Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Mildly Funny | Main | Grim Milestone: 3000+ Casualties Since 2006
March 03, 2007

Romney Knocks Giuliani For Liberal Views

Althouse thinks this line of critique will be ineffective, as everyone already knows where Giuliani stands on these issues.

Not so. A majority of Republicans, for example, either don't know Giuliani's position on abortion or incorrectly believe he's pro-life.

The attack will be somewhat less effective due to the fact that Romney himself held these views just a few years ago. Giuliani can suggest he may "evolve" as Romney did in just a few short years.

Social con candidates like Brownback and (presumably) Gilmore are entering now as dark horses, in case the front-runners falter.

But Giuliani may not falter after all. I hope this isn't telling tales out of school, but Eric Erickson of RedState related a story about his wife's Bible study club. His wife is strongly pro-life, as are the other ten women in the group. And they're all supporting Giuliani -- enthusiastically, in most cases. Why? Well, they think he'll win the war.

The plural of anecdote is not "data" and all that, but still, Giuliani pretty much seems to be the talk of CPAC, and even strong social cons aren't rabidly against him. In fact, most of them seem to approve of him as a candidate, if not enthusiastically so.

On the other hand, there's the hapless John McCain.

Here's an NYT piece on yesterday's speeches.

Spot the lie:

Mr. Giuliani focused on what has been one of his electoral strengths: his performance as mayor after the attacks on the World Trade Center. Mr. Giuliani departed from a standard criticism of President Bill Clinton by Republicans, who have faulted him for not recognizing the emerging terrorist threat after the first attack on the World Trade Center and the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole.

I dont blame people for that, he said. I dont think its instructive or helpful to do that.

The deliberate deception here is that Giuliani immediately followed this statement up by saying (paraphrased), "But for those who continue to support the same pre-9/11 law-enforcement responses to terrorism after 9/11 -- they can and should be blamed for that."

But the NYT reporter apparently only caught the part of the quote that seemed to absove his heroes for their sleepwalking through the escalation of 90's megaterrorism. How he managed to miss that this entire passage was about the Democrats' desire to go back to the pre-9/11 Clinton paradigm of law enforcement plus half-hearted and haphazard missile strikes is beyond me.

But then, I guess we all hear what we want to hear.

They're simply dishonest. And they wonder why their subscription base is dropping so precipitously.

Not Sure If This Is True:

Mr. Giuliani arrived to a rousing reception, but the room grew silent and restless as Mr. Giuliani wandered through a speech that lasted 40 minutes. By contrast, Mr. Romney arrived to a much more subdued reception but left to rousing applause.

I can't tell, because I wasn't in the room, alas. Certainly the applause kept coming for Giuliani -- I noticed no "restlessness," and everyone in the auditorium was glued to the TVs -- but it did seem that Romney delivered a livelier, more rousing speech.

But the speeches were different -- Giuliani's speech wasn't a full-blown stump-speech; it was more of a discussion of issues as other, noncandidate speakers delievered. Romney's speech was also SRO, but not everyone in the joint was glued to TVs to watch him speak.

NYT Full of... It: So says Fausta, who was in the room when Giuliani delivered his speech. She notes the speech ended with a standing ovation.

JackStraw points out that most people spoke glowingly of Romney's speech. It was a strong, rousing speech. I certainly thought it was miles away better than his NR speech. Eric from Red State is one of those greatly impressed by Mitt, and has a transcript of his full speech.

I still think I preferred Giuliani's -- partly because of my obvious bias, but also partly because I'm still kind of annoyed the presidential campaign has already begun, and preferred Giuliani's more low-key, I'm-not-really-a-candidate-just-giving-a-talk-here style, at least at this point in early March 2007.

By the way, the whole Red State crew is covering this thing amazingly well.

digg this
posted by Ace at 04:25 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
GOP sux: "Or it's someone who makes that freak who was in ch ..."

Catch Thirty-Thr33: "Sure. Remember 84 when they were trying to introdu ..."

Soothsayer's mostly accurate history: " Sounds just like .38 Special ..."

BlackOrchid: "seriously tho - do we really have to wait until 20 ..."

SloPitch Whiffer: "721 I just saw the waterfall video. My professiona ..."

Propaganda Mills: "764 763 Remember, pre 1996, when the conventions g ..."

Mister Ghost: "Yashar Ali 🐘 @yashar BREAKING via WSJ ..."

mnw: "I hate that band noise behind the interviews. ..."

Catch Thirty-Thr33: "That's even worse than the unconsitutional "rank-c ..."

Jordan61: "no the photo is at the link, at the Babylon bee. I ..."

weft cut-loop[/i][/b] [/s]: "Bok-bok-baagaaawk~! d you be open to doing [ano ..."

BurtTC: "Illinois Morons, hope you're all OK with the storm ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64