Prop 8 Day of Decision
Prop 8 Upheld; 18,000 Existing Gay Marriages Still Valid
| Main | The Case of the Vanishing Millionaire
May 26, 2009

About Judicial Activism

One more thing, just to be a grouchy sonuvagun. To all the silly folks who wrote about lawless and oblivious judicial tyrants and the inevitable Gay Agenda of the California Supreme Court: nice job. You sure nailed that one while simultaneously undermining the rule of law.

Look, there's a reason we have courts and laws and constitutions. Decisions of the courts are not "arbitrary." With very few exceptions, judges and juries do their best to rule justly according to the law. But the judiciary is a lot like a computer. You put good laws in, you get good rulings out. You put shit in and the whole place turns into a sewer. (E.g., the endless environmental litigation).

Part of that is some inherent ambiguity in the English language. Hence the mixed decision we got today, upholding the Prop 8 AND the already existing marriages. Often legislators are not clear about what a law is supposed to do. Frequently the courts are called on figure out what to do about changing technologies and the law (e.g. what do we do about the Fourth Amendment and email?)

And the reason this attitude pisses me off so much is because it undermines our system of government and our system of justice. If it is true that there's nothing we can do except bow down to our judicial overlords then we might as well shut up and die or rise up in revolution. If you believe that our laws and constitutions are meaningless then you might as well lay down and die or rise up in revolution.

I don't believe that our options are so extreme and California (yes, CALIFORNIA!) proved it in November and today. Our laws and constitutions are not meaningless. And our courts are not so broken as people claim. The justice system works and works well most of the time. Should we tweak it with appropriate legislation (and props, where possible) and by appointing hard-working minimalist judges? Hell yeah. But exclaiming every time a court decision goes the other way that "the activist black-robed tyrants are at it again" undermines the very point that laws exist for a reason.

There would have been no point to passing Prop 8 if people truly believed that laws and constitutions have no meaning.

More importantly: if it were true that they were activist black-robed tyrants when they ruled against us then it is equally true that they are activist black-robed tyrants when they rule for us. It's the same judges. Nothing has changed except now we like the ruling. So make your choice: either the courts generally work and we should stay the course or the courts are arbitrary, results-oriented tyrannies and we should burn the whole place down. But you can't do both. Make your choice.

Update: Welcome GayPatriot readers. There's lots more today, including posts on Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Alito and one more on Prop 8. Apparently it's an unofficial Law Day here at the blog.

digg this
posted by Gabriel Malor at 01:18 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Ashley Judd's Puffy Scamper: "Boy, Joy Behar saying the audience can ask them an ..."

naturalfake: " Ana "Refrigerator" Navarro looks like she's read ..."

TheJamesMadison, finding religion in the USSR with Andrei: "478 I got put in Twitmo for, and I am not making t ..."

Karen: "I got China Flu end of August. They told me to tak ..."

Tim Riggins: "Chauvin "trial" was obscenely, ridiculously unjust ..."

Duke Lowell : "Why wouldn't they schedule the rapid test so they ..."

banana Dream: ">>> And yes, Ana is...thick. An obvious COVID como ..."

artisanal ette: "[i]MTG heckles Democrats photo op. ..."

alexthechick - boobs and hysteria: "MP4, we will definitely try. [i] I heard you got ..."

its an op, m'kay, ops are bad, m'kay: "But it nicely illustrated how degraded beyond reco ..."

Ana Navarro: "[i]It would have been cool if there were trap door ..."

Lizzy[/i]: ">> I hope the next President gives the border patr ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64