Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
Coakley's internal poll last night, I've been told, showed her barely ahead, 46 to 44 percent. The momentum clearly favors Brown, and one very smart Massachusetts Democrat I know told me this morning that "this may be too far gone to recover."
Geraghty takes this with a grain of salt, and notes that if Coakley is threatened but not truly doomed, maybe this is the sort of message she wants out there. After all, as has been noted again and again (and h/t to Allah for noting it first), Brown's original best chance of victory consisted of his mounting a stealth insurgency which snuck up on Coakley in the 24 hours before the election, giving her no chance to adjust.
Obviously, if that was Plan A, Plan A has gone to shit. The word is out there. Boy, is the word out there. And Democrats are now fully warned this is officially a Big Important Race.
Be that as it may, I'm pretty psyched about Plan B: Have a big turnout election in which Democrats are suitably alerted and yet still beat 'em.
I don't know if Coakley really would deliberately leak a close poll. Or that a Democrat would try to "help" her by saying she's already almost too far gone to help. That flies in the face of conventional wisdom, where you're always supposed to project confidence and a lead.
I think maybe she's simply cratering. A preference cascade, as Glenn Reynolds introduced me to a while ago: When people aren't aware there are other choices available, or are somehow bullied into thinking only one choice is socially acceptable, they will falsify their preferences and trick themselves, even, into thinking they prefer the one available option.
However, once they are alerted to the fact that another choice is possible (and permissible), suddenly all those falsified preferences reverse themselves in a "preference cascade" and huge shifts in public opinion take place in the space of days.
I can't really tell, but I think Coakley is cratering very, very badly, and probably has gone from 65% to 45% support in ten or fourteen days. That 20% that flipped never really supported her. They just didn't really grasp that another option was available.
I've been listening to this a bit recently, and I think of this as a Moron's Anthem for the Brown Campaign.
Throw it on the ground.
Also from Geraghty: Michael Graham's parody of all of the anti-Scott-Brown ads:
NOTE: The poll numbers mentioned above were from polling that took place before TimeShareGate. They are likely now meaningless, and Coakley almost certainly enjoys a 20 point lead again.