Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Just To Piss Dave Off | Main | The Leftist Exemption -- "Civil Disobedience" Includes Vicious Assaults On Police »
July 11, 2005

Great Editorial From London: Where Is The Gandhi of Islam?

It asks some of the hard questions. Gingerly. But I guess that's the only way you can ask the hard questions.

Worth reading in full, but here's a good run:

The most important question is for Muslims, and the authorities' attitude towards them. Embedded in modern government are too many advisers who believe in a quietist policy. To them, the most important thing is to avoid a "backlash" against Muslims. But the truth is that the backlash only threatens because the terror strikes. Mired in ignorance, our Government (let alone the Opposition) has little idea how to find the trends in Islam that could really improve the life of our country, and run with them.

It is only when you start thinking about what we are not getting from leaders of British Muslims, and indeed Muslim religious leadership throughout the world, that you start to see how much needs doing. The moderates are not pressed hard for anything more than a general condemnation of the extremists.

When did you last hear criticisms of named extremist groups and organisations by Muslim leaders, or support for their expulsion, imprisonment or extradition? How often do you see fatwas issued against suicide bombers and other terrorists, or statements by learned men declaring that people who commit such deeds will go to hell?

When do Muslim leaders and congregations insist that a particular imam leave his mosque because of the poison that he disseminates every Friday? When did a British Muslim last go after a Muslim who advocates or practises violence with anything like the zeal with which so many went after Salman Rushdie?

Why is not more stigma attached to the Muslims who are murdering other Muslims every day in Iraq and the Middle East?

What communal protection is offered to those Muslims who really are brave and confront Islamist violence, or the poor treatment of women, or call for democracy in the Middle East? How much do mainstream political parties with Muslim councillors and candidates really insist on their religious moderation and co-opt them to extrude the bad people lurking within their communities?

I understand and accept that there are many moderates among British Muslims, but I want to know why Britain gets so pitifully little to show for their moderation.

When a nation, a race, a political movement, a group of workers, the followers of a religion have legitimate grievances, there generally arises amongst them a champion who can command respect for his advocacy of peace, his willingness to fight without weapons and to win by moral authority. There may be many such grievances for Muslims in Britain, and in the West, but we are still waiting for the Gandhi or the Martin Luther King to give them the right voice.

I'll try to say something here. Gingerly.

Of course we don't want a backlash against Muslims, either here or in Britain. Or in Europe generally. Or anywhere.

But.

If it is incumbent upon the more rational non-Muslim voices to restrain their more easily excitable correligionists, such as to avert a backlash against Muslims, don't Muslims have the same, if not a greater, responsibility?

If I heard someone talking about fire-bombing a mosque, I'd report it to the police.

Many Muslims, I think, would not do the same with respect to someone talking about violence against non-Muslims. There is loyalty to fellow Muslims --- combined with a general soft sympathy for such talk, if not such action -- that precludes many Muslims from "turning on" a fellow Muslim, even one talking about arson or murder.

Let's say it: It is unacceptable for anyone to put misfounded religious or ethic loyalty above one's general duty as a human being to do what one can to avoid strive, maiming, arson and murder.

If the leaders -- both political and opinion -- in the non-Muslim world were not constantly making it clear that counter-terrorism against Muslims was unacceptable, there would in fact be more bloody-minded non-Muslims engaging in random acts of anti-Muslim terrrorism.

But our leaders do make that perfectly clear. There is no -- repeat, no -- undercurrent of opinion or thought among non-Muslims suggesting that a little payback is just jake. Our "clerics" do not hint at it, our elected leaders do not equivocate on the point, our opinion-shapers and even our populist rabble-rousers (like the Rev. Sharpton) do not make statements that could be taken as an endorsement or justification for harming Muslim civilians.

Is this the case in the Muslim world, particularly in Europe?

The answer is clearly no.

Granted, we non-Muslims must do what we can to avoid "backlash" against Muslims.

But it is even more crucial that responsible Muslims do what they can to avoid "backlash" against non-Muslims.

Muslims don't want a lot of dark talk of violence against Muslims. Will they comprehend that we non-Muslims find it equally unaccepable that so much dark talk of violence against non-Muslims is permitted in mosques?

Incidentally, so long as we're so concerned about "backlash" -- the anti-Christian anti-Jew anti-Hindu anti-"apostate Muslim" "backlash" seems to have a much greater bodycount than the alleged anti-Muslim "backlash."

It sure would be nice to see Muslims have 1% of the concern for the "backlash" against the non-Muslim world -- the world that is actually experiencing mass-butchery at the hands of Muslims -- as they do for the hypothetical, always-on-the-horizon-but-never-quite-arriving "backlash" against themselves.



digg this
posted by Ace at 02:05 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Ex GOP: "Not original, but needs to be repeated. DiSantis ..."

rhennigantx: "Is this a gimmick to force people into CBDC so thi ..."

rhennigantx: "Report: Houthis Receive Weapons From Russian Arms ..."

Unknown Drip Under Pressure: "[i]Their joy is bolstered by the knowledge that, w ..."

Bulgaroctonus : "Mornin’, All. Happy Tuesday. Speaking of ..."

Unknown Drip Under Pressure: "[i]Give every head of household a debit care that ..."

Hadrian the Seventh: " Still, women getting splattered by men in contac ..."

Unknown Drip Under Pressure: "[i]As part of Paxton’s investigation into th ..."

[/i][/b][/s][/u]I used to have a different nic: "[i]One of my favorites. Not NFL, but, still... ..."

Hadrian the Seventh: " [i]"Scientific American Article Claims ThereR ..."

Unknown Drip Under Pressure: "[i]So the leftists are happy that 44% of the voter ..."

memek: "My partner and I absolutely love your blog and fin ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64