« ACORN Assists 'Pimp', 'Prostitute' in Scamming IRS |
Main
|
Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility Opens Inquiry Into Black Panther Non-Prosecutions »
September 10, 2009
NYT: We Didn't Cover Van Jones Because We Were "Short-Staffed"
Really? Really?
[NYT Managing Editor Jill Abramson:] Why? One reason was that our Washington bureau was somewhat short-staffed during the height of the pre-Labor Day vacation period. This is not an excuse. Another is that despite being a so-called "czar," Mr. Jones was not a high-ranking official. Nevertheless, we should have been paying closer attention.
It's good that Abramson quickly owns up to missing the story, but hard to talk about being short-staffed when the Times still has a newsroom of about 1,300 people.
In an update, he's reminded that when the NYT refused to cover Chas Freeman's flame-out as National Intelligence Council chair (due to anti-Israel animus and other such things), the NYT similarly claimed Freeman wasn't a high-enough ranking (would-be) official for it to spare its precious journalistic resources for.
The National Intelligence Council chairman. Kinda sounds important.
Thanks to ArthurK.