« South Park And The Power Of Media Shaming | Main | Appropriations Committees Resist Further Necessary Reforms To Corrupt Earmark Process »
September 14, 2006

Would-be Child Molester Back on the Streets in Nevada [Sobek]

Nevada has a "using technology to lure children" statute, basically designed to get on-line predators who try to meet up with under-age kids and molest them. The statute reads in pertinent part:

1. . . . [A] person shall not knowingly contact or communicate with or attempt to contact or communicate with a child who is less than 16 years of age and who is at least 5 years younger than the person with the intent to persuade, lure or transport the child away from his home or from any location known to his parent or guardian or other person legally responsible for the child to a place other than where the child is located, for any purpose:

(a) Without the express consent of the parent or guardian or other person legally responsible for the child; and

(b) With the intent to avoid the consent of the parent or guardian or other person legally responsible for the child.

Today the Nevada Supremes upheld the dismissal of an indictment against Anthony John Colosimo, a Reno resident, who thought the 41-year-old cop he was chatting with was a 14-year-old girl named "Sammi."


The District Court dismissed the indictment for a few reasons: the statute was unconstitutional under the First Amendment and the Interstate Commerce Clause, the cops entrapped Colosimo, and he did not "knowingly" violate the statute because he was never chatting with a real 14-year-old girl. The Supremes affirmed. They said β€œ[t]he inducement of minors to engage in illegal sexual activity enjoys no First Amendment protection,” there was no undue burden on interstate commerce by cracking down on pedophiles, and the Defendant was clearly not entrapped: the Court said that the fact that Colosimo asked Sammi whether she were a cop did not consitute "reluctance."

But they upheld the dismissal of the indictment because he couldn't "knowingly" contact a 14-year-old when in fact he did no such thing (that we know of). They distinguished a 9th Circuit case that upheld a conviction for attempt, because you can knowingly attempt to lure a child and be wrong about the identity.

Dave from Garfield Ridge did a post last April after a DHS official was arrested for basically the same thing: trying to seduce what turned out to be a cop. He prefaced his comments with an "I have a feeling this post is going to get me into a *LOT* of trouble." After noting his disdain for pedophilia, he said:

can anyone tell me what the crime is here? Who is the victim here? There was no 14 year old girl involved, there was a "girl" in a Sheriff's uniform. Nothing in the story suggests that the "hard-core pornographic movie clips" were illegal, i.e. child porn.

So, what we have is a man arrested for talking dirty to an adult, and for sending presumably legal porn to an adult. Hell, if that's all there is to this, I should be doing 10 to life right now.

In Nevada, it's one to ten. FYI.

In online pedophilia cases, the dividing line between a "thought crime" and a real crime is very narrow. Mr. Doyle obviously seemed to have a thing for young girls, but what if he was acting out a fantasy of his that he'd never actually follow through on? I personally don't believe for a second that this is the case here (I suspect the worst about this scuzzbag), but again, there was no young girl involved, there was no illegal pornography involved, and there wasn't even a meeting to confirm intent, no infamous "dirty old man shows up in the Waffle House parking lot to meet the Polk County Sheriff" event. And even those meetings don't really confirm intent unless there's an actual minor involved, do they?

(More at Dave's).

In Nevada, it looks like a simple case of poor draftsmanship. The outcome would have been totally different had the legislature defined the word "intentionally" to include "when the dude thinks it's a kid but it's really a cop." Or words to that effect. But I suppose the question, in light of Dave's comments, is should the statute be amended at all?

digg this
posted by Ace at 03:36 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Barack Hussein Obama: "[i]A simple "Thank you" isn't enough is it?[/i] ..."

Iron Mike Golf: "[i]22 Was at an event yesterday and an ex-Ranger w ..."

logprof cranking up Henry's Dress: "Style guide: It's Scooby-doo, not Scooby-do. ..."

redc1c4 [/b] [/i] [/s] [/u]: "FYI: i blew up the pic, and the gravestone in fron ..."

Farmer Bob: "49- Dad was stationed at Albany til 73. We lived i ..."

weirdflunky: "If you ever find yourself in Madison, Ga you shoul ..."

ALH: "(BOO) ..."

mr_jack: "One-hit authors: I have one for you. My wife an ..."

Professor Chaos aka Gumdrop Gorilla: "I remember a Scooby-do episode that dealt with tre ..."

Iblis: "[i]282 To me, and I stand to be corrected, the odd ..."

Ripley: "Gen. Kellys remarks will be be lost on hard left&n ..."

ALH: "135 Sometimes it's not. 8) ..."

Recent Entries
Search


MuNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat
Archives
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64