be the conservative alternative to Barack Obama.”

That's what Rick Santorum said after Republican voters in Missouri, Minnesota, and Colorado gave him impressive victories this week over his Republican competitors. It is an awful, almost idiotic statement. Both for what it concedes and for what it claims. As to the latter, I have a house plant that's a conservative alternative to Barack Obama. No more need be said on that point.

As to the former, Santorum concedes that he's not a conservative alternative to Mitt Romney. How could he? Santorum was a pro-union congressman-turned-senator for 16 years, with notable votes against the National Right to Work Act and for the Davis-Bacon prevailing (read: union) wage law. He voted to increase the minimum wage six times and tried to put a union representative on an IRS oversight board. He also voted to exempt IRS union representatives from criminal ethics laws.

For a country finally coming to grips with the public policy problems with unions---particularly government employee unions---Santorum would make an awful national leader. Don't get me wrong, he's saying the right words now, but back when he was in Congress he wasn't exactly on our side. He excuses himself, of course:

"And you need to remember, I was from the state of Pennsylvania. State of Pennsylvania does not have a right to work law. The state legislature and our governor for a long time had rules in place that were inconsistent with right to work.

"And I wasn't, as United States senator, representing the states of Pennsylvania going to go down and by federal vote change the law on the state. I believe the state has the right. If they want a union dues requirement, that the state should be able to do that."

So he stood for state's rights on the union issue. Conservatives may find something admirable in that, I suppose. At least we know he's familiar with the Tenth Amendment, unlike Obama and the Democrats. Oh, wait:

"As a president, I have a very different point of view. I have already signed a letter and sent it to the national right to work that I would sign a national right to work bill because now, I'm no longer representing that state."

Well, nevermind. I guess union rights aren't a state right after all. Or maybe state's rights don't matter because now he's no longer representing a state? Oy.

Santorum makes a similar claim about his former support for Davis-Bacon prevailing wages, noting that he worked for a state that had a "large percentage" of state contractors working under state prevailing wage laws. Is it possible that Santorum is unaware that as president he would be working for a country that has a "large percentage" (aka 99%) of federal contractors working under the Davis-Bacon prevailing wage law?

Santorum had a fairly long career inside the Beltway and he's from a blue industrial state, so some poorly-explained flip-flops like these are bound to crop up. But Santorum's lack of conservative bonafides is worse than just some flip-flops. He is remarkably not adopting a "very different point of view" on issues that were central to the Republican and Tea Party resurgence in 2010.

His paean to earmarks and ridicule of earmark opponents should be enough to disqualify him. The $100 million dollars he secured for a clean-energy facility in Pennsylvania should be raising eyebrows, not to mention his go-along-to-get-along vote for the Bridge to Nowhere. The total cost of Santorum's earmarks tops $1 billion. He went so far as to sue Donald Rumsfeld to prevent base closures in Pennsylvania. And he joined Democrats to prevent Republicans from cutting and reforming food stamps. These weren't isolated or unusual votes for Santorum and he continues to believe that they were the right thing to do. As a result of votes like these, Santorum has a lower ACU rating than, for example, Newt Gingrich.

So, please, don't pretend to me that Santorum is an outstanding conservative. He's a presidential candidate with a recent, suspicious, and only partial commitment to mouthing conservative beliefs. A man once wisely said, "A track record is a pretty good indication of what you’re going to do in the future." It was Rick Santorum.


digg this
posted by Gabriel Malor at 09:29 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Butch Dykes: "278 DEI and a gym would seem to be a perfect match ..."

Smell the Glove: "Somewhat on topic, but Doomcock yesterday had a go ..."

wth: "Planet Witness ...... Planet Witless ..."

Axeman: "Unless GW retcons the Sisters into having guys it ..."

Blanco: "People shouldn't boycott Planet Fitness. But ag ..."

A dude in MI: "9 year old hitmen coming soon ..."

Wally: "DEI and a gym would seem to be a perfect match, be ..."

wth: "The Pentagon admitted they cannot account for tril ..."

18-1: "[i]Why are we paying taxes? The country operates i ..."

Texas: "Kids murder free! ..."

Moron Analyst: "Unless GW retcons the Sisters into having guys it ..."

Axeman: "And of course no one is bitching about the lack of ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64