Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

57% Oppose Immediate Pullout | Main | Colin Powell: CIA Never Expressed Doubts Over WMD Intel
December 17, 2005

Jeff Goldstein Loses His Shit

But in a good way.

He's outraged about the leftwing media and Democratic Party's unceasing efforts to sabotage this war, and he's firing with two pistols, John Woo Style.

He posts this comment by Steve in Houston:

I believe that the majority of those on the left and a good number of libertarians believe, quite simply, that we aren’t at war; or that if we are, it’s “war” instead of war, and besides, it was based on lies so it really isn’t a war. Also: Halliburton. And anyway, we started it.

With that as an assumption, they then act in ways that are utterly baffling to those of us who believe we are in a war that has many fronts, not all of which are physical.

If you begin with the assumption that, say, the New York Times thinks the war on terror and the war in Iraq are just a bunch of bullshit, then this kind of reporting makes complete and perfect sense. Same with Dean’s and Murtha’s and Pelosi’s and Kerry’s pronouncements.

It’s the kind of fundamental difference that I’m afraid can never really be bridged, much like that between pro-choicers and pro-lifers.

It’s going to take another attack for it to perhaps change, but even then, the left and many of the Dems have an out - that Bush obviously put us in greater danger. They’ve already set up the theorem, they’re just waiting for the proof. A little attack, say a mall bombing, would do just fine. If it’s in a Red State, that actually might be better. That might “wake people up” to the real danger to life on Earth.

They’ve seen that their constituents can absorb a 9/11-style attack, and they’ve seen that the victims of such attacks become even more resolute in their hatred of George Bush and Republicans.

If I’m a terrorist, feeling all bummed by my comrades getting greased along the Euphrates, I’m really trying to find a silver lining. Fortunately, the infidels are cooperating:

-- I now no longer need fear any kind of physical coercion; the Dems have basically put me in the same position as Nigel Tufnel’s guitar: It’s never been played. Don’t touch it. Don’t even point. Don’t even look at it.

-- As a potential martyr, I know I won’t need to comply with a treaty I never signed; I won’t be incarcerated for much more than a fortnight; I won’t be returned to my country of origin; and I won’t be placed in some allahforsaken Caribbean gulag where they pee within 20 feet of my plastic-encased Koran.

-- I also know that if the kufr find my Blackberry, they can’t really do much about checking on my contacts at Harvard and Georgetown. I’ll lose my speed dial to Ahmenedijad (sp?) and Dana Milbank’s (or is it Dana Priest’s?) e-mail address, but I can always rebuild my contacts list.

It’s great. I get all the benefits of being an American citizen and still get to plot its violent demise.

But the whole post is worth reading in full, expecially the bit about revealing classified information, which -- I hate beating a dead horse, but... -- the left seems to believe it's allowed to do if done with the justifiable intent of subverting America's national security.

He calls for a strong pushback against this vile assumption. How the hell did this ever become an assumption in the first place?

Mr. Bush: Assign a Justice Department prosecutor to begin investigating these leaks and prosecuting all those responsible for them or stand accused of silently aiding and abetting the enemy.

And, Uhh, This? The New York Times and its political wing, the Democratic Party, is very excercised about Bush's impliedly-illegal-and-unconstitutional approval of warrantless eavesdrops, but, see, there's this little detail:

50 USC 1802:

(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year[...]

Yes, the approvals being questioned were cases of a foreign speaker and a speaker in America. But plainly these were for the purpose of collecting foreign intelligence.

Some may claim Bush employed a loose reading of the statute, but no one can claim he acted plainly unconstitutionally. An executive would be derelict if he did read his powers as expansively as possible in an era of terroristic warfare.

digg this
posted by Ace at 05:48 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Robert: "Headline: Woman, 37, Stabs Husband Multiple Times ..."

A face in the crowd.....: "From statements from teenaged "climate activists" ..."

The ARC of History!: "[i]What'd the Azerbaijanis do?[/i] They are eth ..."

LenNeal reads weird Substacks: " What'd the Azerbaijanis do? Posted by: Vanya' ..."

Archimedes: "[i] Diane Feinstein did something sensible when fa ..."

Mike Hammer, etc., etc.: "Do I need to mention the book 'Camp of the Saints' ..."

A face in the crowd.....: "I've been to Charles De Gaulle International Airpo ..."

Skip : "Watched that clip of Di-Fi on Bad Blue last night, ..."

The ARC of History!: "[i]Those kids have been taught that they will die ..."

LenNeal did that once too. Never again.: "To be fair we must consider it just may be that th ..."

Robert: "Morning. In a time before heavy metal, Hank Wil ..."

PabloD: "I would've had a modicum of respect for any politi ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64