Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« Historians: "Bridge Too Far" Operation Was Doomed... By High Iron Content In Dutch Soil | Main | Ministry Of Silly Links »
January 08, 2006

On Infantry Armor

I've long wondered:

I understand that normal troops cannot be issued head-to-toe bomb-squad-type armor for reasons of cost, comfort, and mobility.

But what about specialty troops? I'm thinking primarily of shock-troopers -- or stormtroopers, if you will -- tasked with house-to-house fighting.

Obviously, these guys would not be very mobile, but their mobility could be enhanced by having them mainly scoot around in armored infantry carriers where the streets permitted it, and on trikes where the streets were too narrow, carrying heavy weaponry in carts. They'd ride as much as possible, march and run as little as they could manage. They'd have to rest a lot, I'd imagine, but it would pretty demoralizing for an enemy to face a group of shock-troops that were all but invulnerable to handheld weaponry.

I imagine the more confident a soldier is about his chances of surviving a hit with a bullet, the more likely he is to fire like a madman at enemy soldiers.

As the juggernaut corps cleared an area, normally-equipped soldiers would secure the area, let the juggernauts rest (or perhaps swap armor with them, so the fresher troops would then take the next lead, and the tired guys who were just in the armor could armor-down and take the less demanding task of securing the area they just cleared).

This is almost certainly a very naive question. I'm sure the military has discounted this sort of thing for one reason or another. Still, as someone who really doesn't know anything about fighting or armor or fighting in armor, I'm not sure of the actual reasons for not having such equipment and troops trained to fight in very heavy armor for short durations.

Can anyone enlighten? What's wrong with this idea?

The Armor Singularity? Bullington tips that In ten years, the armed forces hopes to have a more effective battlesuit that will weight 50 pounds rather than 120. It involves (GIVE ME THE INSTALANCHE!) nanotech fabrics, apparently.

Okay, maybe, in 10 years. But what about right now? We already have very survivable armor; it's just not suitable for all-purpose use. But what about very specialized uses, like clearing out the toughest parts of a terrorist-rich Fallujah neighborhood?

I understand the problems with heat and exhaustion. But can't these be reduced in intensity by having two teams leap-frogging past each other, then resting? And letting them drive just about everywhere, except when they actually have to enter a house?

Again, this would be a specialty, heavy-armor unit. We have specialty troops for all sorts of purposes. Why not for this one?


digg this
posted by Ace at 12:46 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Tom Servo: "Labor secretary is not an extremely important posi ..."

Don inSoCo: "Shoot the TV is good ..."

rhennigantx: "Bout to shoot the TV as I have the bell kisses com ..."

Ben Had: "DOGE,was overwhelmed by applicants. ..."

Best Games: "I feel this is among the most important informatio ..."

Boardgame: "Hey very nice blog! ..."

nurse ratched, garbage: "*throws things* Can y'all just enjoy a win? M ..."

Notsothoreau: "McConnell is in denial about his health. He is sti ..."

TRex: "359 And I don’t mean good garbage like us. ..."

animexxx: "I ɑm reցular reаɗer, how are ..."

It is Go Time Donald: "Surgeon General, eh. It’s a figurehead posit ..."

Don inSoCo: "Hey, anyone hear more about what Mr. Jones was say ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64