Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Tea Partiers Need to Observe the Rules of Civil Discourse Like Liberals Do | Main | Report: Arrest Made In Times Square Bombing »
May 03, 2010

Another Correction: Fiorina's Official Statement Says She Supports the Bill

Supports it with some misgivings and worries, it seems, but that shouldn't freak people, as polls show that 62% or so of us support the law, with those same misgivings and worries.

Here's Fiorina's official statement:

U.S. Senate candidate Carly Fiorina today issued the following statement calling on President Obama to take action to secure the border, rather than attack the people of Arizona:

“Barbara Boxer and President Obama are playing politics with an issue of vital importance to the people of California. No legislation is required for the federal government to do its job and secure the border. It was the height of hypocrisy for President Obama to attack the people of Arizona in light of his refusal to use his presidential powers to secure our borders. Barbara Boxer should do her job by asking President Obama and the federal government to do their jobs.

“Instead of vilifying the people of Arizona, we should be demanding that the federal government do its job and secure the border. The federal government has failed to uphold its most basic function – ensuring the safety and security of its citizens. The Arizona law is a reflection of the outrage felt by the state’s residents, and it underscores the need for the federal government to make border security a top priority.

“While I do believe it is problematic when states take on responsibilities of the federal government, the people of Arizona are justified in their frustration, and I support their efforts to protect their citizens. The exact wording of the law says officials ‘may not solely consider race, color or national origin’ in its implementation, and I am confident it can be enforced responsibly. It is my hope that this bill serves only as an interim measure until the federal government takes the right kind of action to secure our border.”

I think she's talking in a very nuanced way which is why reporters keep reporting contradictory stuff about whether she supports the law or not. But unless she equivocates the heart of the statement away, it seems like she supports the law.

I don't think nuance is a bad thing on this issue -- indeed, the only way a politician is going to sell this is in a more-in-regret-than-anger sort of way. People insisting that politicians not only support this, but do so eagerly, are basically asking politicians to cut their throats.

Conservatives get pretty hardened in our positions, partly because we got so sick of the media and left shellacking us about not caring sufficiently about this or that that we ultimately sometimes start saying, "You know what? You're right, I don't care. FYNQ."

What we really mean is that we're pissed off at being instructed in not caring about the environment or whatever it is this week.

But average voters want to be reassured that a politician does care about stuff even as they vote for tough stuff. It makes sense for a pol casting an pro-oil-exploration to talk up how much he cares> about otters, for instance.

And it makes sense for a politician supporting a tough illegal immigration stance, which will inconvenience and stress a lot of people, to talk about caring for those people.

If you're coming down 99% on one side of an issue substantively, it helps to balance that out with a few rhetorical nods to the other side of the see-saw. Rhetoric doesn't cost nothin'.

The opposite position is to say I support this law and I don't care who it hurts, which is fine if that's what you really think, but a pretty dumb message to insist a politician go into an election with.

digg this
posted by Ace at 11:15 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
JQ: "At https://ai.mee.nu Pixy is already up. But not ..."

m: "At https://ai.mee.nu Pixy is already up. But not ..."

m: "367 Cut off from her social and creative communiti ..."

JQ: "I guess da fwench citizens cannot own their own pe ..."

Skip: "Camping did you see the rest of Fall of Minneapoli ..."

Ciampino - Batman and Robin after the steamroller? Flatman and Ribbon?: "513 478 Well let me give you some staple food. Po ..."

JQ: "We, once upon a time, had a contract with Da Fwenc ..."

m: "478 Well let me give you some staple food. Poste ..."

JQ: "When I w*rked at ammo factory, we had guests from ..."

Ciampino - Batman and Robin after the steamroller? Flatman and Ribbon.: "Those Ospreys are nasty, even from development day ..."

MikeN: "Why should Biden acknowledge a kid by a stripper? ..."

Nakliye: "Hello, i think that i saw you visited my website t ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64