Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

H.S. Coach (and Science Teacher) Reprimanded... For Licking Players' Bleeding Wounds | Main | Breasty British Barmaids Blast Brussels Bureaucrats' Bosom-Busting Boobery
August 05, 2005

Bush's Approval Rating For Handling Iraq Drops to 38%, Lowest Yet

Although I'm disheartened that the public seems ready to go full Vietnam on a war that simply cannot be lost, it also has to be said this is a much longer, and much bloodier, war than most expected. Including many at the White House.

On one hand, it's good to know that when their backs are up the American people will not insist on a 100 hour quickie war, and are willing to support a necessary war for longer than that.

But "longer than that" turns out to be about two years. Which is not a small amount of time, to be fair to the public. But there will be quite a few necessary wars that cannot be won in that span of time.

The War in Iraq was necessary, and may still yield enormous benefits. But the downside has to be considered as well. Not only have we lost more than 1500 good men and women, not only are many units so exhausted that it will take one or two years before they're really fully combat-ready again, but certainly the American people have soured by now on the thought of another war, even if the next war is even more necessary than the one in Iraq.

There are those who fault the American people for not being ready to go to war in Iran, Syrian, or even Saudi Arabia, should it become necessary. I suppose I fault them as well, but I can certainly understand that reluctance.

Americans were probably too anti-war, even in the face of growing threats from Islamist terrorists, due to the Vietnam experience. Certainly their political leadership was. The brilliant and lightning-quick Gulf War changed that to a large degree, as did other amazingly successful operations in Panama and, to a lesser extent, Serbia.

But Iraq is just the sort of dirty, long, costly and painful war that reminds America of why it became so reluctant to go to war in the first place.

I can understand why the Bush Administration is downplaying the threat of Iran's nuclear weapons program. Even if it were proven by the testimony of a dozen bishops that Iran was within one year of acquiring nuclear weapons, could the American people be prodded into supporting military action against that state?

I don't know if they could.

I hope liberals understand precisely what a loss, or perceived loss, in Iraq would entail. It would be the Vietnam syndrome all over again, a cowardly and dangerous hesitation to act in the face of great danger. Some liberals might see a benefit there in that America would not be so ready to engage in what they call "wars of choice" in the future, but I hope they also appreciate that the Vietnam Syndrome Redux would prevent us from fighting what they call "wars of necessity" as well.

Whether you hate Bush or not, whether you think this Iraq mission was ill-advised or justified, the stakes are simply far too great to allow ourselves to lose this one.

You think Bush's war in Iraq is a good recruitment tool for young angry Muslim men willing to die for Allah?

Imagine the recruitment benefits of an American defeat in Iraq.

I Question The Sample: Several commenters point out that this poll has a 49/39 Dem-Rep split, which isn't even close to the actual division in America.

There's a whole debate on weighting for party ID -- some say that party ID fluctuates quite a bit, and a lot of moderates call themselves "Democrats" when they begin feeling more sympatico with the liberals -- and others say it's fairly constant and polls should be weighted according to what we know (or think we know) is the actual Dem/Rep split in the country.

Not really sure who's right, but that 49/39 split should definitely give one great pause. There is no way the Democrats are now a near-majority, and strong plurality, of the country. Actual Democratic affiliation is usually in the 31-35% range.

digg this
posted by Ace at 01:32 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
blake - semi lurker in marginal standing (tT6L1): "Just looked up Ronald Rowe Jr. Former cop who migh ..."

MAGA_Ken: "Where was Cheadle on that Saturday? What if she wa ..."

It's me donna : "351 Insider Paper @TheInsiderPaper 3h BREAKING: S ..."

Axeman: "Insider Paper @TheInsiderPaper 3h BREAKING: Sec. ..."

[/i][/b]andycanuck (wse2C)[/s][/u]: "Bullshit alert... Insider Paper @TheInsiderPape ..."

Intercepted DU Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison: "[B]Allow President Biden His Dignity [/b]By lettin ..."

I denounce myself: "344 I know we’re doing a thing, but I wouldn ..."

Soothsayer is Axiosoothsayer now: " If true, the biden-harris SS/DHS just declared t ..."

Thomas Bender: "@336 >>Seriously?? That was probably one of the ..."

Axeman: ""Who is that guy? Is he one of ours or yours? No o ..."

[/i][/b]andycanuck (wse2C)[/s][/u]: "Insider Paper @TheInsiderPaper 3h BREAKING: Sec. ..."

Kindltot: "[i]I don't know but there was a whole bunch of lef ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64