Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info

Obscenity!: Koran Torn Up And Used To Block Toilets | Main | Blog Review of Star Wars Episode III: "It Sucks"
May 19, 2005

Filibuster Fight Gets Serious

A surprisingly balanced piece from the NYT.

Key bits:

In his opening remarks, Dr. Frist said Democrats had "radically" altered the traditions of the Senate by blocking votes on 10 of 45 appeals court candidates put forward by Mr. Bush. Even as a bipartisan group of senators sought to head off a climactic vote, Dr. Frist said the filibuster must be brought to a halt either by allowing the Senate to decide the nominations or changing the rules to ban such tactics. "We must restore the 214-year-old principle that every judicial nominee with majority support deserves an up-or-down vote," Dr. Frist said.

Democrats, alternating in speeches on the Senate floor with their Republican counterparts, were quick to note that Dr. Frist had himself voted to filibuster one judicial nominee in Mr. Clinton's administration, and that Republicans had employed procedural tactics of their own to stall as many as 70 candidates put forward by Mr. Clinton.

Senator Arlen Specter, the Pennsylvania Republican who is chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said that both parties were at fault. "These filibusters are the culmination of a power struggle between Republicans and Democrats as to which party can control the judicial selection process through partisan maneuvering," Mr. Specter said, adding that Democrats saw the filibusters as "payback time" for the way the Clinton nominees were treated.


Though the showdown has been building for the past two years, some senators of both parties had hoped it would never come, sparing them a difficult choice between party loyalty and Senate tradition. A bipartisan group of senators huddled in meetings that shifted among Senate offices, trying to strike a side deal that would forestall a vote. An agreement that would satisfy both sides remained out of reach on Wednesday night, though those involved promised to keep talking.

"We are just going to keep working together," Senator Ben Nelson, Democrat of Nebraska and a leader of the negotiations, said as he left an afternoon meeting between 7 Republicans and 4 Democrats.


Senior Congressional officials of both parties said the question of how to handle the Supreme Court issue was a main sticking point of the compromise negotiations.

Three officials, who would speak only without being identified because of the confidential nature of the talks, said Republican negotiators had offered to withhold their votes on the rules change but reserved their right to back it later if Democrats filibustered a nominee Republicans deemed acceptable. Democrats say the threat of the rules change must be eliminated for this session.

Negotiators also continued to wrestle with which disputed judges should have floor votes. Because of withdrawals by some candidates and Democratic offers to allow votes on others, the number of pending nominations at issue has been whittled to five, including that of Justice Owen.

A number of Republicans said a compromise that blocked votes on any of them was unacceptable. "I think there will be an uproar on our side if we throw anybody overboard," said Senator Orrin G. hosta of Utah, a senior Republican on the Judiciary Committee.


Given the ongoing efforts at compromise and the difficult votes that may be ahead, several senators said they had no inkling how the fight was ultimately going to play out - a rare uncertainty in the Capitol. "It is when Congress is at its most interesting," said Senator John E. Sununu, Republican of New Hampshire.

Again, at least they're serious. But those 7 (seven!) Republicans seeking a compromise -- as opposed to four Democrats seeking one -- fills me with heart-ache.

Not because I necessarily reject a compromise (depends on the compromise, of course), but because the Democrats will hold fast on partisan loyalty and we cannot lose more than five Republicans.

Let me propose my own compromise:

These seven wavering Republicans can vote to kill the filibuster but preserve the right of the minority to block unacceptable judges by simply voting with the minority when they believe the minority has a good case.

But of course they'd like to avoid that... John McCain would prefer to allow the Democrats to block judges without getting his hands dirty by assisting them in that task. He still has this goofy notion that he can be President.

Maybe he could cobble together an electorally viable ad-hoc "centrist" coalition against a weak Democrat and weak Republican candidate, but that's a low-probability play.

digg this
posted by Ace at 12:35 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
fd: "Only a barbarian would eat raw shoebill. ..."

polynikes: "I first learned of the word spelunking from readin ..."

four seasons: " I'm sick and tired of hearing about Taylor Swi ..."

Ben Had: "fd , you know what I meant. ..."

Rolling Donut Unharmed By gp's Flying Leap: "57 has: Donald Trump +100 Joe Bide ..."

[/i][/b]andycanuck (vtyCZ)[/s][/u]: "NEXTA @nexta_tv 14h This Australian pensioner bec ..."

Duncanthrax: "[i]Caves frighten me. Posted by: nurse ratched at ..."

Piper: "38 Piper, I specifically bred my old age horse to ..."

Ben Had: "fd, shoeing tatrare? ..."

polynikes: "Who thought the ballon release was a good thing ev ..."

Skip: "Paragliding not so sure about, either would get du ..."

fd: ","is that one of those you gotta sous vide that sh ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64