« Drummers At Zucotti Park: Let's Face Facts, This Movement Is All About The Drumming |
Main
|
BREAKING: OWS CLOSE TO HISTORIC ACCORD ON DRUMMING
UPDATE: ACCORD THREATENED BY DEMAND FOR EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLARS »
October 21, 2011
Miami Herald's Blog: Rubio Didn't Embellish His Life Story -- The Washington Post Did
Did Rubio mislead people into believing, as the Washington Post insists he had, that his family had fled Cuba after Castro came to power?
No.
T Rubio's parents came to the US before then, in 1956. They remained in the US after Castro took over in 1959. They returned to Cuba for brief stints early on, before the country devolved into Soviet-style totalitarianism.
But the top of the story suggests Rubio himself has given this "dramatic account:" that "he was the son of exiles, he told audiences, Cuban Americans forced off their beloved island after 'a thug,' Fidel Castro, took power." (Update note: The story struck the word "dramatic").
However, the story doesn't cite one speech where Rubio actually said that.
To back up the lead, the Washington Post excerpts from a 2006 address in the Florida House where Rubio said “in January of 1959 a thug named Fidel Castro took power in Cuba and countless Cubans were forced to flee... Today your children and grandchildren are the secretary of commerce of the United States and multiple members of Congress...and soon, even speaker of the Florida House.”
The catch: If you listen to the speech, Rubio isn't just talking about those who specifically fled Cuba after Castro took power. He doesn't say that his parents fled Cuba. Instead, he was talking about "a community of exiles." That is: He was talking about all the Cubans who live in Miami.
...
Rubio's office has told both the Washinton Post, the St. Petersburg Times and The Miami Herald that his parents came to the United States prior to Castro taking power. And he has said it more than once. In the article we wrote last month about his pending autobiography, Rubio clearly told us his parents came here before Castro took power. He struggled to recall the year (this isn't in the story, it's in my notes) and said it was in "57 or 58 or 59."
When asked pointedly: Was it before the revolution? Rubio said it was before the revolution.
Rubio defends himself from this weaksauce here.
Video of him defending himself from this silly crap at The Right Scoop.
The guy who wrote this piece turns out to be an apologist to Castro who just happens to be writing a book on Rubio. Coming to a remainder bin near you.
In related non-news, the Washington Post never asked how the "Religion: Muslim" entry on Obama's Indonesian school application came about.