Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















Movie Quote Quiz Answers | Main | Score One For Keifer Sutherland's PSA: The "Jersey Jihad" Killings That Weren't
March 04, 2005

FEC Commissioner Bradley Smith Interviewed on RightTalk

The interview with Insight Magazine's Paul Rodriguez (no, not that one) can be found at the top of their home page.

He's discussing the potential coming FEC crackdown on bloggers. He asks, why does the Washington Post on-line site get an exemption, but bloggers don't? And if the purpose of this law is to limit the ability of large corporations to influence elections, how does it make sense to give the enormous NYT or WP exemptions while slamming down on individual "pajama-wearing" bloggers?

PS: The link appears to be a rebroadcast, but you will probably join it in progress. It seems to just keep streaming over and over; so, if you just listen long enough, you'll get to the beginning again. It's about twenty minutes long or so.

Kinda Scary: Smith points out this problem: How does one evaluate the value of an in-kind contribution? And does one value it as to how much it costs to provide, or according to the benefit that accrues to the "donee"?

He illustrates that linking to a web-site or starting out a mass-emailing campaign might cost a blogger no more than two or three bucks for server space, but that it might be the case that that link is valued according to how much it is worth to the campaign, and he tosses out the figure "twenty or thirty thousand dollars."

Which would be a major violation. Which would subject you to major litigation and investiagation and headache and hassle and possibly big ass fines.

Now, that figure sounds pretty high, given my own paltry charges for ad-space. Still, you never know when you're going to get linked by a bunch of big bloggers, and suddenly a little post is getting read by 25,000 people (as happened to me during Rathergate... ah, memories).

So we might have a situation where getting linked by Instapundit or Powerline or LGF winds up landing you in a world of shit.

And, even worse.... lately I've gotten some hits off some very left-wing blogs, for the Jeff Gannon interview (which matter, of course, they're all still in a very big tizzy about).

Imagine getting in trouble because the Daily Kos links to your link to the RNC website, and a sudden influx of 100,000 readers means you just "contributed" over fifteen grand -- "illegally" -- to a political party.

Won't. That. Be Fun.

How to Avoid All This: Says we need Congressmen to stand up and say they didn't intend the law to be interpreted this way. And perhaps the law needs to be rewritten.

Eventually the FEC (at www.fec.gov) will put up a draft notice for proposed rule-making for comment. Those who care should offer their opposition to restrictive rules. But Smith comments that emails that just say "Keep your bleepin'-bleepin' hands off my Internet" will not be looked at and won't be helpful.

And Another Interview: This time on the Cam Edwards show; has the first half of the transcript, and promises the second half's soon.

Whoops! Disclosure Needed: Yeahp, TalkRight is one of my advertisers, as I've mentioned before. And, disclosing further, I met some of these folks down at CPAC, and we had fun talking.

And, disclosing still further, yeahp, one of these nice folks tipped me to the interview.

That said: I posted on the subject before there was any TalkRight involvement. It's interesting to me, and I'm genuinely annoyed by the whole deal. And the interview itself is interesting. So, TalkRight advertising or no TalkRight advertising, I would have linked the interview.

Or at least I think I would have. A man really loses control of himself when the prospect of crazy blog-money is dangled in front of him.

Then again, a man loses control of himself when a meatball parm sandwich is dangled in front of him, too.

Jeff Goldstein has more, and it was his post that reminded me: "Oh yeah. Disclosure. What a drag."

And I guess I should also disclose... Sarah? The original Dusty model?

My sister. Damn it all.

You have no idea of how much psychotherapy I've needed to deal with that.


digg this
posted by Ace at 05:44 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
gourmand du jour: "There are some brutal political cartoons about thi ..."

Dworkin Barimen: "In PJW's latest video on his second channel, he sh ..."

I am the Shadout Mapes, the Housekeeper: "We need a plan to move the Guinness brewery to Cor ..."

fd: ""The official word from the Davos set is that the ..."

AZ deplorable moron: "Repurpose the IRA now. ..."

Tom Servo: "You sneer, but America hasn't been threatened by a ..."

Xipe Totec: "I don't care. Screw them. ..."

Gmac - WTF did you think was going to happen?: "Ah fuck 'em, they'll just get drunk and fight abou ..."

Oldcat: "I bet if we asked Putin nicely he'd give us lots o ..."

Monica Lewinsky: "Of what value is a young woman with no life experi ..."

Oldcat: "The Junta will instantly get rid of anyone publicl ..."

Dworkin Barimen: "Ireland is fucked in the head. Dave Cullen has bee ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64