"Just Stop Oil" Fanatics Attempt to Destroy Priceless Copy of the Magna Carta

Before getting to that, the angry chubby-cheeked spasmoid and Islamomarxist Greta Thunberg is demanding that the Israeli contestant in the Eurovision song contest be kicked out, because she's a Jew.

London @OliLondonTV

Greta Thunberg poses with a sign calling Eurovision the 'Genocide Song Contest.'

The climate activist has joined protesters in Malmo, Sweden demanding a 20 year old Israeli singer be thrown out of the competition- simply because of her nationality.

Thunberg took to X saying:

"We will not accept that a country currently committing genocide is allowed a platform to artwash themselves. The world cannot remain silent in a genocide. Everyone who can must use their voice and speak up against Israel's crimes and occupation."

"Artwash." That's like "whitewash," but using art to "wash" yourself of your sins.

Apparently the Israeli singer is good -- early voting from Italy got leaked, and Israel racked up the highest vote total in the second round of the competition, garnering 39.31% of the vote. Second place went to the Netherlands, with 7.32%.

Or maybe she's not that good, maybe Italy is voting for her to support Israel?

Either way, you can see why the chubby retard antisemite Greta Thunberg is so desperate to disqualify her.

Trash Italiano @trash_italiano

Con il 39,31%, Israele e stato il Paese piu votato dall'Italia durante la seconda semifinale dell'Eurovision Song Contest. Al secondo posto i Paesi Bassi con il 7,32%.

I know people say that the worst thing for a younger woman is an eating disorder, but seriously, wouldn't Greta Thunberg benefit from an eating disorder? Shouldn't she cultivate an eating disorder? Isn't it right for us to encourage her to cultivate an eating disorder?

And it's not like she's mentally healthy as it is. What would be one more disorder?

She needs to take some of the blubber out of those fat baby cheeks and jowls.

Now: About "Just Stop Oil's" attempt to destroy the foundational charter of liberties in the UK, which in turn became the backbone of the notion of "privileges and immunities" guaranteed to US citizens:

Robert Shibley, writing at Instapundit, points out that Just Stop Oil is, of course, funded by all the typical civilization-destroying millionaires and billionaires.

Just Stop Oil's disruptive protests, blamed for petrol shortages across parts of England, have been funded by US philanthropists who say they want to incite a global "spring uprising" over climate change.

The environmental activists, whose oil terminal blockades have enraged ministers and rightwing commentators, have received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Los Angeles-based Climate Emergency Fund (CEF).

"We're their lead institutional funder," CEF's executive director, Margaret Klein Salamon, said. "I think actually their exclusive institutional funder at this point."

On Friday, eight Just Stop Oil activists were still being held after 43 were arrested for allegedly blockading and smashing petrol pumps at service stations on London's M25 orbital motorway. About 400 people have been arrested more than 1,000 times taking part in the campaign since it began less than a month ago, according to organisers' own tally.

"A lot of groups we fund use civil disobedience and high stakes civil disobedience," Salamon said. "But Just Stop Oil to me is the next stage, the next evolution of climate campaigning, in that they really seem to me to be operating as a nonviolent army with that level of discipline, planning, coordination.

"I'm so impressed with what they've been able to do with extremely slim resources and, you know, not that many activists."

Yes, all that crime, all that destruction and sabotage, you're paying for.

...

CEF operated like venture capital, according to Salamon, seeking out small groups who could benefit hugely from $50,000 to $100,000 donations that would barely make a difference to the larger environmental charities.

...

Salamon insisted CEF does not fund any illegal activity. "What we do fund is recruitment, training, organising staff, core staff, etc ... and we fund legal protest and disruption," she said.

You do directly fund crime, and it's time to make the funders of riots, vandalism, arson, etc., pay the costs of the destruction -- plus punitive damages.

"The fact that some of these groups get into harder edged civil disobedience, that's their choice. And we think that from a historic and social science perspective, it's very well supported, and we commend their bravery in doing so."

But we're totally not funding crime!

All the groups funded by the CEF must be committed to non-violence. "And we don't fund groups, presently, that allow their membership to take action while concealing their identities," Salamon said.

Donations to CEF come mainly from wealthy individuals and family foundations. The fund was started with a $500,000 donation from Aileen Getty, the granddaughter of Jean Paul Getty whose petrochemical empire made him the world's richest man, a source of some controversy in the climate activist world.

Adam McKay, the producer and screenwriter behind the climate change satire Don't Look Up, had just donated $250,000, "particularly inspired by Just Stop Oil, Scientist Rebellion and other civil resistance", Salamon said.

Concerns have been raised about the funding of direct action groups by wealthy individuals.

I don't see George Soros mentioned there. Maybe they're suppressing that because it would be "antisemitic" to name him as a funder.

In more News of the Nobodies, Non-Prince Harry is being completely frozen out by his former family on his non-triumphant return to England.

Have the Royals finally taken their revenge?

Having borne the vilest of slurs, insults, accusations and betrayals out of Camp Montecito with dignified silence -- for years now -- it seems they have served up, with quiet elegance, the dish best served cold.

The chill is felt Stateside, trust.

The prodigal Prince Harry, meant to take his victory lap in London as his Invictus Games reach the ten-year mark, entered St. Paul's alone while his father and brother held events mere miles away.

The royals, it was announced, would not be seeing Harry this trip. Nor would he be welcome to stay in any of the many palaces, castles or cottages in the King's portfolio.

No: King Charles, currently battling cancer, was too 'busy' to carve out even a few moments for his son, instead hosting a garden party at Buckingham Palace.

Of the 30,000 guests invited to that event, Harry did not make the list.

As for William: He, of course, also didn't see Harry this week, instead hosting an investiture in Windsor the morning of Harry's Invictus celebration.

In further news of the woke: Bud Light accepts the reality that they will never recapture the customers they pissed away for the sake of an aging sorority bitch's need to be "on trend."

They're now promising they will "stay in our lane." Notice they still won't say what they did, nor specify which "lanes" they will no longer be moving into.

They're still more afraid of the Alphabet Mafia than us.

The boycott is on until that changes.

Belgian drinks company Anheuser-Busch Inbev meets quarterly revenue forecasts but fails to fully recover from last year's backlash.

Brewer AB InBev announced on Wednesday that its revenue grew by 2.6% in the first three months of the year, a result which fell in line with analysts' expectations.

In terms of volume, AB InBev sold slightly more beer than anticipated, noting a decline of 0.6%.

Revenue figures for the firm, which makes Stella Artois, Bud Light, and Corona beer, were boosted by sales of products such as spirits-based drinks in cans.

The results are nonetheless historically low due to the lasting effects of a customer boycott.

Last year, AB InBev sparked controversy when deciding to work with the transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney.

...

Earlier this week, AB InBev's Europe CEO Jason Warner told UK media outlet the Telegraph newspaper that the company will "stay in our lane" following the reaction to the campaign, which had sought to appeal to consumers by promoting diversity.

Another article had a company executive admitting it could take "ten years" to regain the customers it lost in "just one [year]."

Try never.

Meanwhile, a Rasmussen poll finds that 71% of the public wants Disney to stop being a gay propaganda groomer factory.

Over 71 percent of American adults want Disney to pivot back toward "family-friendly entertainment" and away from the LGBTQIA agenda.

A Rasmussen poll also found that 53 percent of adults "strongly agreed" with the following statement: "Disney should return to wholesome programming and allow parents to decide when their children are taught about sexuality?"

In 2022, Disney executive Karen Burke touted that "the company has 'many, many, many LGBTQIA characters in our stories" and that Disney received positive feedback from LGBTQ activists.

However, another 54 percent of participants say "LGBTQIA programming" is not "appropriate for children under 12."

Creepy LGBTQ activists do not control the box office. Ordinary Americans do. And Rasmussen's polling is consistent with how moviegoers at large view Disney films.

...

An Axios Harris study found that Americans now consider Disney the fifth most polarizing brand in the country.

Priceless Copy of the Magna Carta&bodytext=Before getting to that, the angry chubby-cheeked spasmoid and Islamomarxist Greta Thunberg is demanding that the Israeli contestant in the Eurovision song contest be kicked out, because she's a Jew. London @OliLondonTV Greta Thunberg poses with a sign calling Eurovision...&topic=world_news"> posted by Disinformation Expert Ace at 02:35 PM

| Access Comments