Quick Hits

Hasan Piker re-affirms that he believes America is a bigger terror threat than Al Qaeda.

Left-wing streamer Hasan Piker tells Axios he believes America conducts more terrorism in the world than al-Qaeda, the terror network that carried out the 9/11 attacks.

"Pound for pound as far as the number of deaths, yes," Piker said in an exclusive interview for a new episode of "The Axios Show." Piker added: "We have caused tremendous terror all around the world."

He now says that while what he said was right, people with names like "Hasan" and "Abdul" (the Senate candidate who he's palling around with) aren't allowed to utter such truths.

AWFUL: Lindsay Clancy shouldn't be punished because she's already been punished enough for "losing her children." She didn't lose them, she strangled them to death. This is the apotheosis of the old joke, "Your honor, please have mercy for my murder of my parents. I'm an orphan, your honor."

By the way, when asked to endorse "justice for the children," this degenerate, twisted hag refuses.

Was Martin Udall right? He was definitely right about a large swathe of women, nearly the majority.

The women of Piddington have a possible savior. The UK is planning to cram 1,250 Muslim men into a base just next to the town of a mere 350, giving the "newcomers" a 3-to-1 majority over the actual citizens. Plans have been discovered showing the government actually plans to settle over 3,500 "newcomers" there, but they swearsies that that plan has been abandoned and they would never!

So, while the UK government does not care at all about the fact that the women of Piddington will become free-range rape prey for the almost uniformly military-age male "newcomers," they do care about a species of newt which may be endangered by the sudden influx of rapists.

Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat

🚨BREAKING: The illegal migrant camp planned for Piddington may be CANCELLED due to a protected species of NEWTS being found on the site

So let me get this straight...

The Government care more about the safety of NEWTS than Women and Girls?

The town recently voted to declare itself independent from the UK, but obviously the UK will not permit that. You are Tax Cattle to be farmed and slaughtered. And raped. You are chattel.

On the other hand: Andy Burnham has promised to let Scotland again vote to leave or stay part of the UK, and Wales and Northern Ireland want a vote too.

Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales leaders to meet tomorrow to plan breakup of UK: Report

The leaders of Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales will meet on Monday to discuss plans for the breakup of the United Kingdom, according to The Telegraph.

First Ministers John Swinney of Scotland, Rhun ap Iowerth of Wales, and Michelle O'Neill of Northern Ireland are expected to sign a joint declaration demanding the right to hold referendums on breaking away from the UK. For the first time, the three constituent nations of the UK are held by pro-separation parties.

The Telegraph reported sources as saying that the summit's purpose is to pile more pressure on Prime Minister Andy Burnham after he said in the parliament on Wednesday that he would back another Scottish independence referendum if public opinion backed one.

A source close to Swinney told the newspaper that Burnham "fucked up" by making the comment and unionists should be very worried.

The source further said: "Burnham has not read his brief and doesn't seem to know the basics of the UK Government's position on the Union. If I was a Unionist, I would be very worried."

Ahead of the summit, Swinney said that Burnham was "facing up to the idea that he will go down in history as the final prime minister of the United Kingdom".

Swinney said that that, for the first time, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are led by pro-independence parties, and "there could be no clearer sign that the status quo is not sustainable and that Westminster must prepare for a post-UK future".

...

The separatist movements in the UK have picked up pace lately as US President Donald Trump has ramped up his anti-British campaign. After threatening to back Argentina in the campaign to wrest the Falkland Islands off the UK, he has now supported Northern Ireland's separation from the UK and merger with Ireland.

Meanwhile, EU leader and Bond villain Ursula Von Leyden has offered Canada an "associate membership" in the EU, which means that they get no advantages at all but get to be ruled over by Ursula and her 400 MEP besties, which is the same deal all actual EU members get.

The Bond villainous made this offer on her own "authority," without asking any member nation for approval.

And there is no such thing as an "associate member."

Brussels was hit with a furious backlash today after announcing unprecedented plans for Canada to become an 'associate member' of the bloc -- without asking EU capitals to sign off on the proposal.

EU diplomats told the Mail they were kept in the dark and first learnt of the proposal when Ursula von der Leyen, the EU Commission boss, unveiled it during a keynote speech.

During the top Eurocrat's annual State of the Union speech to the European Parliament, she repeatedly love-bombed Canadian premier Mark Carney -- who was in the chamber -- saying Brussels wanted 'to bring the relationship with Canada to the highest level possible.'

But to the surprise of diplomats from the EU's 27 member nations, who would have to sign off the move, she gushed: 'Dear Mark, I said we must urgently reimagine our partnerships. So, I would like to work with you on opening the door for Canada to be the first associate member of the EU.

'We share one ocean, one set of values, one way of seeing the world. And we will now build our shared future as well -- thank you for being here.'

But the attempt to flatter the former Governor of the Bank of England backfired, with diplomats saying they were never briefed about the proposal and that, in effect, 'associate membership' doesn't even exist.

EU diplomats accused Brussels of 'over-reach', an accusation often levelled against Eurocrats by UK Brexiteers before Britain left the bloc.

One EU diplomat told the Mail: 'This bombastic announcement is just not right.

'There will be a summit at the end of October, so logically they will talk about deepening the relations.

'But no one has ever seen an associate membership and no idea what it means in practice. Canada is a valuable partner for the EU, one of the few currently in the world where we share the values, so it is nothing against Canada.

'But first and foremost the member states should be the ones to express what kind of relationship the EU wants to have with any third country.'

Another added: 'She kept this bit of associate membership out of the text until the last moment. She also did not mention it up front to EU member states.

'It seems like she is a bit too far out in floating this. Everyone is positive about Canada, and wants to strengthen the relationship.

'But there is a lot of uncertainty about what von der Leyen envisages by coining this label.'

Trump has reasserted the old Monroe Doctrine, stating that the western hemisphere is the US's sphere of influence, and rejected Europe's attempt to colonize the west.

Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh

21h

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Donald Trump just said if Canada becomes an associate member of the European Union, he might consider it a "HOSTILE ACT" and could enact tariffs or stop trading OUTRIGHT with Europe

TRUMP: "Canada has been a TERRIBLE partner." 🔥

This DOES sound like a hostile act: why else would Canada do this other than to think joining the EU gives them leverage in a trade war over America?

It's EXACTLY why Trump is right to be slapping Canada with tariffs until they stop treating Americans unfairly

The EU isn't saving Canada from an invasion by Russia or China, yet they treat the US the worst!

Democrat House candidate cries and whines that she'd like to go home after being arrested for driving drunk and crashing into other cars.

Washington state Democrat Krista Perez, who is running for a state House seat, was seen on police video admitting to drinking wine, declining field sobriety tests and begging to go home before praying and crying in the back of a patrol car after her DUI arrest.

Perez finished first in last month's primary in the 29th Legislative District, Position 1, and will face incumbent state Rep. Melanie Morgan, also a Democrat, in November, as the top two candidates advance to the general election.

Tacoma Police said Perez's 2019 Chevrolet Silverado allegedly struck a parked car on South G Street shortly after midnight on August 11, setting off a chain reaction that damaged five vehicles, according to The Jason Rantz Show on Seattle Red.

Prosecutors charged her with DUI, with a refusal enhancement in connection with the collision and a later encounter with police.

Body camera footage shows police questioning Perez after the crash and her subsequent arrest, while footage from the backseat of the patrol car shows her praying and sobbing, according to video obtained by The Jason Rantz Show on Seattle Red.

After police arrived at the scene, Perez told an officer she did not understand what was going on and claimed she was not involved in an accident, the footage shows.

"Did you get into an accident here?" the officer asks.

"I did not," Perez responded.

The officer then asked what happened.

"I don't know. I've never been in an accident before," she replied.

She also said she switched insurers just weeks before the incident when asked for her documents. She was able to tell the officer the name of the insurance company.

Perez told the officer she was driving from a friend's business on Tacoma Avenue South when the collision happened.

"Did you have anything to drink tonight?" the officer asked.

"I just had some wine while I was there," Perez replied.

Asked how much wine she had, Perez said she had one glass.

When the officer asked how big the glass was, she told him, "I think you might need to contact the business."

The officer then asked her to rate her sobriety on a scale of zero to 10, with zero being completely sober.

She first told the officer that she wanted to go home. But when asked a second time, she rated herself a four.

The officer then asked her to take standardized field sobriety tests but stated multiple times that the tests are optional.

...

Perez declined the tests, kept saying she wanted to go home and repeatedly said that she was "confused."

"Not right now. I'd like to go home first," she said.

"You're not going to go home first. I'm going to tell you that right now, okay? So your options between the test, yes or no, that's going to be determined tonight, right now, not when you go home. So would you like to take these tests or no?" the officer asked.

Perez responded by asking if she was allowed to decline the tests.

"You do have a choice. You can either say yes, or you can say no. They're totally voluntary tests," the officer answered.

"Yeah, I would like to go home first," she replied.

The officer asked whether her answer meant she was declining the tests, and she said yes.

She was then told she was under arrest for DUI and to put her hands behind her back.

"Hold on. Hold on. One second. Hold on," she said.

Perez repeatedly told the officer that she did "not know what any of this means." He told her it means she is under arrest for DUI.

They're all criminals:

posted by Disinformation Expert Ace at 06:20 PM

| Access Comments