Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
Video below of Alito asking, basically, do you think any citizen who had not been yet subject to the EPA's hearing free, evidence free, appeal free imposition of penalties would think that this could possibly happen in America?
Which seems to be the main point. There used to be a doctrine, since abandoned as too loosey-goosey and subjective, that if a process "shocked the conscience" it was was unconstitutional.
I'm not calling for a return to that rudderless standard. I'm just saying, when a "legal" process is so one-sided and renders the victim powerless to even challenge it in court, most people would say, "Sure, happens all the time in Russia."
They would not imagine this was Standard Operating Procedure in the United States' EPA.