Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« Top Headline Comments 05-22-09 | Main | FiAF- Holiday Weekend Edition »
May 22, 2009

Justice Breyer Suggests Cabinet Position for Judges...Because They Need Political Clout; or
Justice Breyer Is A Fucking Lunatic*

Just exactly what the headline says:

The talk of a Cabinet post was prompted by an audience member who asked the panel about judicial pay raises -- or the recent lack thereof. Breyer pointed out that even though federal law provides a cost-of-living increase to sitting judges, Congress has consistently voted to cancel the pay hike. The problem isn't the law, he said, but the fact that judges -- even on the high court -- lack political clout.

"When I was on the Judiciary Committee in the staff, I received a phone call one day from Warren Burger, the chief justice of the United States," Breyer recalled. "And he spoke to me and asked me about a bill that was relevant. I thought after, Why is he calling me? And the reason is that no one else would talk to him."

Breyer argued that despite concerns about separation of powers, there should be "a person with political responsibility" in the Cabinet to express the judiciary's viewpoint directly to the president. He compared the position to that of lord chancellor in England.

When the issue is limited to things like judicial pay increases, (lower) court expansion, and other employment-related issues this seems like no big deal. After all, judges can't unionize and it wouldn't be a bad idea to give them a voice. (Although a Cabinet position for that seems like a major overreach.)

But his suggestion that the purpose of the position would be to make ex parte communications with a frequent litigant in the Supreme Court--"ask about a bill that was relevant", "express the judiciary's viewpoint directly"--he's completely lost his mind. It is the job of the litigants to raise and explore relevant issues. And the judiciary should bee keeping its "viewpoint" to itself. As conservatives have to keep reminding Leftists in black robes, it is not the job of the courts to set policy. The Constitution commits that to Congress and the President.

*Alternative headline suggested by DrewM. He really knows how to express the blog's viewpoint directly.






Recent Comments
Anonymous Rogue in Kalifornistan (ARiK): "You're right on time, Blond M. Good Night ever ..."

IRONGRAMPA: "Made a small cherry pie from scratch the other day ..."

Blonde Morticia: "Hi, everyone! Am I late? ..."

apply for jordan e-visa: "I used to be recommended this website through my c ..."

JQ: "Thanks, Adriane. Better than before, for sure. ..."

Adriane the Bah Humbug Critic . . . : "Iirc - fish eyes are a source of fresh water when ..."

Adriane the Bah Humbug Critic . . . : "JQ - hope you are getting some good sleep … ..."

JQ: "The eyes. Dad ate them and smiled and said than ..."

discount nitro golf balls: "Hey very interesting blog! ..."

Weirddave: "[i]Ex FIL was a VIP military pilot. Told a story a ..."

publius, Rascally Mr. Miley (w6EFb): " Well, I discovered a little bug in how this w ..."

Login Rakyatjp: "Thank you a lot for sharing this with all of us yo ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64