Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Ace Gets Results! ... Damnit | Main | The Monty Haul Question, Revisited
January 11, 2005

Good Think-Piece on Rathergate

Cedarford tips to this piece by the amateur (but paid) leftist webzine Slate. If Slate keeps this up, they'll be nearly as good as, say, the amateur unpaid citizen-journalists like Power Line:

CBS's remedy fit the usual blue-ribbon-panel-submits-its-definitive-report-and-the-news-organization-fires-the-errant-employees template, says Mark Feldstein, a former broadcast investigative reporter who now teaches at George Washington University's journalism school.

"The blame tends, like gravity, to trickle down, except for the need not to be too obvious about it," Feldstein writes via e-mail. "Hindsight makes the errors painfully glaring" and "the bosses that usually try to grab credit for the work of their underlings suddenly have amnesia about their own involvement in the process."


Although the review pretends that the Bush service story was an anomaly, a temporary unhinging of CBS News' high journalistic standards, anybody who has worked with investigative reporters will recognize the fact-shaving, source-buttering, and ethics-skirting practiced by Mapes and her colleagues. Investigative reporters are a different breed of human being, possessed of the absolute conviction that their wild hunches are provable. They're well-practiced at selectively quoting people and documents, overstating their case, and shamelessly revising their previous statements at a moment's notice if they believe it will serve their project. And that's no slam. Investigative reporters don't construct their stories from press handouts; they burrow into deep, dark, and dangerous terrain to uncover truths. If they weren't as resourceful at compromising reality, we'd have no investigative reporting at all.

Actually, it is a slam and should be taken at one. Perhaps Shafer is comfortable with the habit of journalists selectively quoting documents and people and hyping their thesis, while burying all evidence that undermines it; perhaps that's why he's working at an amateur leftist webzine.

I don't see how Shafer can justify dishonest reporting of the sort he details in order to "uncover truths." If what you're reporting is fundamentally dishonest and "juiced," how the hell can that be an "uncovered truth"?

He doesn't quite redeem himself here, but comes close:

Evidence of the reviewers' cluelessness comes when the panel assesses the CBS journalists for political bias and discovers none. I don't know that I've met more than four or five investigative journalists in my life who didn't wear their political biases on their flapping tongues. Almost to a one, they're suspicious (paranoid?) about corporate power, dubious about the intentions of governments, and convinced that at this very moment a secret meeting is being held somewhere in which a hateful conspiracy against the masses is being hostaed. I won't provoke the investigative-journalist union by alleging that most of its members are Democrats or lefties, but aside from a few right-wing reporters sucking conservative teats inside the government, how many Republican investigative aces can you name?

Well, there's Steven Hayes. But only expressly-conservative mags will apparently hire him.

And of course there's John Stossel. But then, he's not really a Republican.

Still, many questions demand to be answered about this journalistic fiasco. Who moved the Bush service segment from its scheduled Sept. 29 slot to Sept. 8, forcing Mapes and company to "crash" the segment for broadcast? The report skims over this issue with passive language, asserting that "it was decided to move up the date" and the "decision was driven in significant part by competitive pressures. …"

Good question. These guys spent 100 days investigating this. I think they knew who ordered this; they just refused to say.

More kiss-up-to-your-employer bullshit... like this:

Also, the panel never resolves the fundamental question of whether the service documents were forgeries or not—a bit of a cheat if they charged three months of billable hours for their services.

If the Panel can't say with authority these documents are fraudulent, then liberals have to stop claiming they know the theory of evolution is true. The evidence that these documents were forgeries is overwhelming. There is no contrary evidence that they're genuine.

It was an act of shameless ass-kissing and boss-sucking to punt on the central issue in this investigation.

Mapes was taken in by a hoax, it seems, and the auteur of CNN's Operation Tailwind program was convinced by unreliable sources. No conflicting evidence, no matter how strong, was enough to shake the faith of either reporter. Tragically, neither seems to have learned in their careers that doubt, not certainty, is often an investigative reporter's best friend.

Remember-- these are alleged members of the reality-based community. They don't just believe fervently in kooky dogmas they know "in their hearts" are true, like you guys.

And By the Way: I didn't link it, because I figured most had read it, but Power Line is must reading on this, or even that, and maybe even on the other thing.

digg this
posted by Ace at 08:39 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
FenelonSpoke: "Oh, we're doing the Civil War/War Between the Sta ..."

Diogenes: "So...bomb threats against 15 synagogues in NY this ..."

Aetius451AD Work Laptop: "355 Next you'll be telling me he didn't hunt vampi ..."

BourbonChicken: "Next you'll be telling me he didn't hunt vampires. ..."

BurtTC: "c.f. FDR and Woodrow Wilson. I despise both of the ..."

Mark Andrew Edwards, anti-Marxist, buy ammo: "343 I have Sandburg's 6 volume book on Lincoln. I ..."

Stu Podaso: "I really want to see the faces of these faux (foe? ..."

moron robbie: "Wow. Rhode Island sent 25,000 men to fight in the ..."

Darrell Harris: "I think Lincoln was something of a proto-Trump. An ..."

TheJamesMadison, celebrating anarchy and 50s B-movies with Joe Dante: "343 Nobody understands him but Mary Todd. Posted ..."

TexasDan: "Eli Whitney saved slavery and 30 more years of ind ..."

FenelonSpoke: "Proper photo for post for woman in modest attire # ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64