Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« About Last Night.... | Main | Pretty Funny: Parody of "The Greatest Political Ad In History" »
May 19, 2010

Maybe the Democrats Aren't Doomed, Says Politico

Possibly they're right -- we did lose a big one last night.

(At least for now: Remember November.)

However, Politico is overlooking something. Yes, Murtha's district leans conservative -- but not Republican. Politico ticks off the poll numbers that demonstrate the district seems to have a conservative temper in making its case for Democratic resurgence, but elides an important fact:

After all, this is a heavily Democratic district that elected the same Democrat the last eighteen elections. Their registration edge is in double digits, so an eight-point loss for Republicans isn’t a bad showing.

Politico ignores this fact as contrary to the narrative and simply declares this to be some kind of Republican bastion that we lost when we should have won. No; it was a district we should have lost, in any other cycle, but had hope for in this one cycle -- and those hopes were dashed. Which isn't really surprising.

But more importantly, Murtha's district has leaned far more Murtha than for any party. Murtha Pork is the lifeblood of this economically depressed area; an awful lot of people rely, directly and indirectly, upon Murtha's -- or his proxy's -- ability to funnel millions of dollars from the rest of the country into this small slice of Pennsylvania.

If ideology were the determinant consideration here, the district should have fallen to the Republicans a while ago.

Furthermore, Critz ran as a conservative Republican, nearly, adopting the Tea Party's positions on the bailouts and health care and the social conservatives' position on abortion. This isn't really some kind of vindication for the Democratic Party generally, and certainly not for Obama's out-and-proud brand of liberalism.

One more thing: The media has been telling us that the mood in the country -- the strong disapproval of incumbent Democrats -- was anti-incumbent and not anti-Democratic at all. They've made this claim too many times to recount.

So, in Pennsylvania, a non-incumbent faced another non-incumbent and the non-incumbent won, as he had to.

Or, since Critz was, arguably, the proxy for the ultra-incumbent but quite dead Abscam Jack Murtha, then perhaps this is a signal that incumbents aren't necessarily in trouble. But only in places that rely heavily on federal spending.

Either way, the MFM could keep with their precious anti-incumbency storyline.

But now we're told this was actually a victory for the Democratic cause.

When Republicans are winning, it's only a victory for the forces of anti-incumbency, with no import as regards the nation's preferred ideology. But suddenly when the Democrats win one (and this was always a longshot for us) it's no longer a referendum on incumbency at all, but a referendum on the Democratic Party, and they won, so for the MFM it's Yayy, us!

All the evidence pointing to monster Republican House gains this fall—the Scott Brown upset win in Massachusetts, the scary polling numbers in once-safely Democratic districts, the ever-rising number of Democratic seats thought to be in jeopardy—was contradicted Tuesday.

In the only House race that really mattered to both parties—the special election to replace the late Democratic Rep. John Murtha in Pennsylvania’s 12th District—Republicans failed spectacularly, losing on a level playing field where, in this favorable environment, they should have run roughshod over the opposition.

Given the resources the GOP poured into the effort to capture the seat and the decisiveness of the defeat—as it turned out, it wasn’t really that close—the outcome casts serious doubt on the idea that the Democratic House majority is in jeopardy and offers comfort to a Democratic Party that is desperately in search of a glimmer of hope.

The district itself couldn’t have been more primed for a Republican victory. According to one recent poll, President Barack Obama’s approval rating in the 12th was a dismal 35 percent, compared to 55 percent who disapproved. His health care plan was equally unpopular—just 30 percent of those polled supported it, while 58 percent were in opposition.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was even more disliked in the blue-collar, western Pennsylvania-based seat: Just 23 percent viewed her favorably, compared to 63 percent who viewed her unfavorably.

Still, Democrat Mark Critz managed to pull off an eight-point victory, 53 percent to 45 percent, over Republican Tim Burns in a district that John McCain narrowly won in 2008—the only one in the nation that voted for John Kerry in 2004 and McCain four years later.

The race marked the third highly-contested, fair-fight special House election that the GOP has dropped in the last year.

The seat Murtha held for 36 years is precisely the sort of Rust Belt district—economically populist and culturally traditional—that Republicans must win to claim the 40 seats necessary to take back the House.

Yet the way Critz and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee won the contest offered a reminder that the prospect of a GOP majority remains a mirage. And Tuesday’s result has Democrats breathing a sigh of relief, thinking they’ve found a formula to mitigate their losses in what will still be a difficult election season.

The playbook from the Pennsylvania special election isn’t complicated: Make the election a choice between two local candidates and not a national referendum on the Democratic Party or the state of the nation; savage the Republican from the outset and don’t let up; keep the focus on jobs and core economic issues; most important, separate yourself from your national party’s policies and politicians as necessary.

It may not be complicated -- Run as a Republican! -- but not many districts share with the Johnstown area such a special focus on the "core economic issue" of shoveling money hand over fist into one district.

Edit: Politico's selective reporting put it in my head that this district is basically a Republican one, and I wrote it up initially admitting the district "leans Republican." I have rewritten it to reflect the fact it actually leans Democratic, and pretty hard at that.

A handful of districts are like this -- socially conservative but fiscally very liberal. But few districts outside of the Virginia suburbs have such a huge, direct financial interest in a free-spending federal government.


digg this
posted by Ace at 01:39 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
pawn (on his new laptop!!!): "So would you rather have him hanging out and messi ..."

IRONGRAMPA: "Good morning, good people, from the Frigidrondacks ..."

publius, Rascally Mr. Miley (w6EFb): " Darn, missed the solstice. It was at 09:21Z, 4: ..."

Skip : "Have snow ground cover hete ..."

Aetius451AD: ""Disclaimer: Posted slightly early because I'm goi ..."

Grumpy and Recalcitrant[/i][/b]: "@18/Colin: *looks at calendar* Well whattya know ..."

Mr Aspirin Factory, red heifer owner: "Good Morning. Much driving today ..."

Just Wondering : "Birdbath status? ..."

Colin: "Happy winter everyone..... If congressional leade ..."

Buzz Adrenaline: "Horde mind. ..."

Grumpy and Recalcitrant[/i][/b]: "And now I'm awake enough to see that Buzz made the ..."

Village Idiot's Apprentice: "G'morning, all. I believe that Pixy has dieta ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64