Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Did Anyone Record Today's Inside Politics on CNN? | Main | Stampede: Now the Guardian UK? »
March 02, 2005

Senator Ted Stevens Wants to Take Your Skinemax Away

As Charleton Heston would say: Out of my cold, dead hands, bub.

Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens said on Tuesday he would push for applying broadcast decency standards to cable television and subscription satellite TV and radio.

"Cable is a much greater violator in the indecency area," the Alaska Republican told the National Association of Broadcasters, which represents most local television and radio affiliates. "I think we have the same power to deal with cable as over-the-air" broadcasters.

"There has to be some standard of decency," he said. But he also cautioned that "No one wants censorship."

This is going to sound like a joke, but it's not. This is real. It may sound funny, but this is a genuine political principle:

Any party that tries to take away the titty-channels from a red-blooded American man is a party that's looking to go the way of the Whigs.

Guys? Focus on public displays of indecency. Not private stuff.

And what comes streaming through someone's cables is private.

The minute you try taking away my access to the Spice Channel is the minute I start toying with the idea of comparing you to Hitler my own damn self.

Related Re-Post: Since new traffic is coming to this post, might as well throw a link to something else I've written.

You know, the next thing they'll want to regulate is video games.

And I won't put up with that either.

Not now that I've finally figured them out. And I share all my secrets with you here, in Ace's Generic Universal Walk-Thru For Every Fuckin' Video Game You've Ever Fuckin' Played.


But Seriously...


Let's rewind a moment.

I wasn't personally offended by Janet Jackson's baring of a fetish-gear adorned nipple on the Supebowl telecast. Nevertheless, I wholeheartedly supported the position of the traditionalists and religious in our society who said: "That crosses a line."

I agreed with them-- that they had a right to watch broadcast TV, during the dinner hour, and be free of seeing dirty images, especially without serious warnings that the program would contain such images.

It's one thing if she had run a special at 10 pm with warnings about "strong sexual content." Anyone watching would have been warned. It's quite another thing just to pop out a mommysac to millions of unsuspecting viewers.

I wasn't offended by the nipple myself; I was more offended by proxy, if you will -- offended on behalf of the traditionalists. I saw their point, even if I didn't quite subscribe to their view.

But that dispute, I thought, was one in which the religious right was resisting the imposition of the irreligious left's values on it -- through the public airwaves, during a program generally considered safe for family viewing, unwarned.

And I agree with much of the religious right's brief against the hypersexualization of our culture-- I don't think kids should have to walk to school with adult book stores displaying dildoes in the window, for example.

I agree with the religious right to the extent they want to keep out the profane, obscene, pornographic, or just plain dirty out of their view, out the public square, off the public airwaves.

But when they begin to agitate to regulate private behavior and purely private displays and private sales, that's where I, and millions more, split from them.

Big-time.

Because then I cannot see them as attempting to simply resist someone else's imposition of his values on them. Then I see them as attempting to actually do what the left frequently accusese them of-- imposing their values on me.

And I won't tolerate that. And millions more won't, either.

Our current winning coalition is made up of very religious people and not-so-religious people.

We disagree on many issues. But we have, generally, agreed on more: most of us think that there ought to be more controls on obscenity in the public square.

But not in the privacy of one's home.

We'll just have to agree to disagree on that one.

Because if the religious right really thinks this is the time to begin a general campaign to stamp out wickedness and vile images, they're wrong.

They don't have that sort of political power themselves, and they will alienate the non-religious conservatives they need to achieve the elements of their agenda we mutually agree upon.

Deadwood is one of the most profane and amoral shows I've ever seen. They use the c-word so frequently that I usually just call the show "Cocksucker Creek." And I love it. Can't wait for the new season (March 6-- whoo-hoo!).

It's on HBO; it's not broadcast unbidden into anyone's home. You have to actually sign up for HBO-- and pay for it -- to get it.

How the hell does Ted Stevens think it's any of his busines if I watch the show?

Careful, guys. Tread lightly. This is how coalitions fall apart.

Even over something as trivial-seeming as a television show about the uglier side of the Wild West.

A lot of conservatives are not part of the religious right, but we agree to help you pass parts of your agenda anyway. Not because we are strong believers in your agenda, necessarily -- sometimes we believe in the agenda, but weakly; other times we go along just to get along.

We help you because we're in this coaltion together, and we respect you.

But do us a favor-- respect us, too, huh?

You're not going to get everything you want. That's life-- we South Park Republicans, we Kid Rock Conservatives, don't get everything we want, either.

And if you push it -- if you actually try to force your values on us -- you may find you suddenly aren't part of a winning coalition passing the most-widely-accepted parts of its agenda, but rather part of a losing coaltion, and watching another coalition -- this one liberal-leaning -- passing much of its own.

NOTE: This post was bumped-up, just in case anyone's coming here off the CNN mention of the site.

digg this
posted by Ace at 05:27 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
[/i][/b]andycanuck (2yu8s)[/s][/u]: "750-pound alligator seized from home near Buffalo, ..."

Ben Had: "Only 30 more years of these moronic statements ft ..."

2008 is calling: "Mahalia Jackson>>>>>>>>>>>Affimative Action Jackso ..."

BillyD: "[i]158 Mind you, a Moron claimed the car would sti ..."

Diogenes: "DEI in action, and that's a good thing! Posted by ..."

Piper: "Have we discussed KBJ and her gripe the 1sr amendm ..."

Commissar Hrothgar (hOUT3) ~ This year in Corsicana - [b]again[/b]! ~ [/i][/b][/u][/s]: "[i]257 Watching another Boeing United Airlines iss ..."

Loose Emergency Door Plug: "Return to Newark? I'd rather ditch. Posted by: D ..."

J. Random UA Flight: "[i]Return to Newark? I'd rather ditch. Posted by ..."

Diogenes: "Watching another Boeing United Airlines issue in r ..."

Truthbomb : "Watching another Boeing United Airlines issue in r ..."

Ciampino - on time: "About 43 minutes [b]SpaceX - Falcon 9 - Starlin ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64