Beginning of the End? Top Starmer Minister Resigns and Blasts Him as a Failed Leader, Demands a Contest for a New PM

Is this enough? Well, I saw Carl Benjamin laughing at Labour's plight-- Labour was decimated in the council elections, and Starmer is a toxic failure, but Starmer is basically acting like the Joker, insisting that he will remain PM and that the rest of the party can go hang if they don't like it.

I even heard -- I can't find a cite -- that Starmer had threatened to call a snap election if Labour tries to replace him. There must be a general election by 2029, but the government can call for a new election anytime it likes, a so-called "snap" election. So Starmer is basically threatening -- if this claim is true -- that if Labour tries to depose him, he will call for a quick election that will surely result in the near-extinction of Labour at the national parliamentary level.

That aside, pressure is building. I don't know who Wes Streeting is and I'm pretty sure I'd punch you if you tried to tell me. That's how much I don't care about this cuck.

But apparently he's a Health Minister and a big macher in the party.

And now he's jumped off of Starmer's sinking ship, and called for a leadership contest. Which isn't the same as a national general election, it would just be the current parliament voting for a new PM.

So Starmer would, if this actually happens, be replaced by another Labour twat, possibly this Streeting cuck.

David Shaw @David90shaw

4h

🚨 BREAKING: It is finally over. Health Secretary Wes Streeting has officially resigned and delivered the final blow to Keir Starmer.

In a brutal resignation letter, Streeting told the Prime Minister directly that it is now clear he will not lead the party into the next election. He is openly demanding a "battle of ideas" to decide what comes next and has called on Starmer to facilitate the transition.

The Cabinet mutiny has officially succeeded. The Starmer era is finished.

Yeah I don't know. Starmer insists that he's the Indispensable Man and that the country would collapse without his weak spindly arms wrapped around the nation in hug that is supposed to be paternal but you can feel his tiny feeble erection poking you in the thigh.

GB Politics @GBPolitcs

🚨BREAKING: Wes Streeting to Keir Starmer in his resignation letter:

"It is now clear that you will not lead the Labour Party into the next general election and that Labour MPs and Labour Unions want the debate about what comes next to be a battle of ideas, not of personalities or petty factionalism. It needs to be broad, and it needs the best possible field of candidates. I support that approach and I hope that you will facilitate this."

Starmer responded with a letter once again declaring that he's just too successful to be replaced and he will continue "delivering" hot sexy "change" to the UK, whether the UK wants it or not.

Dude read the room already, goodness gracious.

Starmer previously convinced 100 Labour MP's to sign a letter stating that they would not support a leadership contest and still backed Starmer. That's a good number of MPs -- but it's not nearly a majority, neither in the entire Parliament nor just in Labour's parliamentary delegation (which is a whopping 403, due to the Tories' remorseless betrayal of the voters on immigration and subsequent defenestration).

Do they walk back their support now? And does it matter if they do or don't? 303 is more than 100, even in the confusing metric system.

Apparently it doesn't matter: Starmer loses, according to the polls, to any of the most-mentioned possible challengers.

Politics UK @PolitlcsUK

5h

🚨 NEW: Labour members voting intention:

Starmer vs Streeting:
Starmer: 53%
Streeting: 23%

Starmer vs Burnham:
Burnham: 61%
Starmer: 28%

Starmer vs Miliband:
Miliband: 46%
Starmer: 39%

Starmer vs Rayner:
Rayner: 45%
Starmer: 41%

Via @LabourList, 1214 members

(1214 members? I don't know what that means, given that I assume only MPs vote.)

Relatedly, Tommy Robinson is planning a big "United the Kingdom" rally this Saturday. Supposedly, 750,000 people are expected to attend.

But Starmer is refusing visas to most of his invited foreign speakers.

Meanwhile, any terrorist "cleric" can come to the UK to fundraise for Hamas and Hezballah and even the IRGC, which continues to be a perfectly legal organization in the UK.

Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10

This Government is entirely wrong to ban foreign commentators from speaking at Robinson's rally on Saturday

I will be formally challenging the Home Office, again, on the decision to prevent these individuals from entering.

I won't be there myself, but many patriots will be and they deserve to hear lawful views in order to decide for themselves if they agree or not.

That is free speech.

Islamist extremists are personally welcomed by the Prime Minister, yet this group is banned.

It stinks.

Samantha Smith @SamanthaTaghoy

Jan 27

"How do you plan to meet the sexual needs of 600 men?" Asks a resident in Crowborough, where hundreds of migrants are set to be moved.

"I don't" replied a Home Office rep.

Recently, an Afghan asylum seeker who raped a 15-year-old girl blamed his crime on "cultural differences".

When a teenage girl was raped for years by a gang of Pakistani-Muslim men, they told her time and time again that "this is what white girls are for".

Multiple asylum seekers have had their sentences reduced by British judges, claiming PTSD or "past trauma" from their home countries as the reason they raped little girls.

Baroness Louise Casey warned that a significant proportion of those committing sexual offences in Britain are migrants seeking asylum.

Many of the men arriving on British shores come from cultures that see women as inferior. As property. As objects of sexual desire.

And they view white girls even worse. White girls are fair game, sluts, whores, and morally compromised purely for the colour of their skin.

We aren't racist for calling out their vile crimes. We aren't far-Right for demanding justice for the innocent girls who suffered and were silenced "for the sake of diversity".

And aren't wrong for pointing out the obvious concerns with relocating swathes of fighting-age men to sleepy English towns and villages, where our womb and children are completely unprotected.

Imagine if group of white men raped a little Pakistani girl for years and told her she deserved it because 'this is what Muslim girls are for'.

Imagine the outrage.

The cries of 'Racism!' and 'Islamaphobia!'

But when it's little white girls being systematically targeted and brutalised, society stays silent and accuses anyone who speaks against it of being bigoted extremists.

Why is it acceptable when the races are reversed?

Why are our politicians more concerned with condemning the "far-Right bandwagon jumpers" who dare to call out the vulnerability of little British girls instead of...

...protecting those girls?

posted by Disinformation Expert Ace at 01:25 PM

| Access Comments