Seth Dillon, Matt Walsh Push Back on Trans Extremists' Suicide Lies, and the Left Can't Stand It

Yesterday, I wrote about the counselor who just came clean about her time at the Washington University Gender Center. She noted that their go-to pressure tactic to bend parents to their gender-bender will was to demand, "Do you want an alive daughter or a dead son?"

The Missouri AG is investigating her claims now.

A St. Louis transgender treatment clinic is under investigation for allegedly harming up to 600 children, after a whistleblower said doctors bullied parents into giving their kids irreversible hormone drugs, and even performed gender-transitioning surgeries on them.

Jamie Reed, a former employee at the Washington University Transgender Center at St. Louis Children's Hospital, alleged the hospital administered a litany of irreparable treatments to minors, often times without parental consent.

Speaking about her claims Thursday night, Reed said doctors would use questions like 'Do you want a dead daughter or an alive son?' to suggest to parents of children seeking sex-transitions that not providing treatment could lead to suicide.

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey confirmed his office was launching an investigation into the hospital following Reed's claims, which he characterized as 'disturbing.'

Bailey said his primary goal was to make sure children were not harmed by 'individuals who may be more concerned with a radical social agenda than the health of children.'

Via Brett T from Twitchy, the Trans Extremists keep claiming that "gender affirming" care reduces suicide rates among "transgenders."

But does it?

No, it does not.

There is literally no evidence for this, and very uggestive evidence that teen suicide rates have skyrocketed at the same time as the explosion in "gender affirming" care, which suggests that "gender affirming care" and suicide are in fact linked -- but directly.

As in "gender affirming care" causes suicides.

Seth Dillon
@SethDillon

"Do you want a trans kid or a dead kid?"

Parents from past generations were never faced with that false choice. Their kids were neither trans nor suicidal. History refutes the lie that kids are naturally and immutably trans and need affirmation to survive.

joanna schroeder @iproposethis

Replying to
@SethDillon
Wait so you think there wasn't suicide in the past? That's ... interesting

Seth Dillon @SethDillon

Replying to @iproposethis
The teen suicide rate in the early 1900s was only 1.5 per 100,000. In 2017 it was 17.64 per 100,000. That's a 1,000% increase.

The point stands that kids were neither trans nor suicidal. Not like they are today. Not even close. We're cultivating confusion, depression, and death.

Matt Walsh -- who was voted "Transphobe of the Year" by some leftwing group, which is a high honor and qualifies him as an expert in this field -- made this point in speaking in support of a bill to bar "gender affirming care" for children 18 and younger.

Skip to 1:55.

The point he makes at 3:50 is key too: If these "trans children" have always been around, but only feel comfortable now expressing their transgender beliefs, why was the suicide rate not higher in past decades? Or centuries?

If it's true you can either have a trans kid or a dead kid and trans kids have always been around -- why has the teen suicide rate been so low until now, when "trans affirming care" is the norm and not the exception?

A dick-biting Democrat demanded to know what Matt Walsh's CREDENTIALS are to say that 16-year-old children cannot "meaningfully consent to having parts of their bodies cut off." Walsh asked this Democrat if he believed 16-year-old children could in fact meaningfully consent to having parts of their bodies cut off.

He refused to answer. That's here, at 7:08.

His answer is obviously "Yes," but he doesn't want to say that on video.

He doesn't like that video being posted, so he's directing people to see "what really happened" -- in a highly-edited video that includes his insinuations disguised as questions but none of Walsh's actual answers.

And it certainly does not include his own refusal to answer whether children can meaningfully consent to having healthy parts of their bodies off.

One more thing:

posted by Ace at 02:13 PM

| Access Comments