Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« New Year's Rockin' Bloggin' Eve | Main | Scumbag-Lawyer-Keying-Marine's-Car Update: Sweet »
January 01, 2008

This Post is Really About Iowa, I Swear

Well, I just spent 8 hours at the airport and guess what, I'm still in D.C., right where I was when I started. That's an hour in the plane, waiting to leave the gate; an hour on the taxiway waiting for a mechanic; another thirty minutes back at a new gate, before asking us to deplane; and an hour there while they promised an update in "just a few more minutes."


That's when I wised up and called reservations and had them book me a flight tomorrow. Twenty minutes later they announced over the PA (cowards) that the flight was canceled and 300 people ran to wait in the customer service line behind me. I was there because I had one simple question: "How can I get my checked bag?"

No one seemed to know. This made me realize that the only United employees in the terminal on New Years Eve are those too low in terms of seniority or intelligence to get the night off. It was finally decided that the bags would be at "Carousel C in about an hour." I knew then that I needed to give up and call for a ride: Dulles has numbered baggage claim carousels. They assured me that if I didn't stick around to pick up the bag, it'd get put on a flight to LAX. Everybody cross your fingers.

So now I'm sitting on my brother's living-room couch, drinking a screwdriver while he watches something violent on TV in the guest room, my pregnant sis-in-law asleep in the bedroom. I have the clothing on my back, my laptop, and a book I've already read (History of the Lord of the Rings: Treason of Isengard, which I finished after the first hour in the plane).

Anyways, since after I finished the book, I had plenty of time to think about the Iowa contest. Specifically, what would I consider a win and what would I consider a loss.

Before I get started, I should say that, as my father recently expressed at the Fort Belvoir Officer's Club, "In the general, I will vote for a monkey if it is a Republican. Or a dog. Or a horse. Or a zebra." I agree with one exception. I will not vote for Ron Paul, even if the ghosts of Abe Lincoln and Ronald Reagan show up at the stroke of midnight tonight and tell me to. It ain't happenin'.

[Incidentally, I just noticed it's 12:09 as I type this. Happy New Year, morons.]

So what will make me happy in Iowa? A Romney win. Three months ago, I didn't think much of him. I hadn't seen him on the news shows, or heard him on Hannity. I was holding out for Giuliani and pretty much ignoring the rest. Since Giuliani isn't making Iowa part of his program, I had to go looking at the other candidates. Of the remainder, I believe Romney is the best.

Lauraw posted about McCain earlier, and I second what she said; he isn't my candidate. I'll vote for him if I have to, but I won't like it.

The other serious choice would be Thompson. But if you haven't figured it out by now, he let me down and I've never recovered from it. In June, I was a believer. I was pumped. When my parents asked me about the race, I said, "wait for Fred Thompson to get into it."

But that's when I thought he'd announce in early July. Then I started to think, "this is it," in August. And then time went on and nothing seemed to happen. He isn't unacceptable; on the contrary, he says all the right things. He just never convinced me that he will do the right things. The other Republican candidates are also saying acceptable things, but even more than that, they've got better records of actually doing things on issues that are important to me.

The final possible candidate brings me to my second question. I will consider Iowa a loss if Huckabee gets the most votes on Thursday. He's a disaster waiting to happen, not just because he's more liberal than not, and a seemingly scummy fellow on top of that, but that we'll lose even the few Republican ideals he supports because there's no way that he's going to win in the general.

There's no point in me voting for this Republican monkey if he's not going to win. If Huckabee gets the Republican nomination, our only hope is that both Paul and Bloomberg run independent and manage to draw off enough folks who would otherwise vote for the Democrat.

That's about it. I don't really care who wins or loses on the Democratic side. I suspect that Clinton will win because of the party super-delegates. That's fine, I think she'll be a good target in the general. On the other hand, Obama and Edwards have their own weak spots.

Of the three, I think Edwards will be the hardest to beat in the general because he's the most stereotypically presidential. As much as we make fun of "Silky," we know that he is just what Democratic voters like: white male, Southerner, who is a likeable lawyer who connects with victim culture. Just like Bill Clinton. Think he's too effeminate for the role? John Kerry got 59,028,111 votes. 'Nough said.

In short, I don't get a vote in Iowa. But I'd like to see Romney coming out of it strong. I'd like to see a Huckabee embarrassment, but I have no real hope for that. And the Democrats can entertain themselves quietly, out of my sight.

Worst Case Scenario [Ace]: Huckabee wins, but Giuliani wins later.

These two certainties [Huckabee winning early and taking a large number of evangelical voters; Giuliani winning in the godless, communist northeast] point to one possible outcome that should alarm Republicans of all ideological stripes — the religious and the irreligious, the right-to-lifers, the gun-rights advocates, the supply-siders, and the neoconservatives alike. A two-way knock-down-drag-out fight between Huckabee and Giuliani could completely destroy the coalition that Ronald Reagan built by combining social and economic conservatives with anti-Communists.

In one corner stands Mike Huckabee, whose campaign speaks freely of destroying the conservative movement. “It’s gone,” said Ed Rollins, his national campaign chairman. “The breakup of what was the Reagan coalition — social conservatives, defense conservatives, antitax conservatives — it doesn’t mean a whole lot to people anymore.” Naturally, Rollins points to Huckabee as the figure to form the new coalition.

This would be ugly. Really ugly. Republicans would be torn between two candidates each of whom is considered patently unacceptable by half the party.

digg this
posted by Gabriel Malor at 01:35 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
m: "27 PAGING ADMIRAL ACKBAR... Posted by: Tex Lovera ..."

Boswell: "Doesn't she look like one of the male characters i ..."

Joe Mannix (Not a cop!): "Some rich guys -- especially young ones -- still g ..."

Ciampino - real takeoff postponed: "Launch scrubbed until 1:37PM ET(?) tomorrow 3/29/2 ..."

nurse ratched : "There was a time when I thought Stephen Colbert wa ..."

Ashley Judd's Puffy Scamper: "Maybe. Sam wasn't too bad looking and he had a vas ..."

Joe Mannix (Not a cop!): "As I recall she bragged about being a freak and th ..."

J.J. Sefton: " Stephen Colbert, host of CBS' "The Late Show with ..."

Elric Blade: "197 SBF's girlfriend had the one important quality ..."

SBF's cellmate.: "So long as he keeps his mouth shut . . . . [i]P ..."

Sock Monkey * Unsynchronized: " I added a good photo of his girlfriend... Post ..."

Bret : "Let me guess…no one actually read the bill. ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64