Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Dems A-Go-Go | Main | Carnival of Corpses on Tour »
May 09, 2005

The New York Times' "Credibility Group:" Bloggers Are Right, We're Liberal Shills

The Gray Lady Blinks; Who's Next?

Young Media has taken out some juicy Old Media targets. Rather. Jordan. Raines. (And, of course, the left-leaning Young Media nailed an even bigger target: Gannon.)

But the juiciest target of all -- the biggest establishment liberal institution in America (with the possible exception of the entire state of Massachusetts) -- just said "I give."

I only skimmed the Times article about the findings of its own internal review on building credibility. Quite frankly, the article seemed boring and technical.

That was deliberate, I think. The writer was determined to break as little news about the Times' "Credibility Group's" findings as possible.

And the dependable Kathlene Q. Seelye did that job superbly. Here's how she opens her snoozer:

In order to build readers' confidence, an internal committee at The New York Times has recommended taking a variety of steps, including having senior editors write more regularly about the workings of the paper, tracking errors in a systematic way and responding more assertively to the paper's critics.

The committee also recommended that the paper "increase our coverage of religion in America" and "cover the country in a fuller way," with more reporting from rural areas and of a broader array of cultural and lifestyle issues.

Pretty much the print equivalent of a very bored looking cop waving "Move on, move on, nothing to see here."

And then she breaks out the high-power animal tranquilizers:

As examples, the report cited limiting anonymous sources, reducing factual errors and making a clearer distinction between news and opinion. It also said The Times should make the paper's operations and decisions more transparent to readers through methods like making transcripts of interviews available on its Web site.

The report also said The Times should make it easier for readers to send e-mail to reporters and editors. "The Times makes it harder than any other major American newspaper for readers to reach a responsible human being," the report said.

About as compelling as reading stereo instructions badly translated from the original Mongolian.

But the actual report that article purports to fairly digest is a hell of a lot more interesting -- and more damning of past Times' practices -- than Ms. Seelye would have the casual reader believe.

Sample quotes (emphases added in all):

Though we have our lapses, individual news stories on emotional topics like abortion, gun control, the death penalty and gay marriage are reported and edited with great care, to avoid any impression of bias. Nonetheless, when numerous articles use the same assumption as a point of departure, that monotone can leave the false impression that the paper has chosen sides.

This is especially so when we add in our feature sections, whose mission it is to write about novelty in life. As a result, despite the strict divide between editorial pages and news pages, The Times can come across as an advocate. The public editor found that the overall tone of our coverage of gay marriage, as one example, “approaches cheerleading.” By consistently framing the issue as a civil rights matter -- gays fighting for the right to be treated like everyone else -- we failed to convey how disturbing the issue is in many corners of American social, cultural and religious life.

I should note that this admission of the Times' advocacy on the issue is itself nevertheless written from the viewpoint of bias. Notice how those who oppose gay marriage are not granted any sort of intellectual or philosophical objection to the practice -- no, "The Credibility Group" can only allow that we are overcome by emotionalism, that the paper has failed to recognize "how disturbing" the issue is to us.

Nevertheless, the admission that the paper has been a "cheerleader" for gay marriage, has covered it one-sidedly, and has all but ignored even the "disturbed" opponents of gay marriage is a step in the right direction.

Too often we label whole groups from a perspective that uncritically accepts a stereotype or unfairly marginalizes them. As one reporter put it, words like moderate or centrist “inevitably incorporate a judgment about which views are sensible and which are extreme.”

We often apply “religious fundamentalists,” another loaded term, to political activists who would describe themselves as Christian conservatives. We particularly slip into these traps in feature stories when reporters and editors think they are merely presenting an interesting slice of life, with little awareness of the power of labels. We need to be more vigilant about the choice of language not only in the text but also in headlines, captions and display type.

Haven't bloggers and conservative media critics generally been making just this point for the past 15 years? If not longer?

And how about this?:

In part because the Times’s editorial page is clearly liberal, the news pages do need to make more effort not to seem monolithic. Both inside and outside the paper, some people feel that we are missing stories because our staff lacks diversity in viewpoints, intellectual grounding and individual backgrounds. We should look for all manner of diversity. We should seek talented journalists who happen to have military experience, who know rural America first hand, who are at home in different faiths.

Sounds like ideas that have been suggested in the blogosphere -- and elsewhere before Al Gore invented the Internet, of course -- many times before.

So: We were right after all.

I guess that's why the Times felt compelled to run an screed inveighing against the loose ethics of bloggers. When you're admitting this much of the bloggers' case against the MSM, sheer ego requires you to try to take a bite out of your harassers.

Pimping My Streaming-Audio Ride: Karol and I will be talking about this at the top of our new show, Hoist the Black Flag, debuting today at 4 PM Eastern Time on Rightalk radio, and repeated every hour on the hour thereafter.

God willing.

PS, we've got Michelle Malkin and James Taranto.

I don't want to say too much about the dirt I've dug up on Michelle, but just to tease it, let's say that it has something to do with a guy whose name rhymes with "Barry Bybax."

digg this
posted by Ace at 11:29 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Alteria Pilgram: "Patsy Cline - Walkin' After Midnight 1957 https:/ ..."

Skip: "G'Day everyone Though yesterday was Tuesday so I ..."

JQ: "nood ..."

Miklos, because a boy can dream: "Nope. No lottery win for me... Posted by: JQ ..."

Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "DANG! Pixy beat me to it! ..."

JQ: "New car Caviar 4-star Baby, think I'll buy me a ..."

Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "BOING! Pixy's tech thread? I've got a submissio ..."

Farmer, with my own historical take: "Patsy Cline - Walkin' After Midnight 1957 https:/ ..."

Miklos , cuuerntly attired in a signrd Rush T-shirt with a flag and all: "Obama's half-brother George, Home Sweet Hut at Jul ..."

JQ: "Money! Get back I'm all right, Jack Keep your h ..."

Alteria Pilgram: "Patsy Cline - Walkin' After Midnight 1957 https ..."

Puddleglum at work: "I'm sure your kittuh's will appreciate a valued st ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64