Sponsored Content
« Kagan: The Surge Is Working, But The Media Has No Back-Up Plan | Main | Native American Super-Tracker "Shadow Wolves" On Hunt For Bin Ladin? »
March 12, 2007

Bush Caves On Earmarks

The OMB was supposed to release a report noting who had requested each earmark and how much each cost the taxpayer. And, of course, who benefits from each.

Part of the campaign to inform the public how appropriatotrs spending your money, and paying off well-heeled contributors, in the darkness, without notice, and without your consent as voting citizens.


When I heard last week from Hill sources that the White House congressional liason staff was pressuring OMB Director Rob Portman to not release all of the earmarks requested by Members of Congress to executive agencies under the FY2005 budget, I called the OMB press office.

When I asked for a copy of the earmark database and copies of all correspondence between OMB and executive branch officials and Members and Hill staff, I was promised a call-back from a senior OMB spokesman. Not surprisingly, that call never came.

Now this morning, word is circulating on the Hill that the Bush administration is going to release only a limited database of earmarks later today or maybe no database at all, but just aggregate or summary data.

Why? Fear of "offending" Congressional appropriators.

Perhaps it is Bush's calculation that appeasing the porkers will buy the goodwill necessary to stave off attempts at defunding the war.

But that's never worked before, and it's not going to work now.

Bush isn't a very good President when it's all said and done, is he? His early life, marked chiefly by taking the path of least resistance, is a fair preamble to his presidency.

Yes, the war is a good counter-example; but even his relatively steadfast position on that has been marked, often tragically, by half-steps and ill-advised compromises.

Tom Coburn, meanwhile, calls the Senate Democrats out on violating the new law of earmark transparency:

March 12, 2007

The Honorable Robert C. Byrd


Senate Appropriations Committee

The Capitol, S-131

Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Chairman Byrd:

As the fiscal year 2008 appropriations season begins, I write to seek your guidance on how the earmarking process will be reformed this year. While I am encouraged by your pledge to “place a moratorium on all earmarks until a reformed process is put in place,” I am very concerned that Senate Appropriations subcommittees are actively soliciting earmark requests even though a “reformed process” is not in place. As you know, even though the Senate unanimously passed strong earmark transparency requirements, no earmark reforms have yet been enacted. The American public demanded greater transparency and accountability in earmarking, yet nothing has been done to shed more light on this process.

Section 103 of S.1 requires the disclosure of several types of information related to earmarks, including the name of the Member requesting the earmark, the name and address of the intended recipient of the earmark, the purpose of the earmark, and a certification that the requesting Member and his or her spouse have no financial interest in the requested earmark. Although the Senate was unanimous in its support of these disclosure requirements, several earmark solicitation forms recently sent by Senate Appropriations subcommittees do not require the disclosure of many required items.

For example, the fiscal year 2008 earmark solicitation form sent by the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee does not require the disclosure of the name or address of the intended earmark recipient, nor does it require certification that the requesting Member has no financial interest in the requested earmark. The fiscal year 2008 earmark solicitation forms from the Interior Appropriations Subcommittee and the Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee neglect to require the disclosure of these same items. Furthermore, as far as I can determine, the only requirement of the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Subcommittee is that earmark requests be placed by April 13, 2007.

I am extremely disappointed and troubled by the fact that Senate Appropriations Subcommittees are soliciting earmarks but not complying with the basic requirements of Section 103 of S.1. In the absence of final Senate enactment of meaningful earmark reform, the Senate Appropriations Committee has the ability to make earmark information public immediately. The Committee’s failure to make earmark information public would make a mockery of recently passed earmark reforms and would suggest to taxpayers that the Senate wants to continue to earmark funds in secret. In addition, pursuant to Section 103 of S.1, I believe that the Committee should immediately require all Members who request earmarks to certify in writing that they have no financial interest in the requested earmark. Following the imprisonment of a Member of Congress for selling earmarks in exchange for bribes, the American public needs to know that its elected officials are not using public office for private gain.

While I am pleased by your announced moratorium on earmarks and encouraged by your willingness to tackle such a difficult problem, I am worried that many wish to avoid any new transparency requirements. Please let me know how I can help you to reform the current process. Like you, I want to implement an “accountable, above-board, transparent process for funding decisions and put an end to the abuses that have harmed the credibility of Congress.” Your experience and institutional knowledge are invaluable, and I look forward to working with you to ensure that all taxpayer dollars are expended in a fully transparent and responsible manner.


Tom Coburn, M.D.

digg this
posted by Ace at 03:12 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Joe XiDen - I miss Delta Variant : "Jewish support for Biden will plummet from 92.81% ..."

that guy who remembers things: "[i] What happened to Chrissie Evert? Posted by: d ..."

DB: ">>Jill Biden tells @AP healing a nation became one ..."

Moron Robbie - no significant difference in ability to spread or catch regardless of vax status : "Who was the woman player who was politely asked to ..."

Sponge - Saying Ashli Babbitt: "[i]Who was the woman player who was politely asked ..."

redridinghood: "Gregg, Chief Propaganda Officer SMC @realgreggd ..."

Anti doesn't matter : "Yeah, but her face could stop a truck. In fact, I ..."

N.L. Urker, getting serious about lurking: "It makes me sad that Eugenie Bouchard has fallen o ..."

AlaBAMA : "Come on guys. It's basically 50/50 guess. Eventual ..."

Ted Torgerson: "Sandy Kofax, Steve Stone, Kenny Holtzman, Vida Blu ..."

Boswell: "or beg for scraps at traffic signals Posted by: B ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: " I bet British and US law enforcement knew about ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64