Enough! Sixth Circuit Rules That Schools May Not Punish Students for Referring to Other Students By Their Biologically-Correct, Original, Real Pronouns

For at least six years, the trans lobby held everyone in terror. You'd be destroyed, fired, deplatformed, and debanked for ever doubting that a man in a party city wig was not 100% literally a woman, in every sense, in every situation, for every purpose.

To question whether they were "really" women in all situations -- such as in sports, even contact sports -- was to accept exile from the Regime's roster of craven weaklings of the Professional Managerial Class.

The spineless, soft-handed, sloop-shouldered "men" of the Regime and their insane Benzos-and-Boxwine AWFL henchpyrsyns either deferred to the Reign of Trans Terror out of cowardice or else zealously enforced it as a means of revenge on straight white men.

Years into the Reign of Trans Terror, a group of dissidents finally succeeded in putting some backbone into the cowardly Regime Professional Managerial Class, and a few PMC cowards tepidly, slightly began to buck their trans enforcement officers.

And finally now, years into The Terror, we're moving to a near-majority of Regime PMC types who are willing to risk the now much-lower risk of cancellation by the enforcers of The Terror.

The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled this past week that an Ohio school district cannot punish students who refer to their transgender peers by biological pronouns.

The Columbus Dispatch reports the court determined by a party-line 10-7 vote in Defending Education v. Olentangy Local School District Board of Education that the defendant "did not demonstrate that the use of the pronouns to refer to transgender and nonbinary students would 'materially and substantially disrupt school activities or infringe on the legal rights of others in the school community.'"

Such is a direct reference to the historic 1969 Tinker decision which dealt with students wearing black arm bands at school to protest the Vietnam War.

The November 6 en banc decision overturns a federal judge's ruling, as well as that of a three-judge 6th Circuit panel.

"Our society continues to debate whether biological pronouns are appropriate or offensive -- just as it continues to debate many other issues surrounding transgender rights," the court's majority wrote, authored by Judge Eric Murphy.

"The school district may not skew this debate by forcing one side to change the way it conveys its message or by compelling it to express a different view."

The court goes on to say that this doesn't mean a school has to permit actual harassment -- just that it cannot side with a particular faction and dictate to students that they are required to obey this faction, or else be found guilty of "harassment."

On Friday, I think, the Supreme Court ruled that the Trump Administration is permitted to just have 'Male" and "Female" passports, exactly the same as every other Administration since 1796 except for Biden's.

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) recently ruled in favor of the government's removal of any genders other than male or female in passport identification. Said decision reverses prior flexibility for transgender and nonbinary passport applicants. The ruling overturns a lower court block against implementing the new limits on passport identification. This action follows the precedent set by a Supreme Court ruling issued in July 2025.

The decision reaffirms an Executive Order, which directed U.S. federal agencies to recognize only male and female genders on all official documents. Additionally, federal identification can only list a person's birth gender. Transgender and non-binary applicants with passports listing their preferred gender identity are rendered invalid.

In its' decision, the Supreme Court ruled such limitations are based on historical and biological fact and therefore don't violate any equal protection principles. Said ruling ties into the larger debate surrounding gender identification. Since the start of 2025, the government policy has been increasingly less flexible regarding individuals who don't identify with their birth gender.

I always love the left's eternal claim that the Constitution changed just last week without anyone bothering to amend it. It just changed on its own. Poof.

Members of the craven, status-seeking Professional Managerial Class, Sports Division, have recognized that, get this, sports leagues created for women only and which exclude men so that women can fairly compete are allowed, nay required, to be for women and exclude men so that women may fairly compete.

Transgender women to be banned from all female Olympic events

IOC [International Olympic Committee] likely to announce new policy early in new year after findings of a scientific review about the permanent physical advantages of being born male

The International Olympic Committee is set to announce a ban on transgender women in female competition early next year after a science-based review of evidence about permanent physical advantages of being born male.

The IOC's guidance to Olympic sports has until now been that transgender women can compete with reduced testosterone levels but leaves it up to individual sports to decide. That is now set to change under its new president, Kirsty Coventry, who has promised to protect the female category.

The committee's medical and scientific director, Dr Jane Thornton, last week presented to IOC members at a meeting in Lausanne the initial findings of a science-based review into the issues of transgender athletes and athletes with differences of sexual development (DSD) competing in female sport.

Sources said the presentation by Thornton, a Canadian former Olympic rower, stated that scientific evidence showed there were physical advantages to being born male that remained with athletes, including those who had taken treatment to reduce testosterone levels.

Really. You don't say.

"It was a very scientific, factual and unemotional presentation which quite clearly laid out the evidence," one source said. Another IOC insider said there had been hugely positive feedback from IOC members about the presentation.

It is understood the IOC is likely to announce its new policy early in the new year, possibly around the IOC session at the Milan-Cortina winter Olympics in early February.

Some work remains to be done to ensure the new policy is legally watertight. Until now the IOC's policy has been based on recommendations and guidance to sports rather than actually being part of its eligibility rules.

Some sports such as athletics and swimming have already brought in a ban on athletes who have been through male puberty taking part in female competition but others, including football, have not.

The new policy is also likely to cover DSD (differences of sex development) athletes -- those who were raised as girls from birth but have male chromosomes and male levels of testosterone.

This is such an obvious realization that it's hard to understand why it even required any realizing. As Douglas Adams said of the speed of light: Light travels so quickly it takes civilizations thousands of years to realize it travels at all.

Good. Let us stop speaking of men's and women's sports. Let's just speak of "sports" and "women's sports," where sports (unmodified by adjective) is for anyone who can actually compete -- an open category, in which men will of course dominate, but if a "transgender" "male" wants to compete, sure, he can go to the trials. Where she'll lose. But she'll be allowed to "compete."

And then we should have a restrictive category called "women's sports," for, get this, women only, as it always has been since the creation of "women's sports."

Meanwhile: other sectors of the Professional Managerial Class continue pledging allegiance to The Terror.

posted by Ace at 02:33 PM

| Access Comments