Propganda Media and Propaganda Tech Monopolices Conspire to Cover-Up Newest Trans Mass Murderer's Trans Identity and Deny There's Any Kind of an Epidemic of Trans Mass Violence

A couple of weeks ago, I thought of Elliot Rodger.

You remember that name, right? He was the first nationally-notorious "incel," a sad loser angry at the rejection he experience when he approached women. So in 2014, he declared a "Day of Vengeance" and killed six people and wounded 14 more.

Obviously, horrific.

For ten years since then, various government "anti-hate" authorities have monitored "incel" accounts and groups like MGTOW to make sure there would never be another Elliot Rodger. For years the media has run stories about the "right-wing incel radicalization pipeline" and sought to deplatform accounts which might inspire another Elliot Rodger.

Well, there was only one similar case that I remember. A few years after Elliot Rodger, a Canadian loser shot some women.

So, two cases.

But a huge amount of media and government "anti-hate" interest in this phenomenon. This phenomenon of two.

Meanwhile, we have now seen five mass shootings by trans extremists, and this doesn't count the "Ziz" trans murder cult -- they killed their victims individually, not in one incident -- or the murder of Charlie Kirk, murdered by gay furry on behalf of his tranny lover.

And the trans movement itself uses the same DAY OF VENGEANCE language that Elliot Rodger did to incite further violence, explicitly calling for violence against normies in the various "Trans Days of Vengeance" they declare.

I just saw a new meme encouraging violence, by declaring that "EVERY DAY IS TRANS DAY OF VENGEANCE."

And even with the bodycount mounting -- and the victims being mostly children -- the media continues not noticing that the trans cult is explicity -- not impliedly, explicitly -- calling for the murders of normies as justifiable "vengeance," and more and more psychotic trannies are answering the call.

Quillette bravely posted a video about this yesterday, pointing out that the so-called "experts" in the social sciences and the brave truth tellers of the media have absolutely refused to even acknowledge a rising problem of trans mass violence, and spend all of their time denying it. And Quillette does make the same comparison I did to the "experts" and media reaction to Elliot Rodger.

Indeed, not only do they not investigate the connnection between transgenderism, insane trans propaganda about a "genocide" against them coupled with calls for a "Trans Day of Vengeance" against their oppressors, the complete failure of psychiatrists to diagnose and treat the accompanying mental illnesses in trans people, the effects of powerful exogenous hormones plus psychotropic drugs, and the actual growing list of trannies who murder children en masse, they actively deny any such thing is happening at all:

Indeed. To write this post, I made the mistake of googling the query "how many trans shooters have there been," and Google answered me by telling me about the genocide against trans people:

Thanks, Google! Instead of telling me how many trans mass shooters there have been, which was the information I was seeking, you instead told me about how oppressed trans people. Essentially, you told me that trans violence is justified because some propagandist in Congress entered an article claiming that we're killing trannies at an alarming rate (that justifies violence against the oppressors, of course.)

The reality? In the past five years, two out of the five mass school shootings have been perpetrated by trannies.

That is a huge amount, given that transgenders make up far less than 1% of the population.

And yet, no media interest. No "expert" studies.

Christina Buttons reports, at City Journal, that a new study finds that, get this, trans zealots have been lying about the alleged "benefits" of cutting off healthy tissue and taking dangerous amounts of cross-gender hormones. What little "benefit" that can be found by transitioning, a new Hong Kong study finds, can be attributed only to non-transitioning support and counseling subjects receive.

The trans lobby has rigged previous studies to ignore these factors, so they could attribute all supposed "benefits" to the transition interventions themselves.

A New Study Challenges the Mental-Health Claims of "Gender-Affirming Care"

Hong Kong researchers found that "affirming" surgeries and hormones yielded no significant improvements in depression and anxiety.

...
For years, doctors and medical associations have argued that patients with gender-related distress, including children, suffer from depression and suicidality and need access to "gender-affirming care" to relieve it. They presented this view as the scientific consensus, and that view has shaped policy debates about how readily these interventions should be offered and under what--if any--safeguards.

The mental-health case for medical transition relies on observational clinic studies that measure patients' psychological distress before and after treatment. Many of these studies follow small samples for short periods, often less than two years. When these studies report improvements in patients' symptom scores or well-being measures after medical transition, the design often cannot tell whether the medical intervention drove the difference, since other things typically occur alongside treatment. That is one reason systematic evidence reviews have repeatedly judged the certainty of this evidence as low and the findings as inconsistent.

A new retrospective follow-up study from Hong Kong, published in Frontiers in Psychiatry earlier this month, addresses those problems. The authors argue that much of the earlier literature leans too heavily on group averages and does not adequately account for basic determinants of mental health, such as social support and coping style.

...

What makes this study distinct is not only its size and duration but its design. The authors tracked changes over time, while controlling for social support, coping, and other background factors. Put simply, the question was: Accounting for these other influences, do hormones or surgeries still predict better mental-health outcomes?

The answer was no. Neither surgery nor cross-sex hormones significantly reduced depression, anxiety, or stress once coping and social support were included in the statistical models. Instead, it was those psychosocial factors that proved the strongest predictors of patients' mental health.

posted by Disinformation Expert Ace at 01:20 PM

| Access Comments