Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

The AoS Jeff Gannon Interview | Main | BlogAds Survey
March 03, 2005

Crucifed By the FEC

The FEC is out ta git me.

Well, probably not me. But other bloggers. Bigger ones. The sorts of guys who get to appear on Paula Zahn.

A judge recently overturned the 2002 Internet exemption voted for by the FEC. The judge's ruling now makes, it seems, praise of a politican, or links to their websites, potentially in-kind campaign donations, subject to FEC scrutiny (and donation limits!).

However, this would seem restricted to cases of "coordination" with a party or a candidate.

Which would seem to limit the impact... I've never coordinated with anyone. In fact, I often don't coordinate with myself.

But what is "coordination"? I don't know, and until now I never had to worry about it.

Hypothetically, let's say that some PR person working for a political candidate shoots me an email pointing out such-and-such a story that I might find interesting. Is this "coordination"?

It's not "coordination" when the DNC sends opposition research to a liberal reporter and he dutifully reports it. (Or, in fact, when a longtime Democratic operative gives transparently-sham documents to a partisan producer at CBS and she and Dan Rather run with the story like it's the moon landing.)

Why on earth should I be subject to rules that don't apply to reporters?

Fact is, I'm not strictly a reporter; neither am I really a journalist. If you're going to categorize the dumb stuff I do, I'm an amateur analyst, an armchair, pajama-wearing pundit.

But so is Bill Press. Yes, he draws a paycheck, but he's still obviously an amateur.

On these points...

Q: What rules will apply to the Internet that did not before?

A: The commission has generally been hands-off on the Internet. We've said, "If you advertise on the Internet, that's an expenditure of money--much like if you were advertising on television or the newspaper."

Do we give bloggers the press exemption? The real question is: Would a link to a candidate's page be a problem? If someone sets up a home page and links to their favorite politician, is that a contribution? This is a big deal, if someone has already contributed the legal maximum, or if they're at the disclosure threshold and additional expenditures have to be disclosed under federal law.

Certainly a lot of bloggers are very much out front. Do we give bloggers the press exemption? If we don't give bloggers the press exemption, we have the question of, do we extend this to online-only journals like CNET?


Q. If Congress doesn't change the law, what kind of activities will the FEC have to target?

A. We're talking about any decision by an individual to put a link (to a political candidate) on their home page, set up a blog, send out mass e-mails, any kind of activity that can be done on the Internet.

Again, blogging could also get us into issues about online journals and non-online journals. Why should CNET get an exemption but not an informal blog? Why should Salon or Slate get an exemption? Should and get an exemption but not online sites, just because the newspapers have a print edition as well?

Q. Why wouldn't the news exemption cover bloggers and online media?

Because the statute refers to periodicals or broadcast, and it's not clear the Internet is either of those. Second, because there's no standard for being a blogger, anyone can claim to be one, and we're back to the deregulated Internet that the judge objected to. Also I think some of my colleagues on the commission would be uncomfortable with that kind of blanket exemption.

Q. So if you're using text that the campaign sends you, and you're reproducing it on your blog or forwarding it to a mailing list, you could be in trouble?

Yes. In fact, the regulations are very specific that reproducing a campaign's material is a reproduction for purpose of triggering the law. That'll count as an expenditure that counts against campaign finance law.

This is an incredible thicket. If someone else doesn't take action, for instance in Congress, we're running a real possibility of serious Internet regulation. It's going to be bizarre.

Bizarre? How about ridiculous?

Thanks, John McCain. Until now I took conservative complaints about McCain-Feingold limiting free speech as important but fairly theoretical.

Now it's not so theoretical. The New York Times can print up oppo research from the DNC and call it "news" all the live-long day, but if I link the Bush-Cheney website, I may be subject to a long and costly investigation by the FEC.

I'm not sure if I ever linked any political party's or any candidate's web-site; I don't think I have. Maybe I did once.

But, thanks to John McCain, now it seems I can't. Even if I find something interesting there.

I guess I have to thank the somewhat-craven-on-this-issue George W. Bush as well.

Thanks to Ogre Gunner.

A Way Out?: Non-internet periodicals are excepted, huh?

Well, I guess we bloggers are going to just have to collect up a small base of "subscribers," paying something like $5 a year, and then send them out a "newsletter" every few months or so.

The "newsletter" will be the periodical; the blog itself will just be, ahem, the free on-line content, like what most magazines and newspapers offer.

If that's the hoop we have to jump through, so be it.

My "newsletter" will consist chiefly of character sheets for my highest-level D&D heroes as well as reviews of porno sites I frequent.

I may also include my regimen for working on my lats.

All important stuff. The political content on this site will just be a little bonus.

digg this
posted by Ace at 02:47 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Alteria Pilgram: "Patsy Cline - Walkin' After Midnight 1957 https:/ ..."

Skip: "G'Day everyone Though yesterday was Tuesday so I ..."

JQ: "nood ..."

Miklos, because a boy can dream: "Nope. No lottery win for me... Posted by: JQ ..."

Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "DANG! Pixy beat me to it! ..."

JQ: "New car Caviar 4-star Baby, think I'll buy me a ..."

Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "BOING! Pixy's tech thread? I've got a submissio ..."

Farmer, with my own historical take: "Patsy Cline - Walkin' After Midnight 1957 https:/ ..."

Miklos , cuuerntly attired in a signrd Rush T-shirt with a flag and all: "Obama's half-brother George, Home Sweet Hut at Jul ..."

JQ: "Money! Get back I'm all right, Jack Keep your h ..."

Alteria Pilgram: "Patsy Cline - Walkin' After Midnight 1957 https ..."

Puddleglum at work: "I'm sure your kittuh's will appreciate a valued st ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64