Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Speaking of Flaming Pieces of Shit... | Main | Bush To Speak With Kazakh President, Over Diplomatic Row Created By "Borat" Character »
September 13, 2006

Pallywood on Trial? [Sobek]

Michelle Malkin has a long post up about the impending civil case by France-2 television against critics of the so-called Muhammad Dura shooting. Michelle's links give more detail, but the short version is this:

In 2000, a Palestinian cameraman got footage of what appeared to be a Palestinian boy being deliberately targeted by Israeli soldiers, and shot dead. The 55-second video was broadcast around the world, did irreparable damage to Israel's reputation, and sparked a retaliatory Intifada which resulted in the deaths of 500 Israelis.

Problem is, the video was a fake.

Oh well, no harm done, right? I mean, other than all those dead Jews.

But France-2 television (which is owned by the government) has now filed a lawsuit against critics of the film who have shown it to be fake. Anyone with any integrity would admit the mistake and apologize for being an instrument in the deaths of so many innocent civilians, but we're talking about the French, here. So a lawsuit it is.

The reason I'm writing this post is not just to re-hash Michelle's work. As it turns out, I studied a bit of French law at school, including defamation law. It's a bit different from American defamation law:

Diffamation consists of the publication by the defendant of facts relating to the plaintiff, whether these facts are true or not; injure, on the other hand, consists of the use of 'outrageous expressions' which do not impute particular facts to the defendant (one leading text gives the calling of anothere a 'pedantic prig' as an example!). Both offences require that the defendant was malicious or in bad faith in making the statement in question, though such a 'culpable intention' is deemed to exist in the absence of proof of good faith, a proof which the courts have proved reluctant to admit. More surprisingly, truth is a defence only as regards those imputations which relate to a person's public life: a person's private life is protected even from truthful imputations. In accordance with the general rule, a defendant who commits either of these offenses will be liable in damages to anyone who suffers harm as a result...

From Bell et al., "Principles of French Law," at 368 (emphasis added).

In other words, even if what you say is true, you can be liable for damages is it's mean. I swear, if there is a more craven, feminized, cowardly group of people on the face of this Earth (the American Democratic party excepted), I have yet to hear of it. And in this case, the courts (which are part of the same government that owns the plaintiff television station) can vindicate France-2 (and by extension, the murders of 500 Israelis) simply on the basis that true statements were too "outrageous."

By contrast, the Nevada rule on defamation (which isn't wildly different from any other American jurisdiction) is: a) A false and defamatory statement of fact, of or concerning the defendant, b) an unprivileged publication to a third party, c) fault, amounting to at least negligence, and d) actual or implied damages. That's the American way: if what you're saying is true, our laws give you absolute protection, and the other person has to suck it up.


digg this
posted by Ace at 03:33 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Erebus-ex-killer whale: "The GOP should also run ads pointing out that Amet ..."

Lizzy[/i]: "No country can absorb so many immigrants, legal or ..."

Doof: "CBD is a Jewish Christian Nationalist? Akin to a ..."

Big Pharma Says But Some Merch, Hoss: "270 I’m sure there are legit cases of people ..."

"Perfessor" Squirrel: "When the collapse happens, will the illegal immigr ..."

Skip: "Immigrants of old would have learned English, cha ..."

OrangeEnt: " No more drivers licenses for illegals!!! Posted ..."

Lizzy[/i]: "6. Remove the d@mn poem from the base of the Statu ..."

Albanian simps gonna simp, simp, simp: "250 200 I heard some pop strumpet on the radio. Sh ..."

Diogenes: "This is the existential problem of our lifetimes. ..."

thatcrazyjerseyguy now with twice the crazy: "Looks like Mike Lindell ("election denier", as des ..."

18-1: "I'd add - prosecute any government worker that app ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64