Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

New Orleans Local Anchor Decides That He, Too, Wants a Piece of That Oft-F'd Chicken | Main | Will Folks Is Really Creeping Me The F--- Out
Update: Misrepresented Emails In Domestic Violence Case
May 25, 2010

Heh: Slate Runs Experiment To Prove People Can Be Deceived By Falsified Pictures; Winds Up Proving Progressives Are Weak-Minded Dummies

As I was reading this, I was thinking, "Cool experiment! I want to post this, but it really doesn't seem political at all -- not really partisan, can't make a point out of it."

I decided, halfway through -- who cares? Readers like interesting stuff, partisan or not. If I thought it was cool, probably a lot of people would.

Turns out, yeah, there's a partisan dig here after all.

Slate's experiment concerned the way memory could be shaped and refashioned through the use of doctored, false photographs. They would (I'm simplifying) show subjects (over 5000) a series of pictures, four real and one fake, and ask if people remembered the event depicted in the fake one.

Depending on the picture, up to 40% said they remembered the false reality presented.

Okay? Interesting on its own, right? Well, here's the partisan part. To set this up: One fake photograph had Bush in a pick up with pitching great Roger Clemens during Hurricane Katrina, goofing off instead of working. (He didn't see Clemens, and left his ranch to monitor Katrina from the White House.) Another picture had Obama shaking Ahmadinejad's hand. (They never shook hands, and apparently never even got close enough to get in a photo together.)

Okay, take it away:

Ideology influenced recollections, but not consistently. Thirty-four percent of progressives who were shown the Bush-Clemens photo (212 out of 616) remembered that incident, while only 14 percent of conservatives who saw the same photo (7 out of 49) remembered it. We expected that discrepancy to be reversed among subjects who were shown the Obama handshake, but it wasn't. Progressives were slightly more likely than conservatives to remember that the handshake happened: 49 percent (305 out of 618) to 45 percent (30 out of 66).

Conservatives, basically, admitted they didn't remember the event in question more often, even when it cut against their party affiliation.

It should be noted, though, that as Slate leans pretty hard left, any conservatives reading the magazine are going to be self-selecting and probably pretty sharp; they are deliberately choosing to read, basically, enemy propaganda.

Plus, progressives are more trustful of a leftwing outlet like Slate. And conservatives reading it are fundamentally mistrustful -- it's likely they sort of smelled a rat. (And do note how very different those progressive and conservative samples are; in the several hundreds versus 60-70.)(

That said, look: I have a feeling there's another factor. "Progressives" and liberals find it hard to ever confess they don't know something; a lot of their politics is actually a defense mechanism for intellectual insecurity. (Vote our way, and that proves you're a smartie!)

The worst crime, to a liberal, is ignorance.

So I think they are especially prey to any trick like this that asks them whether they know something or are ignorant of it -- they're going to have a strong bias towards claiming they "know" stuff, even stuff that's not actually true at all.

Correction: I misread their claim about Bush and Clemens; I've rewritten to explain the falsity of the picture. I think.

One thing they do, wrongly I think for these purposes, is base a false picture on something that is fuzzily true in some broader sense. They note this issue themselves -- like the fact that Lieberman didn't vote Clinton guilty during impeachment (the false picture), but did make a big deal of scolding him.

The problem isn't that some of these pictures are kinda-sorta based on something genuine, but that some are truer to some extent than others. It's an impossible thing to quantify, of course. But it makes it hard to pull conclusions out of the experiment.

digg this
posted by Ace at 06:25 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
weft cut-loop[/i][/b] [/s]: "Of course, they substitute the word, yon, for four ..."

Mary Ann: "Fresh ginger is great stuff. [i]Posted by: RedM ..."

weft cut-loop[/i][/b] [/s]: "[i]Is 4 some kind of Japanese superstition? Poste ..."

[/i] [/s] [/u] [/b]An Observation sez China Joe not my president: " Fani was just checking to see if Nathan's Hot Do ..."

CharlieBrown'sDildo: " I have a thick cut pork porterhouse that I need t ..."

gourmand du jour: "That's OK, I had no plans to make my own sushi. La ..."

weft cut-loop[/i][/b] [/s]: "[i]I haven't tried sushi with the rice made in the ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "[i]I recently learned that fresh ginger is excelle ..."

Skip: "Thankfully my wife's hobby of making yogurt has en ..."

gourmand du jour: "I haven't tried sushi with the rice made in the co ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "[i]Pork Milanese with a tomato and arugula salad. ..."

screaming in digital: "Bacon deficient?! O_o Posted by: RedMindBlue ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64