Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Moron Meet-Ups
ColoradoMoMe 2020: 04/25/2020 Wheat Ridge CO: Postponed
Contact Westminsterdogshow for information.

NoVaMoMe 2020: Rescheduled for August 29, 5:00-10:00 pm, Fairfax, Virginia. Contact Bluebell & Weasel with questions.
« Planck Telescope's Six-Month Snapshot of Universe's "Oldest Light" | Main | Best Campaign Ad of 1985 Finally Surfaces in 2010 »
July 06, 2010

Suit Challenging Arizona Law's Constitutionality Will Soon Be Filed
BUMP: DOJ Just Filed

BUMP [Gabe]: FoxNews is reporting that the Department of Justice just filed. More info as I get it.

Here's a vague news slug. No more info than Ace had below.

Original Post:
"Later," the WSJ says, quoting anonymous administration officials, suggesting later today or tomorrow (or else why else re-break the news?).

The Obama administration has criticized the law and the Justice Department's challenge is expected to argue that it infringes on federal responsibilities for immigration, the officials said.

Federal responsibilities.

I need to hear from some lawyers on this, because I've been wondering. It is accepted constitutional law (whether you agree or not, it's accepted) that states cannot pass laws which conflict with federal law in areas of federal jurisdiction.

In this case, however, the Arizona law does not conflict with federal law; it in fact restates it. Deliberately, to be as constitutional as possible and to set up a good question:

Yes, a state law cannot conflict with a federal law in an area of federal jurisdiction, but can a state policy conflict with a federal policy if both state the same law?

In other words -- Arizona's law is the same as the feds'. The big difference is not in the law, but in the policy: the feds have a policy of non- or minimal enforcement; they are angry at Arizona not because Arizona has passed fresh law but because Arizona intends a different policy -- a policy of actual enforcement.

So yes, federal law trumps state law, but does mere federal policy trump state policy, especially when federal policy is in fact at odds with its own stated law?

Can the feds basically argue that it's their policy to ignore the law and then demand that Arizona be instructed by the Supreme Court to follow them in their policy of ignoring the law?

What About Discrimination? Good point from Ed Morrissey:

Furthermore, this is weak tea compared to the Obama administration’s rhetoric on the subject. They have spent the last three months declaring this unconstitutional on the basis of discrimination. If that were true, the government would have made that its primary argument. The fact that they’re going with pre-emption means that they’re conceding that the discrimination argument never held water — and that their accusations of bigotry against Arizonans were nothing more than demagoguery.

digg this
posted by Ace at 02:32 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Zod: ">>175 Mattis was supposed to exit us from A ..."

rhennigantx dont californicate my TEXAS: "Is this the son who hadn't seen his father since h ..."

Lizzy[/i]: ">>I know where you are coming from. But they have ..."

Huck Follywood, hunker in the bunker: "The question is not why President Trump was there ..."

runner: "obama picked "This Country Was Founded on Protest" ..."

Ian S.: "[I]It will make zero difference. It will run in a ..."

Moron Robbie - Reject the systemic racism of Affirmative Action : "If I'm following along correctly, we're now suppos ..."

Zod: ">>No handstand? No parakeet? Posted by: gram ..."

Tom Servo: ""President Lincoln has done very little towards ov ..."

BooBoo49: "I for one am very optimistic! These issues that ha ..."

rhennigantx dont californicate my TEXAS: "I give you a lot of credit for watching. I can not ..."

Susan D Harms: "Mattis was supposed to exit us from Afghanistan an ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64