Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« Overnight Open Thread - From the Manpower Revolution to the Activation Paradigm: Explaining Institutional Continuity and Change in an Integrating Europe Edition [Rajiv Vindaloo] | Main | Saturday Morning Open Thread »
May 14, 2011

Indiana Supremes: All Your Home Are Belong To Us

This week the Indiana Supreme Court held in a 3-2 decision that there is no right to resist an unlawful police entry into the home. A principle enshrined in the common law and previously well-founded in the Fourth Amendment -- that "the physical entry of the home is the chief evil against which the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed" -- was decided by the three member majority to be "superseded" by modern jurisprudence.

The three-member majority explains why it is ignoring the longstanding (and current) precedent under the U.S. Constitution:

We believe however that a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. Nowadays, an aggrieved arrestee has means unavailable at common law for redress against unlawful police action. E.g . . . the following modern developments: (1) bail, (2) prompt arraignment and determination of probable cause, (3) the exclusionary rule, (4) police department internal review and disciplinary procedure, and (5) civil remedies. We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest.

The dissenting judges noted that the majority was abandoning both a bedrock principle of the Fourth Amendment and that there was no need to depart so drastically even if they were hell-bent on ruling against this particular defendant (who seems pretty darn unsympathetic). The more obvious rule would be that which the U.S. Supreme Court and other states have applied: there is a right to resist unlawful police entry so long as the force used is reasonable.

Such a "reasonable man" rule is employed in many parts of the law and is frequently put to juries to decide. Something tells me these jurists wanted to take that determination entirely out of the hands of simple jurors...

Lawgeeks will want to take a look at both dissents here (PDF).


digg this
posted by Gabriel Malor at 01:06 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
JackStraw: "If Trump was a real president he would volunteer H ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _ : " 513 And why do I have to listen to Metallica on M ..."

Cheri: "581 - just his part. The rest had to be better. ..."

Miklos McMiklos, of the Auld and Ancient Clan McMiklos: "Raising a glass to morons present and departed, pl ..."

Jane D'oh: "Come on, Trump. An eager nation waits to see what ..."

nurse ratched, garbage: "Didn't one of MLK's daughters endorse Trump? ..."

Martini Farmer: "The majority of federal employees spend their time ..."

Diogenes: "Damn...was it that bad? Posted by: eleven at Janu ..."

Pug Mahon, Day 7 of Funemployment: "I pretty much stopped watching the inaugural stuff ..."

bluebell: "Sheesh. More blathering. ..."

Alberta Oil Peon: "I haven't been there, but there is a place in Flat ..."

Axeman: "Liberty Ball is best. Posted by: Boss Moss at Jan ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64