« Reporters, Prompted By Rightwing Blogs, Ask Russ Carnahan If His Own Staffer Was Arrested (and Released) In Connection With Firebombing |
Main
|
Pre-ONT question of the day »
August 25, 2010
Exclusive: Half-Baked Libertarian Candidate Writes Confusingly About Murky's Possible Candidacy In His Place
Drew wrote the Libertarian Party candidate, this guy, asking for comment/confirmation, etc.
This is what he got back. Put aside the 2nd-grade-level grammatical errors ("would of") and, in between splitting atoms, he's saying that the door is open to her, if only she'll walk through.
He says, he actually says, the Message (the Libertarian party's message) is more important than the Messenger (himself).
Drew's question:
Good afternoon,
I'm a blogger with the site Ace of Spades HQ (ace.mu.nu) and we've been
covering the Republican Senate Primary. As I'm sure you're well aware, there's speculation Senator Murkowski may try to run on your party's line
should she lose the GOP primary.
Do you have any statement on that speculation and your intentions for your
campaign?
Thank you very much for your time,
DrewM.
Ace of Spades HQ
Less than three bong-hits later:
Hi Drew
The Message is more important than messenger.
If Lisa would of supported "The Peoples Bail Out" she would of over
whelmed Joe Miller so I doubt she would do it now, some people just do
not get it, but it is never to late to see the truth and Lisa is a
smart lady; I voted for her.
David
And he voted for her, too? He voted in the Republican Primary instead of his own, for himself?
The hell kind of stoners' gangbang do they have going on up there?
So all Murkowski has to do, if I'm reading this right, is support a platform he calls "The People's Bailout" (or, as he terms it in his email, "The Peoples Bail Out,"or in the paper itself, "The Peoples Bailout") and she can have his slot?
(Drew emailed me this document but it's too large to upload to the site.)
Well, I think he's talking about the wrong person, then. Because the Lisa Murkowski I know is not at all the sort to suddenly embrace a political position she disagrees with just to further her own personal pecuniary interests. No sir, no thank you, sir!