Asian Stocks Rally On News of Alien Ship Sighting Expected in Alabama | Main | Week Six Pix
October 14, 2008

Obama's "Tax Cuts"

During the debate liveblogs, a phrase I find myself typing often is "TAX CREDITS ARE NOT TAX CUTS." It's usually in response to Barack Obama's promise to "cut taxes for 95% of Americans," a promise that as of now, has gone frustratingly unexamined by the media and largely unchallenged by the McCain campaign.

The Wall St. Journal looks at Obama's proposals, and the results aren't pretty. In addition to creating a larger de facto welfare state, the Obama tax plan would actually increase taxes on low-income and middle-class workers:

Because Mr. Obama's tax credits are phased out as incomes rise, they impose a huge "marginal" tax rate increase on low-income workers. The marginal tax rate refers to the rate on the next dollar of income earned. As the nearby chart illustrates, the marginal rate for millions of low- and middle-income workers would spike as they earn more income.

Some families with an income of $40,000 could lose up to 40 cents in vanishing credits for every additional dollar earned from working overtime or taking a new job. As public policy, this is contradictory. The tax credits are sold in the name of "making work pay," but in practice they can be a disincentive to working harder, especially if you're a lower-income couple getting raises of $1,000 or $2,000 a year.

"Spread the wealth around." This chart shows just where that wealth is going to come from:


ED-AI343_1taxcr_NS_20081008232813.gif

The effective marginal rate (what you actually end up paying) on middle-income workers is going to increase and the rate on those who make $100,000 and over is going to near-Canada levels of taxation. And as the Journal states, there's little incentive for low-income workers to increase their wage, lest they be punished with a higher effective rate.

For workers earning $45-$85, a 3% increase in the marginal rate may not seem all that bad, but consider that the average rate of inflation between 1997-2007 was about 2.5% and it's increased a bit faster this year. Many workers, however, do not receive wage increases that match the rate of inflation, which is effectively a wage reduction. Take another 3% out of those paychecks and Obama's tax cut plan could mean a 3-5% reduction in spending power for a good number of American families.

All in the name of "fairness."

Update - Link to WSJ piece added. Sorry about that.

Update II - Both Phil and pbrown disagree with the WSJ's conclusion regarding low-class taxes, and the latter makes a compelling case:

At the risk of being thought a concern troll, this conclusion doesn't quite follow from the article:

the Obama tax plan would actually increase taxes on low-income and middle-class workers

Marginal tax rates are the amount of tax you pay on the *next* dollar you earn. Let's say you had a hypothetical tax plan that guaranteed everyone made at least $30K. If you made $50K, you'd have a taxable income of $20K. If you made $30K, you'd pay no taxes at all. If you made $20K, you'd pay no taxes *and* get a $10K check from the guv'mint. This plan would *significantly* increase the marginal rates of low-income workers -- the marginal tax rate would be 100%! There would be no reason to work at all unless you could pull down considerably more than $30K. But despite the fact that you have this atrocious marginal tax rate, people earning less than $30K would still pay less in taxes than they did today. And they'd have a hell of a lot more free time!

Another example -- McCain's health care plan increases the marginal tax rates on some lower-income workers with health benefits. But it does so because the benefits themselves are counted as income. So if you made $30K and had $10K of employer-paid benefits, you'd have $40K of gross income. (Effectively, it shifts the marginal tax rate curve to the left.) But that doesn't mean his plan increasing your taxes, since the marginal rates don't account for the $5K credit.

That said, Obama is full of shit about his tax plan. President Clinton promised a middle-class tax cut that vanished soon after he was elected because of "economic conditions". The state of the federal budget today is a hell of a lot worse than it was in 1993, and I would expect to hear the same thing soon after election day. If The Messiah wins, you will soon hear talk of rich people earning "tenth of a million" instead of a "quarter of a million". Honestly, I think his tax increases on the "rich" and businesses are more about redistribution "fairness" than any potential revenue increase to the federal government.

I think the joke about free time communicates a sad truth about this tax plan: giveaways would provide low-income workers little incentive to increase their income. The punishing tax rates at the top end of the income scale makes a certain level of economic success unattractive, since you'd get to keep a much smaller percentage of your income.

digg this
posted by Slublog at 09:10 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Christopher R Taylor: "[i]Good lord Joe, get your ears checked. And 70's ..."

FenelonSpoke: "I found that review of the book with "intimate, ca ..."

Rob Crawford: ""Everyone hates the travelers." Just because yo ..."

alexthechick - Ragebunny. Hopping all around.: "OH AP, I am so sorry. Horde. Horde. *hands al ..."

Bertram Cabot, Jr.: " [i]UPITER, Florida... [/i] Don't be so upity ..."

Trump poisoned my cat: "Not-breaking news: The Left already has seceded ..."

Uriah: "The one whose wife I want to bang. Posted by: Dav ..."

J.J. Sefton: " 417 Racing With the Moonbat Posted by: Bertram C ..."

Christopher R Taylor: "[i]Country music died when most of it's classic ar ..."

Bertram Cabot, Jr.: "Racing With the Moonbat ..."

J.J. Sefton: " 414 That's nothing compared to Neptune, New Jer ..."

Banana Splits Guy - Push It If You Want: ">>> Everybody else was born on the planet Krypton ..."

Recent Entries
Search


MuNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat
Archives
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64