Welcome to Islamo-Nazi Britain: Jewish Fans Barred from Attending Soccer Match in the UK Because Muslims Are Literally Threatening That Their "Safety" Cannot Be Guaranteed

Muslims (who else?) demanded that Jewish fans of Maccabi Tel Aviv not be permitted to attend a local game, and the UK police announced that it is now enforcing Islamic Sharia law, and would be barring Israeli fans because of "security" concerns.

The do not mean that Israelis will put Muslims in danger.

They mean Muslims will start murdering Jews and the police don't want to get involved in stopping the pogrom. Arresting people for tweets is about the level of commitment they can manage.

Here was the threat written by a barrister and Member of Parliament:

Pressure mounted Friday on police authorities in the English city of Birmingham to reverse a ban on Maccabi Tel Aviv soccer fans attending a Europa League game at Aston Villa next month over security concerns, a decision that drew widespread condemnation.

Behind the scenes, the government was seeking to resolve the row, which comes at a time of heightened worries about antisemitism in Britain following a deadly attack on a Manchester synagogue earlier this month and calls from Palestinians and their supporters for a sports boycott of Israel over its conduct of the war against Hamas in Gaza.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the police recommendation to bar the visiting team's fans from the Nov. 6 game was "the wrong decision" and that "the role of the police is to ensure all football fans can enjoy the game, without fear of violence or intimidation."

Starmer spokesman Geraint Ellis said Friday that "the prime minister has been angered by the decision" and the government was working urgently to overturn it.

Simon Foster, the elected official in Birmingham responsible for overseeing the local police force and holding it to account, also urged an "immediate review," while local Mayor Richard Parker called on authorities to find "a workable solution" that may involve the government covering some policing costs.

Security worries over game

Premier League team Aston Villa said Thursday that police had informed the club that "they have public safety concerns outside the stadium bowl and the ability to deal with any potential protests on the night."

West Midlands Police said it had deemed the match to be high risk "based on current intelligence and previous incidents," including violence and hate crimes that took place when Maccabi Tel Aviv played Ajax in Amsterdam last season.

JRR Tolkein came from the Midlands. I think that's why he called it "Middle-Earth." (There's also an old Saxon term like "Mittle-erd" or something.)

Now it's just yet another Islamic shithole.

Fan bans are not unheard of in European soccer, but are typically based on a history of violence between fans of rival clubs. There is no history of violence between Aston Villa and Maccabi fans.

Look at terrorist-promoting AP dance around what the real source of danger might be!

However, Maccabi fans have been increasingly in the spotlight over the past year or so, partly linked to the war in Gaza. Most notably, Maccabi fans clashed violently with city residents in Amsterdam last season when the team visited for a Europa League game against Ajax.

Oh? They clashed violently with "city residents"?

Which "city residents," AP?

A "British" Minister of Parliament congratulated the town he'd threatened into banning Jews for their discretion in submitting to Islam:

Thanks to @ComradeArthur.

Related: New York City will be Londonistan by next month.

Just the other day, Zohran Mamdani appeared on Fox News where he was asked repeated about his stance on Hamas, specifically about whether the group should lay down its weapons, which is a key part of President Trump's peace plan. Mamdani refused to answer, at one point claiming he didn't really have an opinion on the matter that has been central to his politics for his entire adult life. Advertisement

This is like asking Aaron Judge if he has any opinion about the Dodgers or even just baseball as a sport and having Judge respond, "I don't really have an opinion on these topics, I just hope everyone plays by the rules and has fun."

The New York Times took Mamdani's press release calling criticism of his pro-Hamas stance "islamophobic" and put it straight into a headline with no quotes -- that is, the NYTimes adopted Mamdani's PR team's position as its own.

Mamdani also dodged the question in last night's debate, stating that "all parties" -- including Israel -- must now "lay down their arms."

Obviously, Israel isn't disarming for Hamas so Mamdani's position is that Hamas should never lay down its arms, as the "occupying army" won't lay down it's own.

See the link for that.

Related: You may remember that Graham Linehan was arrested by five cops upon his return to the UK for the crime of making a joke on Twitter about "kicking trans 'women' in the balls." A judge then mandated, as part of his conditions for bail (that is, being released from jail) that he was forbidden from contacting his "victims" -- trannies with balls. I believe this was intended to keep him from going online, because a left-wing censor-judge would say that just by typing online he was "contacting" his "victims."

All of them. All around the world.

In a minor and transient moment of sanity, a judge has thrown that condition of bail out.

Judge throws out Graham Linehan's 'meaningless' bail conditions

Ban on writer contacting alleged victims removed because it could 'mean anyone from the transgender community'

A judge has thrown out the "meaningless" bail conditions Graham Linehan was given after being arrested for gender-critical comments.

The limitations placed on the Father Ted creator were criticised for using the loaded term "victim" when no offence had been proven.

District judge Michael Snow further said that the ban on Mr Linehan contacting his alleged victims was too vague to be applicable, because "anyone from the trans community could take offence".

The Father Ted creator was given police bail after he was arrested at Heathrow by five armed officers over comments he posted on social media.

He was told he was being arrested on suspicion of a Public Order offence and questioned for several hours before being bailed.

It is believed the arrest was related to a comment he posted on X on April 20 that read: "If a trans-identified male is in a female-only space, he is committing a violent abusive act. Make a scene, call the cops and if all else fails, punch him in the balls."

The previous day he had posted a picture of what appeared to be a trans rally with the caption: "A photo you can smell."

He followed it up with the comment: "I hate them. Misogynists and homophobes. F*** 'em."

Following his release he was initially told he was not allowed to post on X but that was later varied to "not to contact the victims or interfere with the investigation".

On Thursday a district judge at Westminster magistrates' court lifted the ban and criticised the police for applying bail conditions that were far too vague.

Judge Snow said: "The phrase not to contact 'victims' is a loaded term -- nothing proved to date.

"In any event, who are the victims? There is reference to one individual who is offended. It's a type of offence where anyone, anyone from the trans community could take offence.

"So it is meaningless as a prohibition. Similarly interference with investigation is meaningless in its own right, but more importantly interfering in an investigation is a criminal offence.

"So taking everything into account, I am satisfied that it is appropriate for the condition to be removed."

The judge was also critical of the police officer in the case for failing to attend court, saying: "The officer has been given notice, indicated he will attend or another officer will attend. He has not done so.

"No communications as far as I know has been received. I am satisfied that, having had notice, by failing to attend he has indicated a reluctance to defend these conditions."

Lord Young, general secretary of the Free Speech Union, said: "The police are being far too cavalier when it comes to imposing bail conditions, acting like a law unto themselves. Graham's bail conditions were particularly egregious because there is no 'victim' in this case."

Mr Linehan has since announced his intention to sue the Metropolitan Police for wrongful arrest and a breach of his free speech rights.

posted by Ace at 04:20 PM

| Access Comments