Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
Chris Cuomo's stance on Ivermectin as a theraputic drug for COVID-19 has done a complete 180, as the news anchor who once said on CNN that anyone promoting it should be "shamed" now says he's "taking a regular dose" to deal with his own struggles with long-term effects of an infection.
Cuomo shared in January that he's suffering from "long COVID," or the long-term lingering effects of a previous infection. This week on the PBD Podcast, a current-events show hosted by Patrick Bet-David, the NewsNation personality said he's using the antiviral to help with an ongoing inflammatory response and "brain fog."
"I'll tell you something else that's gonna get you a lot of hits," Cuomo said. "I am taking ... a regular dose of Ivermectin. Ivermectin was a boogeyman during COVID. That was wrong. We were given bad information about Ivermectin. The real question is, why?"
When COVID-19 was peaking in 2020 and 2021, Ivermectin emerged as a fringe remedy, and was instantly denounced as a "horse dewormer" -- including a segment that mocked podcaster Joe Rogan for announcing that he had success taking the antiviral drug. Though it was first used in the 1970s as an antiparasitic primarily for animals, Ivermectin's use in humans had become widespread in later decades, as a malaria prophylaxis and treatment in particular, and is considered very safe.
"Everyone's going to say 'Joe Rogan was right,'" Cuomo continued. "No, Joe Rogan was saying -- yeah, he was right -- that's not what matters. What matters is, the entire medical community knew that Ivermectin couldn't hurt you. They knew it ... I know they knew it. How do I know? Because now I'm doing nothing but talking to these clinicians, who at the time were overwhelmed by COVID, and they weren't saying anything!"
When Cuomo was still a CNN anchor, he and colleague Don Lemon ridiculed its use after Rogan's disclosure:
"People who are getting, injecting, drugs for animals," Lemon said at the time, "and horse -- ."
"And people telling them to!" Cuomo interjected at the time. "What person -- you know you talk about cancel culture and who to shame -- Ivermectin? A de-wormer? Really? ... they need to be shamed. They need to be called out and shamed, brother."
On the PBD podcast, Cuomo walked that back -- way back -- suggesting that part of the reason Ivermectin was so vehemently rejected was that there was no profit in a drug that was already inexpensive and widely distributed.
"Journalists" claim that only "experts" should offer advice about technical subjects, bu then they -- non-experts in everything except propaganda -- routinely tell people what The Science (TM) is.
Further, Joe Rogan was not prescribed ivermectin by a hobo off the street. A medical doctor, an expert in health and disease, prescribed it.
Did CNN ever say "Well, an expert prescribed this, so we should defer to his expertise"?
They would parry this by saying "he's not an expert in covid," to which I reply: He's certainly more of an expert in covid than a fucking J-school graduate and nepo baby gay fuckboy, Anderson Cooper.
These Experts In Nothing Except Being Unwarrantly Arrogant Liberals all called a drug made for humans, whose creation was awarded a Nobel Prize in (human) medicine in 2015, "horse dewormer" and "horse paste."
I guess the Nobel Prize committee in medicine aren't relevant enough experts in discerning between People Medicine and Horse Medicine, too.
The "Don't Speak on a Subject Unless You're an Expert" rule is not a rule, it's a con. You can tell it's a con because the people pushing it the most aggressively violate it themselves.
And, by the way, I've never seen a liberal "journalist" who did not believe he is actually an "expert" on everything he talks about. They're all stupid, ignorant blowhards with an agenda but they all think they're polymath Renaissance Men.