Even as Comcast Prepares to Sell, Or Shut Down, Toxic Propaganda Network MSNBC, MSNBC's Ratings Crash to Lowest Level in 20 Years

End Wokeness @EndWokeness

BREAKING: MSNBC ratings collapse to its lowest since July 19, 2004. 38,000 total viewers in the 24-54 age group.

Zero Hedge: What fresh low is this?

The End Of Fake News? MSNBC Hits New Low In Ratings

The leftist "news" channel MSNBC is facing a ratings crisis, with some of its advertiser-coveted viewership dropping to a two-decade low, according to Nielsen data reviewed by Fox News.

During the week of Nov. 6, MSNBC averaged just 38,000 viewers among adults 25-54, its lowest-rated non-holiday weekday since July 19, 2004.

As reported by Fox News, this demographic is widely prized by advertisers and is crucial for network revenue.

Low viewership impacted shows like The 11th Hour with Stephanie Ruhle and Jose Diaz Balart Reports, both of which saw their smallest audiences ever.

Other shows--including Chris Jansing Reports, Deadline: White House and Katy Tur Reports--saw their worst days ever among the demos.

Several shows lost over 50% of their 25-54 audience. Among those shows are The 11th Hour with Stephanie Ruhle, All In with Chris Hayes, Chris Jansing Reports, Inside with Jen Psaki, The Rachel Maddow Show and Joy Reid's ReidOut.

...

Al Sharpton faces ethical scrutiny after his nonprofit quietly took a $500,000 donation from the Harris campaign ahead of his interview with Vice President Kamala Harris.

MSNBC conceded that Sharpton blindsided them with the donation. "MSNBC was unaware of the donations made to the National Action Network," an MSNBC spokesperson told the Washington Free Beacon.

They were "blindsided" -- but continue to make no further statements or even issue any kind of censure of Al Sharpton.

I'm sure MSNBC is worth a ton to someone out there, right?

Elon Musk joked about buying MSNBC. When someone wrote it's up for sale, he wrote, "How much is it?"

Obviously he must be joking. Or I hope he's joking. MSNBC does not have any positive value. It is all liabilities. Anyone buying it will take over the contracts of its despicable employees. Musk would have to pay Rachel Maddow her $25 million per year to do one hour of work per week.

And no, he couldn't force her to repeat his own talking points. Her contract certainly specifies that she'll have almost compete autonomy over her one-hour-per-week show.

Musk has paid $44 billion to save free speech in this country, on a money-losing operation that was barely worth $15 billion.

Save your money, Elon. There will be other interventions where we might need it.

Joe Scarborough is seeing huge ratings declines since he went to Mar-a-Lago and begged Senpai to notice him, so he's trying to win viewers back by melting down again.

We hear what people talk about flooding the zone and a lot of information coming at you all at once and not being able to sort through things. There are two picks right now that if you talk to people in Washington, D.C., they will, this morning, tell you two of the most dangerous selections they've seen. No. 1, Pete Hegseth. Simply because he's unqualified to run the most complicated and most powerful bureaucracy not only in America but in the world.

And No. 2 now, Kash Patel. Kash Patel, of course, is a person who infamously said he was going to jail reporters and journalists and news people who did not go along with the 2020 election conspiracy theory.

...

"When in the final weeks of the administration, Trump planned to name Patel deputy director of the CIA, Gina Haspel, the head of the CIA, threatened to resign. Trump relented only after an intervention from Vice President Mike Pence. She goes on to ask: Who is this man, and why did so many top officials fear him?"

We will go through it. It's certainly not because he's an expert in any of these fields. It's not even because he's an ideologue. It's because he seems, according to this piece and everything we've seen, singularly focused on exacting revenge on people who did not carry through on Donald Trump's threats of retribution.

As I keep saying, the Hunter Biden pardon was what Joe Biden considered the easiest pardon, the one the public would be most likely to forgive.

It's intended to soften the public up for hundreds of political pardons of his cronies and "business" partners.

On MSNBC, they're demanding a pre-emptive pardon for Jack Smith.

I hope that President Biden will also issue preemptive pardons to all of those people threatened by the un-justice (by the way, it's supposed to be "injustice") of what will become the Department of Justice under the Trump Administration. That, of course, includes Jack Smith and all of his staff, many Department of Justice lawyers. It includes President Biden himself, although we don't know that anyone can legally pardon themselves. He will need a pardon because he is going to be harassed and charged for no crimes whatsoever. Donald Trump promised that.

posted by Ace at 04:40 PM

| Access Comments