Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups


NoVaMoMe 2025: 06/21/2025
Arlington, VA
Contact Weasel and Bluebell for info


Texas MoMe 2025: 10/17/2025-10/18/2025 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Mid-Morning Art Thread | Main | Stock Market Rallies, Regaining 3% »
April 08, 2025

The Morning Rant: Minimalist Edition

punk-monkey.jpg

The Dow Jones Industrials...aren't. Most of the stocks that comprise the index are not industrial companies, and the top 10 stock measured by market capitalization are tech and retail heavy. There isn't a traditional industrial corporation until #13: Chevron, and there are only four more companies that I would consider industrials: Caterpillar (#24), Honeywell (#25), and Boeing (#26).

The index is also calculated based on stock price, so a high price but lower market capitalization would influence the index more than a low price but a higher market capitalization. And they massage the index in other ways to make it consistent across all 30 stocks.

Does it represent a broad measure of the state of the American economy?

No. It doesn't have a single small or medium sized company in the index! How can it?

A better way to track the economy, or at least the stock prices of publicly held corporations is to watch the S&P 500, which is a list of about 500 American companies weighted by market capitalization. It's not an exact list of the largest 500 companies, but its pretty close. The Magnificent Seven (i.e., Tesla, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, Apple and Meta) comprise over 30% of the S&P 500's market capitalization, which makes it pretty tech heavy!

And it still doesn't track small companies, which by many measures are a significant driver of employment in America. The Russell 2000 index is a measure of the bottom 2,000 companies on the Russell 3000 index, which is the 3,000 largest corporations in the country. It includes more than 95% of the publicly traded companies, so it is a pretty good snapshot of the overall economy. The Russell 2000 is about 7% of the market capitalization of the larger 3000 index, so it is a good measure of mid-cap and small-cap companies.

And the NASDAQ 100 is a very tech-heavy index that is also widely observed, but doesn't have much to do with American industrial capacty.

What's the point?

It is difficult to get a good measure of the state of public corporations with one index. They are too varied, both in size and in products. Apple corporation makes its products overseas, and sells in a particular market. Just because its stock may be doing well doesn't necessarily mean that the American economy is doing as well. And just because a few tech companies are flying high because of the demand for certain technology that drive Artificial Intelligence (AI) doesn't mean that the economy is doing as well.

So a more accurate picture of the state of the financial markets should include more than one index. And there are others besides the ones I have mentioned. And because these indexes are plain numbers, it is important that the percentage change is taken into account, rather than the raw change.

October 19th, 1987 saw the Dow drop by 508 points. That doesn't sound so bad, but it was 22.6%... the greatest one-day drop in history. The worst day last week isn't even in the top 20 worst days in history.

I'm not trying to paint a rosy picture of the economy, because the shift toward a tariff-driven trade policy is going to have its downsides, which will be reflected in the stock markets, hopefully just in the short term. It will also have significant upsides in American employment, international trade, and a more rational approach to the national security needs of raw materials and manufactured products.

The problem with our ignorant, biased, and lazy media is that they report the most shocking data, and don't bother with seemingly simple things like percentages vs. raw numbers, historical context, or the difference between the Russell 2000 and the Dow! Why? Well, they are "journalists," which is a placeholder for "mis-educated, innumerate, lazy leftists."

Anyone care to bet that 50% of the "journalists who have confidently pontificated about the financial markets the last several days can't tell you what the Russell 2000 is (it's a sucker bet)?

[Crossposted at CutJibNewsletter and X/Twitter] And the Apple and Spotify feeds for CJN's podcast should be working!


digg this
posted by CBD at 11:00 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
indian nude web series: "Excellent content, I will certainly follow you for ..."

Skip : "Shouldn't have to work tomorrow if can get everyth ..."

Boss Moss: "Is that real? ..."

Skip : "It's raining ..."

Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "> Drones change everything. Or do they? - Yes ..."

https://gomyly.com/hildarichard06: "Good quality Indian HD video clips are not simple ..."

Adriane the When I Become Pooh-bah, Look Out! Critic . . .: "Hopefully tonight will be restful, Skip … ..."

Boss Moss: "I watched Dead City Season 1. I was more concerned ..."

Skip : "Surly didn't get much sleep last night ..."

Adriane the When I Become Pooh-bah, Look Out! Critic . . .: "[i] Yet another Stephen King story is being turne ..."

Boss Moss: "I went into Stand by Me with no idea what it was a ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _ : "Eminent Intellectual @total_woke_ 1h ISIS Toile ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64