John Hayward/Doc_0: What's Really Behind the Left's Mad Rush to Legitimize P3dophilia

John Hayward @Doc_0

The drive to normalize pedophilia, dovetailing with the longstanding left-wing push to sexualize children to separate them from parents, is one of the biggest, best-funded, and most aggressive culture war offensives to date, but it was largely conducted in secret until now.

This junk didn't START during the pandemic - that's when it was DISCOVERED by parents who looked over their kids' shoulders and were horrified to discover what was on those remote-learning screens. Kids were hit with years of sexual and political indoctrination before that.

Outraged parents who formed grassroots pushback movements were stunned to discover huge batteries of political artillery were already pointed at their scrappy little bands. They realized they were belatedly joining a battle that was long in progress - nearly over, in fact.

Sexualizing children is important to the Left because it separates them from their parents. As we've finally been discovering, thanks to some courageous samizdat citizen reporting, sexual indoctrinators in schools almost invariably tell the kids NOT to talk with their parents.

That's not just to prevent outraged parents from banding together and putting a stop to this offensive garbage. It's psych warfare, deliberately alienating kids from parents, tradition, and community. Statist control is rebranded as a cool secret club kids are pressured to join.

You can understand this agenda by considering the factors that contribute to healthy society and robust growth - stable families with multiple children, which in turn requires solid marriages at relatively young ages - and reverse engineering it to get the formula for despair.

What the hard Left hates about that recipe for healthy society is that it breeds independence from the State, with wealth and tradition passed down through generations. Robust families build strong communities, diminishing State power and refuting collectivist ideologies.

As a matter of simple math and biology, populations don't grow unless a sizable number of couples have more than two kids - and that growth isn't healthy unless the parents stay together. It's tough to have three kids unless a couple starts relatively early in life.

If people do follow this much-maligned, relentlessly savaged "traditional family" program, the result tends to be families that build generational wealth - both tangible property, and assets such as family connections, which are very helpful to young people leaving the nest.

It's fascinating how much of "traditional morality" contributes to, or flows from, this simple need for young families to raise multiple children. Of course that makes sense, since those codes and customs developed over centuries of human experience.

Among those codes and customs are the way we treat children in a healthy society. We protect their innocence and prepare them for adult life by passing down traditions and wisdom. Childhood is so important precisely because it must end. It matters a great deal how and when.

The Left understands all of this, and deliberately attacks it at every point of stress. Reverse everything laid out in the previous tweets and you have exactly what's happening in schools today, including the obliteration of childhood through sexual indoctrination.

There are good reasons those healthy family traditions have been relentlessly maligned and savaged for generations now, until the very idea of "family values" was dismissed with contempt. These people knew exactly what they were doing, and it worked.

Normalizing outright pedophilia is the next logical step in the crusade to tear children away from their parents, setting them up for a grim adolescence and programming them to reject everything that could ease their transition into healthy adulthood.

In pedophiles and their enablers, we have a relatively small but highly motivated army that wants nothing more than to separate kids from their families in every possible way. They're the perfect shock troops, eager to hit the beaches and start fighting.

They're flanked by a much larger, and only slightly less motivated, phalanx of committed leftists who devoutly believe children should be sexualized by operatives of the State and ruling Party, not their parents - and it must happen EARLY, before traditional values set in.

Of course that larger movement would inevitably make room for pedophiles of various proclivities - they're natural ideological allies. At the very least, the indoctrinators will look away from the groomers and work very hard to not notice how much they enjoy their work. /end

Part of this is a bizarre notion held by (what else) AWFL women that everyone in the world needs to be "sexually liberated," as if we're not drowning in the filthy residuum of sexual liberation already.

And, as usual, this is a massive case of projection on the case of the AWFLs: When the AWFLs say "we" need to be sexually liberated, what they should be talking about is loosening up their own tight-assed f***ed-up sexually hung-up bullsh!t and leaving everyone else -- especially the children -- out of their own creepy/frigid shit.

Why do the children have to have a drag queen's **** wagged in their faces just because you can't come, Bethany? How does x fix y?

Below, a really good video by Sh0eOnHead, who kind of kicked this off. (Well I think Sh0e actually got it from Brittany Venti.)

Sh0e on head is very pro-gay, and has been trying to make sure that p3dophilia is not associated with gays, but she can't help noticing, it's the "Gay Allies" who seem most invested in associating p3dophilia with gays, insisting that anytime you object to p3dophilia, you're "attacking gays."

No matter how many times you say, as she does, "I'm doing this to make sure people don't associate the two, and to make sure the 'MAPs' do not get to 'Add the P' to the LGBT+ alphabet soup."

But the left, and the "Gay Allies," seem determined at this point: They're going to "Add the P."

She makes one more good point: The left engages in a lot of whattaboutism whenever p3dophilia is at issue. They start saying "But whattabout Child Beauty Pageants?," for example.

She points out, however, that Child Beauty Pageants -- dressing up young girls inappropriately sexily, and inappropriately maturely for their age -- is no different than how girls were tarted up in the Netflix movie Cuties.

But the Sexual Left all defended Cuties! The Sexual Left is saying "but whattabout Child Beauty Pageants," as if people criticizing p3dophilia are all big fans of child beauty pageants, but when the left had the opportunity to object to a filmed and highly, highly sexualized child beauty pageant on Netflix, they instead chose to... champion it, as a wonderful expression of nine-year-old-girls' powerful sexualities.

And I feel disgusting I just wrote that.

But that's what they said.

So don't whattabout us, Sexual Left. You just sexualize children any chance you get.

You don't mind child beauty pageants -- you just don't like that they're Southern. When they were French and "diverse," you couldn't stop applauding.

posted by Ace at 03:00 PM

| Access Comments