Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Average Total Yearly Compensation For Milwaukee Teachers: $101,000 | Main | Minor League Hockey Team Stages Charlie Sheen Night Promotion
March 04, 2011

Jay Cost: 8% Unemployment in 2012 Means Likely Defeat For Barack Hussein Obama

8% seems doable (at least to Obama's optimists), so that is being predicted to be the win/lose threshold.

I think there's some liberal narrative mischief in this idea. Cost says that the idea that 8% is the threshold is popping up all over the media. This may be battlefield preparation, by establishing it in the public's mind that if the unemployment rate drops to the still-hideously-high level of 8%, Obama's done his job, and deserves reelection.

They've done this before with Obama, again and again, lowering the threshold for what in the public's mind should be considered "success." Obama is the first president in history to benefit from the lax, vague, impossible to define standard of jobs lost versus jobs saved or created; every other president was judged on jobs lost versus jobs created, no "saved" category. (And even that lax standard proved too tough for Obama to succeed by: later spin had it that his job "creation" figures should be based on just on jobs created, nor jobs created or saved, but ultimately jobs funded or saved or created.)

Is this then an attempt to spin a vicious, soul-crushing unemployment rate of 8% as some kind of success for a president so if Obama reaches this relatively doable level (or anywhere near it -- I have a feeling that 8.7% will do in a pinch) he should be congratulated?

It's either that or wishful thinking on the part of his stalwarts. Or a mixture of both.

Cost plots the data and determines that in five elections where the unemployment rate was above 7% (not 8%), the incumbent party lost four out of five times. The sole winner in this group of over-7%-unemployment was Reagan in 1984, and Regan benefited from the fact that the unemployment rate was just above 7% and, critically, that the economy grew at a very-high rate of 7.2% that year -- so while the public could still feel the pain of unemployment, they were also aware that there had just been a sizable burst of GDP growth which would translate into falling unemployment shortly. (Which it did.)

If Obama's at over 8%, unless there is some Reagan-like burst of growth this year, the data suggest he's in trouble.

On the other hand, I think that the Democratic Party now consists largely of people nearly immune to economic factors -- students who get their money from their parents, the dependent poor that gets their money from government, a dependent middle-class of unionists who depend on the government to side with them in disputes with management and thus are indirectly dependent on the government for wages, and a goverment worker class, which, is a dependent middle class that is strictly dependent on the government for its wages.

The benefit of being the Party of Government is that the Party of Government can immunize its ever-growing number of dependents against the baleful effects of a recession (or depression). The Party of Government voters never face layoffs and cutbacks; only the voters of the Party of Wealth Creation are vulnerable to such cycles. And the Party of Government can always tax the Party of Wealth Creators even more heavily if it gets into a pinch.

The Party of Wealth Creators doesn't have the power to tax the party of government.

So, I don't know. Cost's analysis is interesting but I wonder if the rules haven't changed enough that a high-unemployment president can get re-elected simply because he has so many voters functioning in a parallel government-economy unaffected by changes in the real economy.

digg this
posted by Ace at 03:40 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
rhennigantx: "Its Hump Day ..."

rhennigantx: "Researchers provide novel insights into female psy ..."

Warai-otoko : "Maybe, but it contributes to isolating Israel on t ..."

JM in Ill -- Behold the Manchurian Candidate: "Ah. Yes, General Napier knew how to deal with a ba ..."

Warai-otoko : "Some worry that big brother can see into your bank ..."

Nevergiveup: "A biden Blood Libel Posted by: Nevergiveup at Feb ..."

OrangeEnt: "The SS national hotline doesn't open until 8 am, s ..."

Village Idiot's Apprentice: "I thought I had herd that part of the Gaza Cease-F ..."

pawn: "Also clear your browser cache. ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] : "[i]Trying to decipher my homeowners insurance poli ..."

OrangeEnt: "200 Mb of free memory is way low. See if you ca ..."

Greta The Great: "Well, this sound bad: @Breaking911 4m BREAKING ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64