Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
Note the, uh, suspicious and illegal coordination between the "nonpartisan" MoveOn and the Democrats on this point, one pushing a new meme and the others hungrily seizing upon it, "coordinating" their messages quite clearly despite the fact that that the tax codes forbid this.
Here's Mark Levin wondering rhetorically what would be shown if we could examine the emails back and forth between the DNC, the Clinton campaign, the Clinton Senate staff, MoveOn, and Media Matters. There is hardly any doubt all of them are breaking the law to harmonize, synthesize and synergize their political messaging. Which makes Hillary, the Democrats, George Soros and the rest of the hard left guilty of both illegal campaign contributions, breaking other laws of the FEC, and general tax fraud. Which is about as surprising as a photo of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in a bathroom stall with George Michael.
I noted back in 2004, the last time Harkin made this an issue, that the press was giving him a pass. Will it do so again? And why are the Democrats letting Harkin, of all people, get out front on this issue?
Sometimes the difference between a rhetorical question and a retarded one is pretty blurry.
They're letting him get in front of it because they know there's no chance of any downside to doing so. The Deciders have decided it's not an issue. Or at least it's only an issue in the way they say it is.