Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Will Folks: "Let the Bidding Begin!" | Main | Top Headline Comments 5-26-10 »
May 26, 2010

Will Folks: I Am Aggressively Working To Gather All The Evidence That Really Should Be In My Possession Already

Sorry, I can't keep away. Doesn't this strike you as odd?

Folks said the proof exists in e-mails and texts between him and Haley that he and his attorneys are pulling together now. “Nikki says it’s categorically false. The problem with that is it’s categorically true,” Folks said in a phone interview Tuesday. “I have a stack of emails and phone records in my possession, right now, that prove, right now, the affair happened.

See that last sentence? I changed it. That's not what he said. That's what I would expect him to say. He has all the texts, right? And all the phone records. This is not a complicated procedure.

But here's the actual sentence he really did say:

"There will be a very aggressive effort mounted to obtain all of the data that will corroborate what I’ve said."

There will be (future tense; indicates intention, not existing fact) a very aggressive effort mounted ("effort" comes pre-packaged with the possibility of failure) to obtain (to-- future tense again; and obtain -- he doesn't have them now) all of the data (all of it? Wouldn't one untoward email be enough?) that will (future tense) corroborate what I've said.

See what I'm getting at? The way he's saying this, he's setting it up so it seems like there is a real chance of failure of proving this so if he fails, he can say, "Well, I tried, but I couldn't get the data together. But I'm telling the truth."

But I don't understand how someone who had any sort of relationship with someone would not have some incriminating records easily at hand. I mean -- can't you just dig up your old emails? Again -- one naughty one would suffice. One flirty one wouldn't prove an affair, but it would make the allegation more plausible.

Am I missing something? How is it so difficult for the very-capable, awesome Will Folks to get the sort of emails that he'd naturally have bunches of?

Why does he need a team to dig into his own awesome pipe-layin' past? Are there so many names in his little black book?

Why is this merely an "effort" and not an already-achieved fact? Why is he speaking of things that will happen, rather than those that already have?

It just seems that all of this has excuses for failure built into it.

Why the hell would he need excuses?

He's claiming this happened in 2005, not 1905. What the hell is with the archeological dig here?

Does he have the fucking emails as a previous statement said or is it that he "will" have them after an "aggressive effort" is made to collect "all of the data"?

This guy has said six things since I've heard of him, and five of them are either obvious lies or very suspicious, as they make no frickin' sense, but he's seriously asking people to trust him on that last one, the big one.

Which is pretty hard to believe, too.

The thing is, I kind of want to believe him. I have no big thing for Nikki Haley (just heard of her, really) and I'm cynical, so I tend to believe the worst, and further, psychologically, I feel less bad about being wrong when I suspect someone of something dirty than I do about being wrong when I defend them as innocent.

Know what I mean? If I said "Nikki Haley probably did this," and I was wrong, I'd feel bad about casting aspersions, but I wouldn't feel dumb and gullible.

But if I say "I don't believe this, she's innocent," and then she turns out guilty, I would feel dumb and gullible. Which is the worse thing for me. Feelin' stupid.

Psychologically, I have less at risk to just say, "Ah, she did it, come on. All rumors are true."

But... damnit, everything this guy says is either transparently false or suspiciously weird.

Right out of the box, he came at with me with some nonsense about revealing this in order to avoid "humiliation" to his honor and other twaddle; so his first introduction to me was a lie. "'Hello,' he lied," as the quote goes.

And then the strangeness just keeps on coming.

Uh-Oh... Here's some funny stuff that might have gotten lost at the end of the last post:Commenters have gone to Stage Three of a full internet craze -- Demotivator posters.

Demotivator: "Honor".

Slublog: Proof of Will Folks' DC Super-Playah Past.

Demotivator: "Principles."

From Empire of Jeff. This one playing on Folks' claim he had to reveal this to the press, but wanted to do so "respectfully" as concerns Nikki Haley. Demotivator: "Respectful Revelations."

(Don't send me these; it's too big a pain in the ass to upload and link them... just save them yourself to photobucket or flickr and post the url!)

digg this
posted by Ace at 03:31 AM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
The Button Down Mind: "Bob Newhart is, was, and forevermore shall be, the ..."

80's music fan: "Tell us you have never met a democrat without tell ..."

LinusVanPelt : "Joe Biden: Is it live or is it memorex?? ..."

BruceWayne: "I love ya kid. Things Joe has never said to Kamala ..."

TheJamesMadison, riding the anarchy train with John Landis: "454 Boy the "chaotic" "out of control" Democrat pa ..."

no one of any consequence: "Last time I checked, and it was about 40 years ago ..."

...: "Over under on when we see the first Che style Kama ..."

Minnfidel: "I love ya kid. Things Joe has never said to Kamala ..."

runner: "BREAKING 🚨 The Whitehouse Gets Caught Usin ..."

SMOD: "First Lady Paris-Bound for Olympics to Lead Americ ..."

Warai-otoko : "Endorse is one of those words that loses its meani ..."

...: "Boy the "chaotic" "out of control" Democrat party ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64