Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Mitt Romney Underwhelms At National Review Symposium | Main | Paleontologists: Humans Committed Genocide Against The Hobbits »
January 29, 2007

Giuliani V. Romney

I hope I'm not letting forbidden cats out of the embargo bag when I mention that an NR guy told me that the last speaker was planned, for some time, to be Rudy Giuliani, who later backed-out and was replaced by Tony Snow. (Who rocked the house -- and more on that later.) This NR guy (who I won't name, as he wasn't speaking on the record, and also because I forget his name) said he figured Giuliani had decided not to attend because he hadn't figured out how to address a truly conservative audience yet, nor had he decided yet how he was going to handle his famously liberal positions on gay marriage, immigration, guns, and abortions.

I objected that he could just deliver a similar speech to his RNC address, and that the delegates at the RNC were every bit as conservative (if not more so) than those attending the NR Symposium; then again, he was addressing the RNC in support of Bush, whereas he'd be addressing the Symposium in support of himself. A big difference, I guess.

This leads to my problems with Giuliani and Romney.

Romney's Boy Scout flag coda seemed a bit synthetic to me -- an attempt to evoke, weakly, the same emotions many Americans associate with the Steel Cross that remained standing in the aftermath of 9/11. It's not as powerful a symbol, nor is it associated with as epochal an event, but it's somewhat similar. Same but different. And also, a little bit forced. An echo, but a quiet, tinny sort of echo.

My one big problem with Romney is that, policy-wise, I have no problems with him whatsoever. I began to get interested in him when I began to notice that I liked everything he said. He just didn't seem to strike a single false note.

After a time, however, I began to find the lack of false notes to be itself a false note -- is it just pure coincidence that Mitt Romney happens to (now) be a passionate supporter of virtually every consensus position of the conservative primary-voter mainstream? Did he just sort of luck into that happy circumstance?

Like the flag story, is Romney himself a bit too synthetic for his own good?

Authenticity is greatly overvalued in candidates. After all, we're electing a government official, not a drinking buddy. Who cares if someone is altogether sincere in his beliefs so long as he votes the way you want him to? Is it better to have a president who sincerely, authentically puts forward policies you object to or one who insincerely, inauthentically champions policies you prefer?

Still, if there's one thing that keeps me off the Romney train, it's the suspicion that I don't really know what Romney's core is. Perhaps it'll turn out Romney's core is simply whatever will please the conservative base -- which would be fine enough, I suppose, but there is something on a gut, drinking-buddy-evaluation level that wants to know what he's really all about.

On the other hand, there's Giuliani. I have long believed that Giuliani would begin walking back his very liberal positions towards something more palatable to conservative primary voters. I never expected him to completely renounce his former positions nor reverse himself completely; I did, however, expect him to begin changing his positions on social hot-button issues from liberal to moderate, at the very least. No, he can't out-conservative Sam Brownback. But could he at least try to to out-conservative Dennis Kucinich?

Why he hasn't done this yet I don't know. Maybe it's just because he's a proud man, and he's delaying doing something that's going to cause a lot of controversy and mocking -- Bush the Elder was savaged for his sudden coversion to the pro-life cause when he joined the Reagan ticket, and I can't imagine Giuliani is looking forward to his own time in the fire.

Or it could be that he just actually believes in those positions too strongly to change them.

Or it could be that he wants to gamble and see if he can win the Republican primaries still having those positions, and then go on to the general elections holding them, where they'll actually help him a bit. (After all, if you've already got the Republicans on board, having more liberal positions can only help with Independents and even some Democrats.)

If he's thinking along the latter lines, he's fooling himself. As a dedicated Rudy guy, sure, I'll vote for him, assuming his candidacy is even still alive when voting comes to my state. But I won't consider him a truly serious candidate, and my real candidate will be my Plan B guy, whoever I think can actually win the nomination, even if I like him a little bit less.

I imagine the Giuliani people keep their eyes on blogs, especially a pro-Giuliani one like this one, so let confirm to Giuliani's guys what they already know but seem to be resistant to believing: Yes, indeed, abortion is a very important issue to Republican stalwarts. Trust me, guys, this blog isn't exactly the most Christinist of venues, and even here, the pro-life side has both the numbers and the passion. The sooner you confront this reality, the better.

So the two guys I'm most supportive of seem to have opposite problems. Romney's positions seem suspiciously carefully-tailored to win in the South Carolina primary, whereas Giuliani's seem to win... well, not really anywhere, really, except maybe in New York in the general elections, which he'll never make it to anyhow if he holds to his current stances. If Romney's a bit too synthetic and shameless about adapting his positions to Republican primary voters, Giuliani's too proud and "authentic" for his own political good. I could stand to see Romney taking a couple of unexpected positions I don't necessarily agree with, and I sure the hell could stand to see Rudy trying to meet Republican primary voters at least half-way.

We don't need Giuiliani to be a True Believer, but at least need a little lip-service, I think. A little bit of insincerity goes a long way.



digg this
posted by Ace at 01:51 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "Morning, insomaniacals! I actually slept about en ..."

Braenyard: "Stefanie Lambert, an election integrity attorney w ..."

Epobirs: "The offending file(s) will usually make itself obv ..."

Epobirs: "Max Gail (Wojo) is apparently still around. He has ..."

Braenyard: "I don't mind renaming a file but going through 50 ..."

Epobirs: "New Tricks was more a more conventional police pro ..."

Epobirs: "I've usually gotten around the problem by copying ..."

Jim[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "New Tricks was the Brit version of Barney Miller, ..."

irongrampa: "Sitting here listening to music, mostly oldies tha ..."

publius, Rascally Mr. Miley (w6EFb): ">> says you have 3 files with names too long for ..."

Epobirs: "New Tricks was on a lot longer than that. 2003-201 ..."

Braenyard: "Those 4bbl Holley's are light on the gas if you're ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64