« Yoo's March 14 Memo |
Main
|
WarPorn? FoodPorn? It's Both: Indians Develop... Curry Bomb »
April 02, 2008
Wow
Just, wow.
Safford Middle School has a "zero tolerance" policy that prohibits possession of all drugs, including not just alcohol and illegal intoxicants but prescription medications and over-the-counter remedies, "except those for which permission to use in school has been granted." In October 2003, acting on a tip, Vice Principal Kerry Wilson found a few 400-milligram ibuprofen pills (each equivalent to two over-the-counter tablets) and one nonprescription naproxen tablet in the pockets of a student named Marissa, who claimed Savana was her source.
Savana, an honors student with no history of disciplinary trouble or drug problems, said she didn't know anything about the pills and agreed to a search of her backpack, which turned up nothing incriminating. Wilson nevertheless instructed a female secretary to strip-search Savana under the school nurse's supervision, without even bothering to contact the girl's mother.
The secretary had Savana take off all her clothing except her underwear. Then she told her to "pull her bra out and to the side and shake it, exposing her breasts," and "pull her underwear out at the crotch and shake it, exposing her pelvic area." Sometimes it's hard to tell the difference between drug warriors and child molesters.
"I was embarrassed and scared," Savana said in an affidavit, "but felt I would be in more trouble if I did not do what they asked. I held my head down so they could not see I was about to cry." She called it "the most humiliating experience I have ever had." Later, she recalled, the principal, Robert Beeman, said "he did not think the strip search was a big deal because they did not find anything."
Reason's claiming it's a 4th Amendment violation, which I'm not sure of; courts have been pretty firm on the 4th Amendment not applying to kids at school, mostly. Plus it's unclear from the facts if she "consented" by doing as instructed, or even if "consent" is a valid idea in this context. I dunno.
More likely a violation of the vague and mostly-discredited "shock the conscience" guarantee of due process under the Fifth Amendment. There aren't many times to break out that old chestnut, but this seems to be one of them.