Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Obama Releases Bush Admin. Memo from Just After 9/11 Justifying Warrantless Arrests of Terror Suspects | Main | T4 Trailer »
March 02, 2009

Limbaugh v. Steele, an alternate viewpoint

UPDATE: I started writing this post before the "Steele Apologizes" post went up, and had to step away from the computer for over an hour to attend to some real life issues. I hit "save" before I realized that the circle was closed, but I still think that my observations need to be made.

Far be it for me to criticize The Boss, but I'd just like to get my $0.02 in on the whole Limbaugh/Steele kerfluffle. Yes, Michael Steele needs to maintain contact with the moderates on issues, because his job is to see to the success of the Republican Party, not just conservatism. I agree that he's in an unenviable position, mainly because of the uncorrected criticism of Rush being laid out there by all the Olbermanns of the world.

With all that said, what Michael Steele DOES NOT need to do here is cede the high ground to his opponents. He's the one who used phrases like "incendiary" and "ugly" in his description of Rush's rhetoric. In my opinion, this isn't a case of Rush starting a fight; it's just Rush jumping into a fight that Mr. Steele started himself. Mr. Steele could have distanced himself from Rush without going as far as he did in that interview. Hell, I probably would have supported him doing that, for all the reasons that Ace already laid out; but what I cannot do here is support Steele when he's so obviously, stupidly and politically wrong.

These pissing matches have two sides. Yes, Rush might have laid into Mr. Steele just a little too much in today's show, but Mr. Steele set the tone by treating Rush as a clown. Think about how that plays with a significant portion of the Republican Party base. The base that works the phone banks leading up to elections. The base that knocks on doors. The base that gives money to the Party. Yeah, pissing all over that base really seems like a good idea, doesn't it? And Rush had a good point about loyalty. Rush Limbaugh went to the mat for Michael Steele when he was running for the Senate in Maryland. He was nothing but supportive of Mr. Steele's candidacy, and this is how Mr. Steele repays that debt? If this is how Michael Steele treats the man who spoke up for him to a weekly audience of millions of people, how do you think he'll treat Joe Conservative, the ham & egger who can't do any favors for him? Yeah, that worries me too. Lord knows that Michael Steele already has a couple strikes against him with the "God Squad", he really didn't need to fight this battle.

Michael Steele has an unenviable job. He's got to placate the true believers in the party while simultaneously convincing enough moderates to swing towards the GOP to win elections. After all, all the principles in the world don't add up to a cup of warm piss if you don't win enough seats to have a say in the legislation. But he's ignoring one undeniable fact of life: "Me Too" Republicanism and squishy moderation don't attract enough voters to the booths to make up for losing the base. Besides, it's my impression that moderates will respond to principled partisanship, just so long as you sell it with conviction and explain it with logical arguments. Reagan didn't beat Carter and Mondale because he didn't have any core principles, and the Republican Revolution of 1994 didn't happen because Newt Gingrich said "Whatever the Democrats are giving you, we'll give you 10% more!" No, these wins happened because the Republicans made their case and sold their principles to the majority of the voters.

You think that Reagan & the '94 Congressional class are relics of the past? Shit, military historians still study the campaigns of Julius Ceasar and Alexander the Great. Philosophers still read Plato and Socrates. These two old relics happened during MY LIFETIME. Besides, do you really want our politicians to emulate the strategies of 2006 and 2008? Reaganism is only dead if WE finish it off.

This isn't a social con/fiscal con issue. Ever read the Powerline blog? You know, the guys who thought that Pawlenty would have been a better choice for McCain's VP than Palin? Not exactly conservative bombthrowers, right? Well, they're calling out Michael Steele for his stupidity.

And while I'm here, let's talk about the "Nazi Rally" comment in Steele's interview. Yes, I know that he didn't say it. What pisses me off is that he didn't go full on hissy fit in an attempt to defend HIS OWN PEOPLE from a goddamn low-blow Nazi comparison. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the vast majority of CPAC attendees are Republicans, right? While I may think that Ron Paul and his strongest supporters are a little too friendly with the Stormfront crowd for my comfort, I sure as HELL wouldn't let some assclown comedian tar the whole crowd at CPAC as one big Nuremberg rally. Michael Steele is the chairman of the Republican Party. When he sits there nodding while some moron is comparing conservatives to The Vilest Political Movement of the mid-20th Century, he's legitimizing the comparison.

When your political opponents unjustly call members of your party Nazis, you get in their goddamn faces and let them have it. It's not too much to ask. Unless you're Michael Steele, I guess.

Summary: Ace is right, in that Michael Steele should somewhat distance himself from some of Rush Limbaugh's more strident remarks in order to preserve his influence with the middle of the roaders. What needs to be said is that Michael Steele seems to have that familiar Republican disease: He's more willing to attack conservatives than he is to go after liberals. I thought that Candidate Maverick taught us all that attacking conservatives is a loser strategy, but apparently we need to have another vicious beating administered to our party before the lesson sinks in with the Beltway Crowd.


digg this
posted by Russ from Winterset at 07:43 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
m: "27 PAGING ADMIRAL ACKBAR... Posted by: Tex Lovera ..."

Boswell: "Doesn't she look like one of the male characters i ..."

Joe Mannix (Not a cop!): "Some rich guys -- especially young ones -- still g ..."

Ciampino - real takeoff postponed: "Launch scrubbed until 1:37PM ET(?) tomorrow 3/29/2 ..."

nurse ratched : "There was a time when I thought Stephen Colbert wa ..."

Ashley Judd's Puffy Scamper: "Maybe. Sam wasn't too bad looking and he had a vas ..."

Joe Mannix (Not a cop!): "As I recall she bragged about being a freak and th ..."

J.J. Sefton: " Stephen Colbert, host of CBS' "The Late Show with ..."

Elric Blade: "197 SBF's girlfriend had the one important quality ..."

SBF's cellmate.: "So long as he keeps his mouth shut . . . . [i]P ..."

Sock Monkey * Unsynchronized: " I added a good photo of his girlfriend... Post ..."

Bret : "Let me guess…no one actually read the bill. ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64