Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow

Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info

« Bleg: Glenn Greenwald Posts From February 2006 | Main | Comments... I Get Comments »
July 22, 2006

Nail. Coffin. Some Hammering Required. (But not muuuch...)

This is it. This is the Rosetta Stone.

Dan Riehl sent me this link, in which he demonstrates "Rick Ellensburg" making the same points as Glenn Greenwald, using much the same language, only hours after Greenwald posted.

"Do Greenwald's fans have his posts tattooed on his arms?" he wonders.

It's a little worse than that, Dan.

Because "Rick Ellensburg," Certified Greenwald Fan, actually makes one of Greenwald's statements, in near-identical laguage, BEFORE Glenn Greenwald does on his own post.

Dans' post led me to realize I myself had witnessed a case of what I will call "Nostradamus Magic Boyfriend." "Rick Ellensworth" had made a Glenn Greenwald point-- before Glenn Greenwald did!

Not only does the Magic Boyfriend obsessively defend Glenn Greenwald, post his CV with loving exactitude, and regurgitate all of his posts with the fluency and command of a, oh, let's say, of a Glenn Greenwald -- he actually writes some of Glenn Greenwald's postings before Glenn Greenwald can get around to doing so himself!

It has already been proven that "Rick Ellensburg," Certified Greenwald Defender, blogs from the same area of Brazil that Glenn Greenwald does. And is active on the internet at the same time as Greenwald. And favors the same "to recap" construction and use of hyphens that Greenwald does.

But now Rick Ellensburg goes one step into the future, precognitively channelling Greenwald's postings for the next day.

Now first of all, the circumstances are damning enough. Because while no one calling himself "Glenn Greenwald" responded to Right Wing Nut House's criticism of him on the RWNH blog -- "Rick Ellensburg" did -- we know that, once again, Glenn Greenwald read the blog and objected to the post strenuously.

How do we know this? Why, he addresses Right Wing Nut House in his own little section in this post. Right Wing Nut House gets his very own section for rebuttal, right next to Little Green Footballs and NRO.

So right away we have another case where the thin-skinned, defensive Greenwald reads a post that attacks him but does not respond to it... at least not in his own name.

But it gets worse. A lot worse.

I'm sorry, I have to say it. This is so good I want to dip my balls in it.

Nay-- I MUST dip my balls in it. And I shall.

To recap, as "Rick Ellensburg" and Glenn Greenwald are both fond of saying, every three sentences. We know for a fact that Glenn Greenwald read the RWNH post in question, because he later addresses it on his blog. But he did not respond, at least in his own name, in the post itself.

Now, Rick Moran of Right Wing Nut House chose a particular quote of Greenwald's previous day's post to criticize.

Check out what "Rick Ellensburg" says about that quote, at 7:12 Central Time, on February 12th:

Even funnier – looks like Andrew Sullivan agrees with Greenwald, since he took the paragraphs you quoted and called it the “Quote of the Day,” saying Greenwald “diagnosed the situation accurately”:

Got that? He thinks it's "funn[y]" that Sullivan agrees with Greenwald, and that AS took Greenwald's quote as "Quote of the Day" and said it "diagnosed the situation accurately." And provided a link to AS, of course.

You don't have to remember that long, because you're about to see it again:

Glenn Greenwald, writing at his own blog, at 9:43 AM Brazilian time, on February 13th, the next day:

Ironically, Sullivan, shortly after Moran posted this, took the precise paragraphs quoted above [Greenwald's quotes, the ones Moran had attacked] and made them the "Quote of the Day" on his site, concluding that my post "diagnos[es] the situation accurately."

Hyperlink in orignal post. Bolding added.

So what have we?

Rick Ellensburg calls it "funn[y];" the next day, Greenwald finds it "ironic[]."

Rick Ellensburg notes Sullivan used the disparaged quote as the "Quote of the Day;" so does Greenwald. The next day.

Rick Ellensburg notes that Sullivan said the quote "diagnosed the situation accurately;" the next day, Glenn Greenwald notes Sullivan says the quote "diagnose[s] the situation accurately."

And yes, provides the link in both instances.

Friends, we either have Greenwald sock-puppetting "Rick Ellensburg," or we have a case of Glenn Greenwald plagiarizing Rick Ellensburg.

So which is it? He read the thread, but does not acknowlege getting any points from Ellensburg; either he lifted from Ellensburg, or he did not owe Ellensburg a hat-tip, as Ellensburg was a made-up screenname with a two-hour lifetime spent entirely in RWNH's thread and was, in fact, Glenn Greenwald himself.

You usually hat-tip other people. You don't, however, hat-tip yourself.

And yes, Glenn Greenwald did read all the comments in that thread, because he takes the time to quote several of them and respond to them. He quotes one left-leaning commenter approvingly. He didn't merely read the thread; he read all the comments! And yet, as annoyed as he was with RWNH -- taking RWNH to task in a follow-up post the next day -- he somehow managed to restrain himself from commenting there... at least under the name "Glenn Greenwald."

Strangely, however, he does not praise the astuteness of his fearless defender Rick Ellensburg, the man who so vigorously defended him, and the man from whom he apparently lifted that business about the Sullivan quote. In fact, he doesn't even acknowlege him. He acknowleges "Dr. Biobrain" and a conservative he disagrees with; absolutely no mention of Rick Ellensburg.

Why is that? Why cite one liberal who agrees with you, one conservative who disagrees with you, and entirely ignore the guy you agree with most completely, who was most vigorously arguing your points?

Why not a quick mention? Why not say, "Rick Ellensburg also makes good points." Why not hat-tip the guy who apparently alerted you to Sullivan's linking of you as the Quote of the Day?

Duh-- because it was Glenn Greenwald.

By the way: If it matters Andrew Sullivan made this the Quote of the Day at 6:48 Eastern, or 5:48 Central.

Oh... And there's more there, too. I only focused on that one quote, but "Rick Ellensburg" makes several points in Greenwald's defense. I am curious to see if any of those magically made their way into Greenwald's rebuttal to RWNH the next day. But it's late, and I'm not quite curious enough.

digg this
posted by Ace at 03:04 AM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Not quite the Calamari Admiral: "Anne Margret dancing - hot! ..."

Deplorable Ian Galt: "From three twinks to Ann Margret swimming in beans ..."

BignJames: "I would totally scam money from stupid people if I ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: " [i]What movie is this????? Posted by: Bulgaroct ..."

[/b][/s][/i][/u]Oddbob: "[i]To be fair if you or I had asses like that we'd ..."

anchorbabe fashion cop: "What movie is this????? Posted by: Bulgaroctonus ..."

J Biden: " "Spam calls from DC area codes with someone speak ..."

Bulgaroctonus: "The real life actor Leslie Howard (another name!) ..."

Mr Aspirin Factory, red heifer owner: " Ann-Margaret rolling in baked beans was nothing t ..."

Diogenes: "What movie is this????? Posted by: Bulgaroctonus ..."

anchorbabe fashion cop: "Forgot for a moment that Ashley is a guy's name ov ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] : ""Latine" makes me think of Nicole Kidman's charact ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64