Don't Ask, Don't Leak: WikiLeaks Traitor Openly-Gay Activist Upset Over Treatment of Gays In the Military
American Media Blacking Out That Fact Utterly From Coverage

The argument made by the military is that open homosexuality is bad for morale and discipline.

Pfc. Bradley Manning is doing his all to prove that.

I am less outraged by the gay angle here than the media suppression angle: I didn't know this. Did you know this? I never heard a word of this.

That's what you call an embargo, my friends. If it doesn't advance The Narrative, it never really happened.

"The revelations of Manning’s openly pro-homosexual conduct suggest that a more liberal Department of Defense policy, in deference to the wishes of the Commander-in-Chief, had already been in effect and has now backfired in a big way. The result could be not only the loss of the lives of U.S. soldiers, as a result of the enemy understanding U.S. intelligence sources and methods, but damaged relations with Afghanistan and Pakistan and a possible U.S. military defeat in the region as a whole." - Accuracy in Media

...

According to one story appearing in Britain's The Telegraph, Manning, who served as a US Army intelligence analyst, became depressed after a break-up with his homosexual campanion. He also wrote: "Bradley Manning is not a piece of equipment," and quoted a joke about "military intelligence" being an oxymoron.

Manning, who is openly homosexual, began his gloomy postings on January 12, saying: "Bradley Manning didn't want this fight. Too much to lose, too fast."

...

Pentagon investigators plan to delve into Manning’s background to ascertain if they missed any warnings when he applied to join the US Army. According to The Telegraph, in May 2010, when he was serving at a US military base near Baghdad, he changed his status to: "Bradley Manning is now left with the sinking feeling that he doesn't have anything left."

Italics added. I don't mean to be glib but that is in fact a sign they missed something.

And so set loose the Taliban on the heroic peasants cooperating with our military.

After WikiLeaks published a trove of U.S. intelligence documents—some of which listed the names and villages of Afghans who had been secretly cooperating with the American military—it didn’t take long for the Taliban to react. A spokesman for the group quickly threatened to “punish” any Afghan listed as having “collaborated” with the U.S. and the Kabul authorities against the growing Taliban insurgency. In recent days, the Taliban has demonstrated how seriously those threats should be considered. Late last week, just four days after the documents were published, death threats began arriving at the homes of key tribal elders in southern Afghanistan. And over the weekend one tribal elder, Khalifa Abdullah, who the Taliban believed had been in close contact with the Americans, was taken from his home in Monar village, in Kandahar province’s embattled Arghandab district, and executed by insurgent gunmen.

The violence may just be beginning. According to Agha Lali, the deputy head of Kandahar’s provincial council, threatening letters have been delivered to 70 elders in Panjwaii district. While it is unknown whether any of the men were indeed named in the WikiLeaks documents, it’s clear the Taliban believes they have been cooperating with Western forces and the Afghan government. One short handwritten note, shown to NEWSWEEK, said: “We have made a decision for your death. You have five days to leave Afghan soil. If you don’t, you don’t have the right to complain.” The screed, written on the letterhead of Mullah Mohammed Omar’s defunct Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, bore the signature of Abdul Rauf Khadim, a senior Taliban official and former inmate at the American lockup in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, who had been released into—and subsequently escaped from—Kabul’s custody last year.

Into whose arms did this hystrionic little bitch fly? Into the Taliban's, of course. They treat openly-gay homosexuals nicely. (At least the ones branded as homosexual; they seem to have a lot of nuance in the definition 'round Taliban country.)

The Taliban, which did this to a woman who'd fled her family. Warning: Very Graphic Image Below the Fold.

Commenters said they wanted this guy hanged, and I dismissed that, saying "You know we don't do that anymore."

I have changed my mind. Yes, it's still true we don't do that anymore; but I now think it's important to set an example. He should be hanged. He set the Taliban wolves after good people, and he did it over... a break-up? Not feeling appreciated enough?

Kill him. Make it a cause celebre, and make him an example to the next leaker.

String him up and choke him until he is dead, dead, dead.

And this "man" too -- or at least put him in a hole.

The more people I kill, the more powerful I become!
It's like the most awesomest game of
World of Warcraft eveh!!!

Internet Disease is dangerous -- and sometimes there's only one cure.

Kill them.

American Media Blacking Out That Fact Utterly From Coverage&bodytext=The argument made by the military is that open homosexuality is bad for morale and discipline. Pfc. Bradley Manning is doing his all to prove that. I am less outraged by the gay angle here than the media suppression angle:...&topic=world_news"> posted by Ace at 02:49 PM

| Access Comments